September 2013 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

[tor-talk] Tor Weekly News — September 18th, 2013
by Eugen Leitl 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

----- Forwarded message from harmony <harmony01(a)riseup.net> ----- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 12:00:19 +0000 From: harmony <harmony01(a)riseup.net> To: tor-news(a)lists.torproject.org, tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org Subject: [tor-talk] Tor Weekly News — September 18th, 2013 Reply-To: tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org ======================================================================== Tor Weekly News September 18th, 2013 ======================================================================== Welcome to the twelfth issue of Tor Weekly News, the weekly newsletter that covers what’s happening in the closely-observed Tor community. Official response to QUICK ANT disclosure ----------------------------------------- Another round of speculation regarding the attitude of state surveillance agencies towards the Tor network was provoked by a slide [1] featured in an edition of the Brazilian current-affairs show “Fantástico”, broadcast on September 8th [2]. The slide, leaked as part of the ongoing Snowden disclosures, appeared to show a tab in the alleged GCHQ [3] FLYING PIG surveillance interface labelled “Query QUICK ANT — Tor events QFD”. Users on Reddit [4] and Twitter [5] began to suggest possible attacks on Tor that might be managed through such an interface. Andrew Lewman posted an official response on the Tor blog [6] in which he reiterated that “it’s not clear what the NSA or GCHQ can or cannot do”, and that well-known theoretical attacks against the Tor network are clearly described on the project’s FAQ page [7]. He further added that the tool in question was more likely to involve “some ‘Tor flow detector’ scripts that let them pick Tor flows out of a set of flows they’re looking at” than “anything to do with deanonymizing Tor users, except insofar as they might have traffic flows from both sides of the circuit in their database.” Finally, he remarked that instead of engaging in speculation based on limited evidence, “we’d rather spend our time developing Tor and conducting research to make a better Tor.” [1] https://people.torproject.org/~andrew/2013-09-10-quick-ant-tor-events-qfd.p… [2] http://g1.globo.com/fantastico/noticia/2013/09/nsa-documents-show-united-st… [3] https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/378185448293552128 [4] http://www.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/1m3jum/gchq_tor_events_capture/ [5] https://twitter.com/jonathanmayer/status/377292928718499841 [6] https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-nsa-gchq-and-quick-ant-speculation [7] https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#AttacksOnOnionRouting Entry guards and linkability ---------------------------- Leif Ryge pointed out [8] an issue with Tor’s current “entry guards” system, whereby connections entering Tor from different points on the same network could potentially be linked to an individual user based on the three entry nodes selected by that user’s Tor client, which remain constant for a period of 4-8 weeks [9]. Leif suggested that “assuming this is an accurate assessment, wouldn’t it make sense to maintain separate sets of entry guards for each network that the user connects from?” Nick Mathewson replied [10] with an acknowledgement of the problem and a number of reasons why simply generating separate sets of guards might also harm a user’s anonymity: “You would *not*, for example, want to maintain a different set of entry guards for every IP that you receive, since if you did, a hostile DHCP server could feed you new IPs until you picked a hostile guard. Similarly, if you are a busy traveler who changes your view of what network you are on hundreds or thousands of times, your chance of picking a hostile guard would rise accordingly.” He also pointed out that “having a record in your state file of every network you have visited is not necessarily the best idea either.” Nick concluded by mentioning Roger Dingledine’s proposal to lower the number of entry guards selected by a client to one only, “to avoid the property of letting guard choices identify Tor clients”. [8] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-September/005423.html [9] https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay [10] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-September/005424.html The lifecycle of a new relay: further research needed ----------------------------------------------------- In response to some confusion on the part of relay operators over the apparently slow growth in the use of newly-established nodes by clients, Roger Dingledine posted on the Tor blog [11] a detailed account of how new relays, and the bandwidth they supply, are gradually integrated into the Tor network by directory authorities, bandwidth authorities, and clients themselves. Roger stressed that “the descriptions here are in part anecdotal”. Roger outlined the four broad phases that define the development of a relay within the network, and finished by offering a number of questions for further research, under a general rubric: “what do these phases look like with real-world data?” If you would like to contribute to the Tor community’s understanding of the interaction between individual relays and the network as a whole, please take a look both at the list of sample questions and at Tor’s publicly-available archive of metrics data [12], and see what you can find! [11] https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay [12] https://metrics.torproject.org/data.html Food for thought ---------------- “Back in the ancient pre-Tor days, at the height of the crypto wars, Ian Goldberg asked me at Financial Crypto in 1998 why we created onion routing. Not entirely facetiously I told him that the fascinating technological problems and the potential to better protect people and their activities was nice, but the real attraction was to create a context where people who were sure they should hate each other were forced to collaborate.” [13] — Paul Syverson [13] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-September/030097.html Tor help desk roundup --------------------- The Tor help desk received a request for assistance setting up Thunderbird to work with Tor. Thunderbird can be made to route connections through Tor using the TorBirdy add-on. Further information about using Tor with Thunderbird can be found on the wiki [14]. Another user wrote to comment on the lack of OpenSUSE support on Tor’s rpm package page [15]. There is an open ticket concerning this issue, but it hasn’t seen activity for some months [16]. A new ticket was opened that addresses this concern more specifically [17]. [14] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/torbirdy#BeforeusingTorBirdy [15] https://www.torproject.org/docs/rpms.html [16] https://bugs.torproject.org/4389 [17] https://bugs.torproject.org/9718 Miscellaneous news ------------------ The commitment level for the proposed Tor StackExchange page is hovering at 88%; it needs to reach 100% before it will be accepted into beta. If you think you will be able to contribute by answering questions from current or potential Tor users, please sign up! [18] [18] http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/56447/tor-online-anonymity-privac… Brian Callahan alerted relay operators running FreeBSD and OpenBSD to the release of ports updated to the new tor 0.2.4.17-rc [19]. Christian Sturm then promptly announced the release of updated packages for NetBSD, DragonFly BSD, illumos, Minix, and “other systems potentially using pkgsrc” [20]. [19] http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/tor-bsd/2013-September/000044.html [20] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-September/030036.html Karsten Loesing updated tor’s GeoIP database to the newest version [21]. Karsten also published the results of his memory usage test on a version of tor that reports additional statistics, which he conducted using the Shadow network simulator [22]. Finally, Karsten asked for comments on his proposal to retire the old method of estimating user numbers on the metrics page over the next few weeks in favor of a more reliable, more efficient system (which has been in beta for some time already), and with it to remove the accumulated data associated with the older method [23]. [21] https://bugs.torproject.org/9714 [22] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7359#comment:18 [23] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-September/005443.html Fabio Pietrosanti announced that the available cipher suites for connections to tor2web.org have been updated to a much stronger set [24]. [24] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-September/030003.html Robert published the results of an investigation into different kinds of round-trip time (RTT) measurement, and their efficiency in building circuits through the Tor network [25]. [25] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-September/005440.html George Kadianakis asked for comments on his early draft of a proposal for different methods of migrating the Hidden Service protocol to a more secure version [26]. George also pushed new versions of obfsproxy (0.2.3) and pyptlib (0.0.4) [27]. [26] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-September/005438.html [27] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-September/005441.html In the course of a thread about the size of browser windows posing a fingerprinting threat [28], harmony discovered that users of Ubuntu’s Unity desktop should disable the “automaximize” behavior, as it can override one of Tor Browser’s anti-fingerprinting measures [29]. [28] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-September/030022.html [29] https://bugs.torproject.org/9738 Tom Lowenthal submitted his monthly status report for August [30]. [30] https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-reports/2013-September/000339.ht… Upcoming events --------------- Sep 29 | Colin at the Winnipeg Cryptoparty | Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada | http://wiki.skullspace.ca/index.php/CryptoParty | Sep 29-01 | Tor at OpenITP Circumvention Tech Summit IV | Berlin, Germany | https://www.openitp.org/openitp/circumvention-tech-summit.html | Oct 09-10 | Andrew speaking at Secure Poland 2013 | Warszawa, Poland | http://www.secure.edu.pl/ This issue of Tor Weekly News has been assembled by harmony, Lunar, dope457, Matt Pagan, and Karsten Loesing. Want to continue reading TWN? Please help us create this newsletter. We still need more volunteers to watch the Tor community and report important news. Please see the project page [31], write down your name and subscribe to the team mailing list [32] if you want to get involved! [31] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorWeeklyNews [32] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/news-team -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

1 0

<nettime> Yochai Benkler: Time to tame the NSA behemoth
by Eugen Leitl 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

----- Forwarded message from nettime's_chronicler <nettime(a)kein.org> ----- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:15:26 -0100 From: nettime's_chronicler <nettime(a)kein.org> To: nettime-l(a)kein.org Subject: <nettime> Yochai Benkler: Time to tame the NSA behemoth Reply-To: a moderated mailing list for net criticism <nettime-l(a)mail.kein.org> <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/13/nsa-behemoth-trampling…> Time to tame the NSA behemoth trampling our rights From leaks and Fisa court papers, it's clear the NSA is a bloated spying bureaucracy out of control. It can't be reformed by insiders Yochai Benkler The spate of new NSA disclosures substantially raises the stakes of this debate. We now know that the intelligence establishment systematically undermines oversight by lying to both Congress and the courts. We know that the NSA infiltrates internet standard-setting processes to security protocols that make surveillance harder. We know that the NSA uses persuasion, subterfuge, and legal coercion to distort software and hardware product design by commercial companies. We have learned that in pursuit of its bureaucratic mission to obtain signals intelligence in a pervasively networked world, the NSA has mounted a systematic campaign against the foundations of American power: constitutional checks and balances, technological leadership, and market entrepreneurship. The NSA scandal is no longer about privacy, or a particular violation of constitutional or legislative obligations. The American body politic is suffering a severe case of auto-immune disease: our defense system is attacking other critical systems of our body. First, the lying. The National Intelligence University, based in Washington, DC, offers a certificate program called the denial and deception advanced studies program. That's not a farcical sci-fi dystopia; it's a real program about countering denial and deception by other countries. The repeated misrepresentations suggest that the intelligence establishment has come to see its civilian bosses as adversaries to be managed through denial and deception. We learned months ago that the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper lied under oath to Congress. Now, we know that General Keith Alexander filed a "declaration" (which is like testifying in writing), asserting an interpretation of violations that the court said "strains credulity". The newly-disclosed 2009 opinion includes a whole section entitled "Misrepresentations to the Court", which begins with the sentence: The government has compounded its noncompliance with the court's orders by repeatedly submitting inaccurate descriptions of the alert list process to the FISC. General Alexander's claim that the NSA's vast numbers of violations were the consequences of error and incompetence receive derisive attention. But this claim itself was in a court submission intended to exculpate the agency from what would otherwise have been an intentional violation of the court's order. There is absolutely no reason to believe the claims of incompetence and honest error; there is more reason to assume that these are intended to cover up a worse truth: intentional violations. Second, the subversion. Last week, we learned that the NSA's strategy to enhance its surveillance capabilities was to weaken internet security in general. The NSA infiltrated the social-professional standard-setting organizations on which the whole internet relies, from National Institute of Standards and Technology to the Internet Engineering Task Force itself, the very institutional foundation of the internet, to weaken the security standards. Moreover, the NSA combined persuasion and legal coercion to compromise the commercial systems and standards that offer the most basic security systems on which the entire internet runs. The NSA undermined the security of the SSL standard critical to online banking and shopping, VPN products central to secure corporate, research, and healthcare provider networks, and basic email utilities. Serious people with grave expressions will argue that if we do not ruthlessly expand our intelligence capabilities, we will suffer terrorism and defeat. Whatever minor tweaks may be necessary, the argument goes, the core of the operation is absolutely necessary and people will die if we falter. But the question remains: how much of what we have is really necessary and effective, and how much is bureaucratic bloat resulting in the all-to-familiar dynamics of organizational self-aggrandizement and expansionism? The "serious people" are appealing to our faith that national security is critical, in order to demand that we accept the particular organization of the Intelligence Church. Demand for blind faith adherence is unacceptable. What did we actually know about what we got in exchange for undermining internet security, technology markets, internet social capital, and the American constitutional order? The intelligence establishment grew by billions of dollars; thousands of employees; and power within the executive. And we the people? Not so much. Court documents released this week show that after its first three years of operation, the best the intelligence establishment could show the judge overseeing the program was that it had led to opening "three new preliminary investigations". This showing, noted Judge Walton in his opinion, "does not seem very significant". If this was the best the intelligence community could put on the table when it faced the risk of judicial sanction, we can assume that all the hand-waving without hard, observable, testable facts is magician's patter, aimed to protect the fruits of a decade's worth of bureaucratic expansionism. Claims that secrecy prevents the priesthood from presenting such testable proof appeal to a doctrine of occult infallibility that we cannot afford to accept. In August, 205 members of the House voted in favor of the Amash-Conyers Amendment that would have rewritten Section 215 of the Patriot Act, the section used to justify bulk collection of domestic phone call metadata. At the time, this was a critically important move that was highly targeted at a narrow and specific abuse. But the breadth and depth of organizational deception and subversion force us to recognize that we need reconstruction that goes much deeper than any specific legislative fix. We need a fundamental organizational reform. The so-called "outside independent experts" committee which the president has appointed, with insiders' insiders like Michael Morell and Richard Clarke, will not come close to doing the trick. Nor is it likely to allay anyone's fears who is not already an Intelligence Church adherent. Given the persistent lying and strategic errors of judgment that this week's revelations disclosed, the NSA needs to be put into receivership. Insiders, beginning at the very top, need to be removed and excluded from the restructuring process. Their expertise led to this mess, and would be a hindrance, not a help, in cleaning it up. We need a forceful, truly independent outsider, with strong, direct congressional support, who would recruit former insider-dissenters like Thomas Drake or William Binney to reveal where the bodies are buried. Anything short of root-and-branch reconstruction will be serving weak tea to a patient with a debilitating auto-immune disease. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)kein.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

1 0

[6] crypto state
by brian carroll 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

// note: my cypherpunks posts are copyright free --- overview --- the application of [crypto] appears to occupy a dual realm, spanning both the need for /secrecy/ and the need for /security/, which it is assumed may require different approaches in how in its design and functioning, and the 'systems' may operate within different parameters- say a secure facility with employee IDs that involves managing secrets, versus an SSL exchange using a web browser to search google. It would seem to an outsider, unknowing actual parameters involved, that some technology functions more as a secure mode and others as a secret or hidden mode, and that this may be different in that data may be readily accessible or known at endpoints or throughout an infrastructure whereas in another this could be so tightly controlled as to involve almost personal secret-keeping between those who access purposefully hidden 'information' that must be kept contained, out of existing channels, or activated in a different realm or zone of operation, say peer to peer with another who also shares the secret yet not communicating about what it is, yet in having access to the knowledge it recontexualizes shared observation and in some sense could function as if a shared key has been passed and a secret corridor or psychic tunnel or 'secret network' exists as a result of those who know what is /unknown/ versus those who remaining unknowing what this could be in the infinity of potential particular views of any given event or idea or truth. whereas accessing a webpage with some anonymity in the data transmission may involve a largely known exchange, excepting for those on the outside of the shared infrastructural connection; and so it is more a data security approach versus centered or focused on /secrets/. thus for different observers, the question of the Crypto State could tend more towards the maintenance and ethics and implementation of an approach to manage protect and exploit [secrets], which could be government and spy agency focused on its internal and peer state connections, whereas for another population, the citizenry, the issue of crypto could function most in a context of [security], as if a realm delineating a lawful boundary or property line that is potentially protected by law, and possibly is most focused in the business, legal, and institutional realm. this is a basic hypothesis so those who actually know this situation could model it in a more accurate framework, whatever it may be, between security and secrecy. i do not believe that an issue like state surveillance can be disconnected from its actual deeper purpose, which few more know of or by NDA be unable to communicate to others and thus an issue of faith in its mission can be evaluated either in aligning with a patriotic ideology, which is incredibly dangerous if checks and balances are gone from government accountability, or in an accurate modeling of the truth of the situation and the framework events are occurring within- that is, context. everyone knows that lawlessness exists in the realm of corporate use of private data to make money, either through data mining or private surveillance, just look at the aggressive panhandling via advertisements on every webpage, as if billboards have their own AI agenda as spore lifeforms and are trying to secure their future against competing words and ideas that they seek to distract from and cover or automatically play video or audio and use up network data streams as constant 'junk data' and yet it is citizens who are paying for this malfeasance, businesses and unscrupulous money makers exploiting the common realm to extract as much profit as possible at the loss of even readability in a majority of scenarios. and there is no *legal issue* with this kind of deterioration of what could in some sense be a public space in some sense that has been overtaken by a private negligence, selfishness, and greed that defaces and devalues it. perhaps this is a shared business model and yet it is also rotten, and so like driving through a wasteland of a ruined environment, the webpages and internet is like seeing broken buildings using a broken vehicle, driving on broken roads and thoroughfares, with collapsed and dilapidated structures and a giant signs HUMANS ARE THE ENEMY everywhere you look and turn, mocking people with the brazen disregard for sensibility, honesty, everything in your face and hateful, tending towards the worst content and worst innuendo, and this is normalized as the shared realm of public and private exchange, online. and in that context people and mass media and states are communicating about what presidents say, about wars and war making and terrorism, and about poverty and illness and disease and the inability of society to meet its needs while others sit at the top of this giant heap of societal dung and count their money earned by selling the broken society to begin with. so the first observation is that the state is fucked. completely utterly and irreversibly fucked. its core code is rotten and the effects of this are everywhere, including in peoples mindsets and decision-making that is born of this ideology, reinforcing the binary perspective from previous generations that has become an an error-reliant inaccurate biased POV that is allowing this exploitation to continue under the shield of "legalese", yet which itself is ungrounded and turns the signage of language into truth and thus internalizes the world within a private communication about it where this communication becomes the truth, via language that can control and overpower another perspective, not via honest evaluation of truth. thus language games in place of actual justice, and this normalized, 'codified'. businesses themselves hiding behind this code, lawyers by their side, to allow any kind of extractive process of data or money to occur, no liability yet allowing swindles cheating and corporate and institutional theft to be legalized, without public benefit even, and citizens data and material existence then become natural resources to be exploited, further extracting every last available bit for someone else to profit from, while they see nothing in return except choices of skinnerian behaviorism, lives becoming mouse mazes, the less money you start with the sooner trapped and the whole society about siphoning off goods and resources, winnowing the few who proceed upward, stopping the rest in the lower middle class, and then breaking down people and pushing them further and further until at the bottom of society in unrecoverable circumstances, the societal trap door of poverty enforced as part of an ideological agenda, religious belief needing the failures to be the immoral castigated many who justify the superiority of everyone above- yet it is the result of gaming the state and its collapse in a pyramid scheme that enslaves the many to prop up the false perspective benefiting the very few who actually believe all the B.S. because it most benefits them, as if some kind of twisted utopia for psychos who are unconcerned about others beyond their private boundaries. if you consider [crypto] in this economic, political, social context, actually the broken cryptographic systems actually massively benefit this exploitative scheme entirely at every level, both as secrets and security. it provides an impenetrable wall of ideology that, alongside the Binary Crypto Regime, allows a type of reinforced inevitability of the solution, *if only you could do the math you would realize how great all this is*. and so double/triple schemes this may be so, never underestimate humanity, yet for those uninitiated it is hellishly terrifying, especially the closer you are to the bottom where these dynamics grind down the lowest layers and push people prematurely into caskets or have no ethics in discriminating against those unlike, who have no protection against exploitation and even violence against them, yet viewed seemingly as the greatest threat because they are using resources that belong to others, as if only takers en total. what is also most evident is the role of neurolinguistic programming (NLP) in federal, state, corporate, educational and institutional contexts to use 'brute force language' to engineer a particular kind of next iteration, as if this one-way language manipulation has replaced shared reasoning, due to the loss of empirical truth and its accounting, and an unrestricted triumph of relativism and its authoritarian agenda of administering the next wave of the self-same ideology, yet with their own people, no more charade with mr. and mrs. nice anymore. its just their people now, The State, Inc.- whether it is business, government, education, health care, community. how do things get this fucked up unless that is what you're aiming for? and this in this way it is truly MASTERFUL. brilliant. the art of the state. so in this context there is an issue like /taxes/ that when the state began had to be figured out from a condition of injustice and revolt which led to a new independent society and democratic form of governance. feedback-based in principle. and then over centuries this short-circuited due to limits in the code and its interpretations, say equal rights for women, then citizens and various other fracturings from a once shared POV of private men that were assumed to be 'the public', that is, within western european history, and over time these conditions changed and yet the underlying code did not that led to contradictions and even INVERSIONS that could force breakdowns of the same society via exploits and hacks that challenged the processing and upon Supreme Court or other legal review, flip bits somewhere and the larger situation was transformed for everyone, changed by smaller events elsewhere. and the state has both continued its development towards human improvement while similarly deteriorating at the same time, its faulty code and programming the source of its own self-destruction and annihilation, such that /truth/ has been replaced by unrestricted and unregulated and essentially 'unchecked' /power/ via this biased, relativistic framework in which - oh, i don't know - the world's largest military machine and global spy network operate under, in an inaccurate and biased private viewpoint for mass surveillance and the hunt for terrorists- which can thus be skewed an distorted to focus on citizens instead who may question these dynamics, which then turns public consciousness into the enemy of this secrets-based and heavily secure tyranny, indistinguishable from a dictatorship yet not accounted for this way, as the dictator is hidden, out of sight, etc. and so the false perspective reigns and rules over 'what can be reasoned' and if anyone crosses that line, the private police enforcers and spies are at your doors and suddenly all your e-commerce goods are being shipped broken. and thus taxes are supporting this lawless takeover of the government and yet it is also inevitable due to the way the state is configured and the code it is running on and for lack of a better alternative, until that can be presented- this is the situation. so, some sympathy for the dictator. though if the options are destroyed by tyrannical actions then you got real problems because then the leader is insane and functioning against the shared state, in that the agenda becomes antihuman, aligned with machines and the continuation and development of the automated machinery of state, which in terms of the ideology are godless, yet involves a priesthood of technocrats - including programmers and technologists and business people, for whom this system is operating under their guidance and parameters and towards their goals, which have become detached from the citizenry itself. so there is the aspect of enslavement, disenfranchisement of populations based on discrimination and sliding-scale rulesets preferring some over others and also rewarding violence against citizens in its ecosystem. and the entire population is wired to automatically support this via taxes yet the /feedback/ is not occurring to improve their own basic situations as the erosive aspects of cultural decline outweigh everything else and in this constant pressure, break down and dissolve connections and structures required for survival, including loss of meaningful work, family units, education related to the world that exits versus citizens trained as if robots, and 'media' that devolves everything into an animalistic context, nearly pre-literate, not in the McLuhan sense of higher understanding of oral or other cultures, and instead- inculcating ignorance, bias, hatred, factionalism, racism, and this via false-perspectives as if 'shared POV'. no one required to align or attest or be held accountable for truth, instead ENRONOMICS rules, you can game the system and win at every level, and thus it involves the takeover by these same forces of the environment and state itself- its bureaucracy falling hostage to such an ideology, and citizens no longer having a government which represents the public's needs. this is relativistic private government taken to its extreme: tyranny, yet not only that- CRYPTO dictatorship. and yet it started out as a public and private government with human ideals and orientated to life, and instead has become antihuman and polluted, ideologically, environmentally and in minds and bodies, and focused on death and money as if the highest good. and so it is a question- where is /truth/ within this government- does it even exist? and it would seem that for the ideologically invested, the truth is the surface event, the signage and ideological actions that as imagery reinforce a particular viewpoint conducive to true belief-- that money is the most important, and that these people believing themselves superior really are in control, and that they justify this enslavement based on their private agenda and goals. and thus the *secrets and security* of the crypto state could align with this binary belief system and seemingly be its support structure, including for keeping tabs on all the exploited, as if in an excel spreadsheet, to determine futures via routing to the appropriate cattle chutes, whether death panels or poor schools or blacklists. everyone surveilled for their profit. whereas another truth could coexist beyond or along-side of this and yet remain hidden from the binary ideological which is bounded by its self-validation, pattern matching via limited and controlled observation and thus observer bias the threshold for 'shared reality' and shared goals. instead of relying on the corrupted and error-ridden code of pseudo-truth and its role in 'development' of business, education, healthcare, etc via lies, distortion, self-serving exploitative agendas- instead another actual [truth] could exist that is shared, that involves a different context for issues of /security/ and /secrets/, and cryptographic systems and their applications also would span into this realm of activity, by default of its service to the soul of the state, to ensure long-term functional integrity and this can be assumed based on indications such a parallel agenda exists. it would seem most [crypto] in the profane model would be functioning in a different set of parameters than in the more sacred and militarist model, whereby enforced ignorance and outright corruption is not the rule or law. and thus the cosmic setup and making preparations for this to be resolved. --- rebooting the state --- it concerns me to be called before a judge because i do not believe the state is a legal entity and believe i can readily prove this to be the case, and therefore not recognizing the legality of the state to decide in matters of law would be contempt of court, from my previous understanding. and in this way, to be imprisoned for not recognizing its authority to determine what is just or to be able to enforce the right principles within law as it exists due to a failed constitutional context. i run it over in my head, the argument of having private man define what is a human predicament, and thus 'mankind' and 'his' and history stand in for humans and women as an ideological bias which, while once public, became private upon equal rights, including for those other other ethnicities yet this privileged hierarchic onsesided perspective has been institutionalized as if representing the total public via the shared private views of men, and in the attempts to equalize it, has further privatized other views of women and ethnicities, into a many privates worlds situation without a coherent shared framework to call or reason as 'the public' of us all. 'the human' is missing. the human state is non-existent, and the private state of various wo|men and their private rights rule over humanity, the subset governing as if superset, yet without higher ideals, instead lower. the constitutional code is corrupt. and yet in its description it has the rules to deal with this: call a Constitutional Convention and start again. yet in a society run by relativism there is no ability to 'reason' beyond the privatized ideological "theoretical" discourse whereby power politics determines what is true (pT=>0) and then rubber-stamps via institutions under its guidance to manufacture consent and thus: represent 'the people' whereby only some truth is allowed that only benefits some people at the expense of everyone else. unbalanced, biased, onesided most times, really. so-- dealing with MASS ILLITERACY here, since the education system fell to relativistic ideology and binary bias as a teaching and indoctrination method, the rote exercises and standardized tests indication that no actual thought it allowed, no thesis - antithesis -> synthesis in western culture anymore, unless of an ungrounded politically correct version based within *language* and about the [signs] or appearance of shared views, yet without the truth shared or grounded in this false perspective. thus, foundations of belief are built on weak and corrupt 'ideas' and 'concepts' which have also become the mainstream discourse -and- POLICY BASIS for the state-- that is, skew distortion warping and bias as the reasoning for shared decision making and governance. whose that benefiting when *celebrities* are the best at taking on such an acting role of serial killer fiction. so someone calls a constitutional convention and no one is capable of *reasoning* about what is happening in the shared situation because many are essentially BELIEVING THEIR OWN BULLSHIT on ego-reliant frameworks based on ideological bias and error, into a too simple assessment of truth that is pre-enlightenment at this stage, pre-western culture even, devolved to a realm of selfish idiocy and stupidity that only self-indulgence can really offer to the existing degree. thus, everyone is a celebrity in their own private facebook and twitter worlds and speaking their own languages from their own perspectives and talking the talk, in so far as it profits and is allowed in models of pseudo-truth-- not the nails hard empirical realm where errors in thinking are not allowed or acceptable for shared frameworks-- this is beyond or before scientific method which similarly fails via privatized empiricism (also perspective limited via 'history' and thus privatized, allowing aggressions against humans in that framework by way of distortions, errors- exploited, targeting enemy populations, etc). yet a lot of people can 'program' yet it is stuck in bias and ideological frameworks and therefore very smart "binary thinking" gets nowhere in the real world of paradox, to deal with problems and situations as they exist rather than as they are perceived to- which is a tremendous difference and requires actual difficult and painful and humbling considerations and it is quickly realized how little a person knows- versus to presume to know all by sharing a viewpoint beyond external correction or acknowledging that there is bias or distortion or even unknowing involved- theorized POVs rule, the ego of private identities as if public, as if shared views, yet without the rigor or political suffering that involves beyond 'the drama'. and thus soap operas of initiatives, everyone wearing their private causes and yet outside an actual PUBLIC CONTEXT and language and social relations and importantly -- identity -- that would allow the issues to be dealt with beyond adolescent playpen antics and excitements and temper tantrums. here or there someone probably assassinated for actually doing something wrong, though who knows, maybe that too is drama and they are in deep state now. and logic is crucial, yet absent as an accounting of 'reasoning' which instead like NLP becomes programming via onesided binarisms competing up on the various electronic stumps, trunks, and platforms. 3-value and N-value logic, the basis for /human/ reasoning in a neutral evaluation as observer are not taught in schools. everything is 'rationalized' yet in pseudo-truth and thus an infinite many viewpoints that do not add up to more because they rely on the errors and distortions as structural scaffolding, on the bias and ideology to uphold views, as is necessary of private language- women as bad as men, ethnicities exploiting this as much as others, that is the game it involves and everything and everyone devolves as a result. The State needs to be rebooted under new constitutional code, at the very least modified from a context of public and private man, mankind, and history to that of public humanity and private wo|men, involving a shared his|her-story or human story. corporations embodied as 'individuals' as 'private men' have allowed extreme competition with citizens to the point that the state is representing corporate democracy via 'the public' vote, the citizens are Microsoft, Google, Time-Warner, CBS, Halliburton, etc. those not part of the structures are serfs, indentured class, castes. whereas in a human context, the state would need to serve not exploit human goals and values as part of a shared community, not gain profit based on exploiting and brainwashing or cheating people in retrograde schemes or outright criminality via selling broken equipment to normalize thievery. the human context for law would likewise not be able to ignore such truth as it would be allowed and not censored as a viewpoint via relativism. and likewise /security/ and /secrecy/ would likewise change to serve humanity and differentiate and focus on those seeking to abuse and exploit instead. it is this last statement that is assumed the underlying hidden, secret aspect of existing crypto systems of the state, a standing reserve that is waiting in the wings, surveying the situation so it can be accounted for. as of my recollection at this point, it is unknown if i am the only person who could make this case for the illegality of the state in its existing functioning, yet anyone who were to deny the court its legality would potentially be able to make this case, if willing to go to prison and get the process underway, though the argument would need to be allowed else you may never get out of prison, which is why it seems a worst case scenario, unless that situation would be the first opportunity to make the case. and this in a context of what is proposed to be *ungrounded legal frameworks* due to ideological language relied on for 'shared relativistic reasoning' which functions as /programming/ again, as if shared though of unshared society, continually set at odds with itself, functioning against itself, increasingly nonsensical and illiterate-- schizophrenic even, as the views do not add up to a coherent whole, the parts make their sum impossible, as it tends towards shared nothingness- not towards life or greater being. in this way, ignorance is progressively institutionalize, made into rules and increases suffering, making it more and more difficult to 'reason' within the broken world and relate to others in their privatized biased views. statisticians become the new community organizers for the disenfranchised and lost, tallying peoples identities with others moreso than communities themselves or organizations, the alienating and isolation near complete, such that the internet and WWW as stage set appear as if by divine right to allow each actor their fantasy to portray, without restriction to reality, obligation or duty to another, as if life only a game, frivolity behold. no sense of the pending doom awaiting, the trap door beneath the spotlight. the word as a mirror then, and the networked playground for narcissists that on a psychological level reveals the deep and hidden contempt and shallowness of the economic, social, and political ideology of self-bias. you need at least two people to call a constitutional convention, yet what if it is flash mobbed and a million relativists show up with bullhorns? here: "use our code! use our code!" they start screaming in unison. that is it in its entirety, all that binary relativistic reasoning needs to keep things as they are and further extent the situation towards shared falsity. that is why there are guns i am guessing. make a perimeter. only logical reasoning allowed, and at every instance the binary will be defeated in its simplism and will no longer be enshrined as law nor ideology nor allow for the corrupt rule of the many by the few who do not realize how crazy they actually are, nor how completely hollow and sold-out as human beings. my wager is i can prove the state in its current form is unconstitutional and provide the logical framework for making that case, and offer a set of corrective actions that would neutralize the existing bias, recontextualize its constitutional framework via what are essentially structural "edits" based on logic, to remove known ideology, and this could allow a framework for establishing or reconsidering the constitution via a convention once "ideas" themselves are back on the table, versus extending programmatic language according to biased rulesets held in pseudo-empirical books that skew this way or that depending on the forces at work, depending on words and signs versus on truth and logical reasoning as the basis for judgement and decision-making, in that ideas must be mediated at the level of 1/0. anything else is an ungrounded concept, a fiction, a theory by comparison, an assumption based on previous assumptions, which is what ideology is: basing reasoning on previous answered questions versus asking them anew. really asking questions versus skipping the truth and relying on the structure as if 'wholly true' and not involving skew, say of history as this may influence perspective and limit certain 'shared observations' by promoting a private framework for evaluation. and the consequences of this. i do not want to go to prison to get the conversation started, mainly because i would probably never get out, as 'logical reasoning' has no place within these state systems and instead they are mediating relations based on power and shared private ideology at that. perhaps high-minded Supreme Court is the actual and best platform to evaluate these state code errors accurately and authorize the necessary edits to reframe and recontextualize the state in a new human framework where citizens have a responsibility to the state, both public and private, and that in return the state will serve humanity, including by reconceptualizing the monetary system, business relations and obligations to environment and the state development, education, health and in general- the shared awareness and well-being of those of shared destiny. if the code of the Constitution is in error, it must be error-corrected-- this is not Microsoft Windows-- or, actually, it is The State as Windows, broken windows everywhere, made to break, made to be exploited, for profit. that is, the corruption is a downward spiral as private business model, and perhaps this is part of the crypto gambit itself, providing instruments to enable and sustain the deterioration, as the codebase moves towards babel. fragile error-ridden code that needs to be enforced by power politics and bullying as if "reasoning" via violence and intimidation based on shared bias of binary ideology, versus robust thinking based on shared empirical truth in a gray-area of consideration and evaluation, paradoxical, real, wanting to debate the hypothesis and even have observations show wrong or faulty to learn and improve upon frameworks, win/win interactions within debate versus stand-offs with true believers who ignore truth instead, and pick and choose their private reality and believe their bubble state will always exist the way it is, versus be popped and fall to another worldview. the requirement is strong relations between individuals and groups based on logical reasoning-- that existed as the empirical basis for development of the U.S. Constitution and would be required as a prerequisite again to be able to fairly and accurate model issues of the state beyond a partial too-limited biased viewpoint of the shared citizenry. It may be the first real 'public' state in that it would be the first human state in existence, seemingly, in terms of the specific requirements for the appropriate kernel of truth by which to align all other actions and interrelated activities within its structural arrangement. it may actually allow 'America' to be the potential envisioned, beyond the limits of history, and truly finally offer options that have existed as potentials yet have not be allowed within the limited frameworks due to unshared language, logic, and observation that could not be reconciled by ever-narrowing private POVs. this is to assume that shared value of the state is [truth] at its core, and that logical reasoning must be error-corrected at this level for ideas to be given their value, and not to assume this or allow it for the pseudo-truths that rely on false frameworks and errors if not outright lies that have become protected by the ideology of law instead, in service to shared falsity that endlessly exploits the citizenry to serve the powerful few. perhaps the most important issue underlying this transformation would be a new currency that could function in a realm of data exchange and allow for fidelity with transactions and relations as they exist, as infrastructure of interconnected relations that feed this motivational current throughout the state, yet which has no data dimension today in terms of its fractional values, such that .001 may be a useful measure for online contexts, or that taxation could be automated into the currency itself, so that it is not an issue of people relying on third-party accountants to balance their books and instead it is part of the feedback process inherent in the currency itself, taking the bureaucracy out of bureaucracy and allowing money to be friction free in terms of exchange, and allow various interactions that are instead limited by broken and biased models of accountability that punish those without money the most, making it impossible to function in society as if they are cheating because the system itself is broken, when instead the very tax forms do not have the basic information to allow the literate to do their own taxes, even in the most expected scenarios of Social Security payments-- both at state and federal levels, instead obfuscation and then the setup, the threat of holding individuals accountable for the errors, as is the social services game, working against the poor, rigging the system for failure, using pressure and oppressive subversive actions to try to indict criminality based on broken systems used to frame citizens who dare try to live beyond the limits, and escape conveyer belt to the awaiting cardboard coffin, paid for by web advertising tattooed on skull. ... "the very interaction in a context of verifiable truth is the weakness of liars who need to sustain the shared lie in order to function" - /tells/ would be automatic as circuitry grounds to falsehood versus truth. (so you're talking about an inversion, huh?) enforced illiteracy versus freedom of ideas, based on securing of truth within the state, making it foundational and defining reasoning based on logic and accounting within accurate models, concepts, and hypotheses, using the human observer as the basis for shared empirical viewpoint. --- why cryptography matters --- programming consciousness, building peer relations, feedback based tools, 'know and develop your circuitry', self as circuit, ideas as circuits, models and concepts as circuits. fundamental knowledge and exchange based on shared value (T) built from the ground up, literally, electromagnetic. tools for thinking, tools for literacy, for grounded empiricism, education in hardware/software models, logical reasoning as the basis, to allow for it and develop it, share the techniques, guidelines/guidance, for debate of ideas, litmus, standards, crack the ideological code. the code potential. issue of pattern matching to the wrong model: binary [crypt.1] / paradoxic [crypt.2] -- it is in the unknown, or the known unknown -of its capacity- that the cryptographic could establish a model for programmatic LITERACY that someday may be the basis for shared awareness outside the realm of secrets and secrecy and instead between citizens within new parameters of relation and exchange, whereby the existing model is transformed... antihuman [observer.1] <---> human [observer.2] wherein all exchange is biased to the following dynamic: antihuman [observer.1] <---- human [observer.2] antihuman [observer.1] <---> antihuman [observer.2] Instead, this could be transformed by logical accounting for truth in biased and ungrounded 'theoretical' models reliant upon shared and sustained falsity, thereby invalidating the 'shared perspective' and requiring actual [truth] as the measure for shared human observation... human [observer.1] <---> human [observer.2] the antihuman viewpoint relies on shared bias as the basis for shared awareness, 'shared ideological belief' essentially, and would be replaced by shared empirical models of truth based on *logical reasoning* (not shared binary bias) via 3-value and N-value evaluations. in each instance the /crypto/ would be different, in particular the second example whereby exploited or compromised crypto could be feeding a false perspective, leading to example three where a surveillance state could be internally believed serving this private ideological constituency yet also be backdoored elsewhere, beyond the limit of their models of awareness. the fourth, last example being the future or other hidden crypto systems that a future state may develop in terms of a line of demarcation between the human and antihuman interactions, in that security and secrets occur in that realm of conflict in terms of unshared identity, goals, values, etc. and thus likewise, 'money' or 'currency' in these differing scenarios, taxes or politics or social services, etc. what is true is true. and then there are also black swan events that challenge the model, its assumptions. either/or, both/and, neithor/nor, switches and electronic circuits as they relate to relations of observers, set theory dynamics as daily encounters. war and peace in a realm of language and bureaucracy, hidden within logic, its lack of accounting. security through obscurity or the deep strategy. nothing like communicating like a barking animal, rawr rawwr rawrrrr!!!! rowwf! ROF! WROFF! wwwWWRRRAAOAOOFFFFFFFFF!@!@@^... --- more on crypto model --- there is truth, there is logic, and logical reasoning in turn which mediates 'ideas' - evaluating patterns and constructing hypotheses via concepts and models. T <-> logic <-> reasoning <-> [ideas] so if you have /binary/ logic, you get binary reasoning and binary models and thinking, whereby if a pattern is matched, it is by default 'true'. T <- binary reasoning <- [pattern match] thus is the structural bias that if pseudo-truth is the value [pT] then false absolutism inherently includes error in this 'accounting for truth' as if it is purely true versus reliant on skew, distortion, error, etc. in this way the image or sign=sign is an ungrounded validation of the ideas if they are only 'partially true' yet not recognized as such, thus ungrounded in the total idea said to be represented. normalization and reliance upon false positives to prove sustain extend the false perspective modeling. this is the ideological approach of binary programming as 'philosophy'. it is the Binary Crypto Regime belief system, as if 1/0 is guru accessible via choosing beliefs in private frameworks of relativistic observations, often based on power and privileged perspectives, whether biz or tech celebrity, popular professor or self-righteous activist. the skew is the twl and thus the pT<->T gap is the security and secrecy exploit, a structure made to be exploited, yet it may not be recognized in the mindset itself in terms of lack of accurate self-reflection, thus a psychological flaw in the observer that tends towards psychopathy, narcissism, and anti-human agendas or so life experience offers that as an evaluative framework to consider, perhaps only validated when the have their extermination camps up & running or the existing ones are revealed: poisoning environment, food, minds, etc. what was realized upon sharing the model of crypto in relation to language was that programming functions as a form of reasoning, and so considering that there are limits to binary programming versus paradoxical, in terms of the code possibilities of linear versus nonlinear evaluations, this also holds true for 'ideas' and conceptualizations of what exists as it exists and what must be held outside the frameworks because they cannot account for anomalies-- the binary ideology is reliant on censoring and throwing out data that does not conform, whereas the paradoxical 3-value and N-value models retain this 'fine detail' of various intricacies of interstructural dynamics as a basis to discern more accurate (shared, empirical) frameworks and in this way *trash is treasure*, or the relation between archaeology and architecture, past and future meeting in the present with a question. 1 <-> logical reasoning <-> [ideas] if you get the ideas right, grounded in truth, the concepts and models, then the code 'as language' is going to accurately mediate this relation between /signs/ and the things they represent, or ground to, in/as truth. 1 <-- [code] <-- programming in this way, if the 'ideas of code' are accurately modeled and grounded, their implementation would be validated by truth and its error-correction of the faulty code would be vital to securing truth within the model 0 <-- [pT.code] <-- 'binary reasoning' * whereas a worldview and model based on an unfalsifiable approach that is removed of error correction may have 'some truth' though its further and further reliance on error-reliant frameworks would continuously move this 'shared view' closer and closer to zero, instead of 1, via the increasing dissolution of truth within a larger ever expanding framework of falsity. in a complex multiple-use model involving deception, such unaccountable code could not only be used as an exploit, the programmatic assumption could itself be exploited via social engineering of the ideological mindset and thus the very viewpoint is as insecure as the codebase is made to be: 1/N/0 <-- pT/T.code <-- 'binary/paradoxial-reasoning' There could be a massive deception hidden within this context, not only of the binarists who exploit broken crypto to surveil and steal from others, including the state itself, though have no indication of anomaly allowing their mirror-looking to see the other side of the one-way view, thus other encryption alongside yet invisible, additional 'truth' inside or outside binary models of 'pseudo-truth' yet unable to be reasoned, pattern matched and instead thrown out as errors, ignored. superposition of truth, its contingence on observation and how logic effects what can be reasoned to exist. and this is where /programming/ essentially is a form of reasoning and yet 'the debate' is not occurring at the level of language in words and viewpoints of people- in that this level of [code] is needed to communicate and model ideas within society, to align with conceptual structures like programmers must to attain functionality of developed intermechanisms and yet at the level of individual and group discourse this system of relation and communication is broken within institutions, schools, and society, such that only a binary viewpoint is allowed and proceeds and is rewarded yet at a cost to civilization and life itself, due to the servitude to enforced stupidity. instead, the ability to comprehend this situation of communication as [code] is needed firstly to be able to think and evaluate accurately, to use language and mathematics in a meaningful grounded way, and not arbitrary or mindlessly reproducing copies of copies of ideas that are now ideologies, adding more and more noise and losing the original truth or signal that instead is no longer accurate because the context is changed and it needs to be reevaluated as model, yet everyone appears ILLITERATE else unwilling and unable to do this, because they have more important things to do like wax their egos or manicure their stellar lifestyles. in other words, in some fundamental sense: programming is logical reasoning and tools could be made to develop these skills via the distributed net of mobile platforms that would help people learn how to think, how to evaluate situations in empirical frameworks, help understand probability, looping hypotheses, binary limits and issues of absolutism that are unreal in the ordinary sense (too simple, thus dumb and inculcating ignorance via viewpoint), and provide platforms to link thoughts and ideas and concepts in structural frameworks as a new foundation for the next internet as a shared POV and organization of data that is meaningful and has purpose beyond private views and agendas, and limits of copyright for truth, etc. so the relation of "logical reasoning" with [language] and [mathematics] in terms of concepts, ideas, algorithms, models, yet also "programming" of this CODE that may remain or be sustained by cryptographic means and methods in terms of deep culture and the sustaining of literacy beyond the ordinary mainstream boundaries, its metaphysical dimensions and source. in this, the role of cryptography perhaps at the unifying juncture of the two cultures as they are reunited in [code] and establish LITERACY across the total domain, moving from esoteric to revealed knowledge and awareness. the philosophical dimension, context, and goals of programming and role of debate and protection and extension of freedom of ideas and language within the era of computer development lost to social engineering via technology, its tools and platforms to promote this ignorance, falsehood, functioning against truth and shared awareness, against ideas, feedback, democracy. the ideology too small for the ideas, the ideas to large for the logic, and in turn the corruption replacing insight with ego, as the basis for exchange in a shallow hollow realm of exchange and relation fundamentally antihuman. *key is whether the observer is aware of their own observation, their own code, and can correct and account for errors or relies upon them for observation. can the observer observe themselves or do they realize their observations are observed by others, which is a basis for objective views in that many views of the same event can help error correct for distortion or unknowns yet if all assume the same views, these are reinforced instead. --- ye ol crypto system --- to the tangible future of a human managed society and state based on shared truth-- it would be possible to transform the issues of today into a new context and capture the /truth/ that exists buried within the complexity overlapping agendas, human and inhuman, and align the activities of the public and private state in accordance with human needs and goals. such as with a new digital monetary system and taxes, and education that teaches citizens how to think via logical reasoning, to raise consciousness and capacity through learning and developing skills, towards optimal and highest functioning - and to realign goals of bureaucracy to serve the citizens instead of function against them, such as regularity agencies that establish a framework to reclaim a healthy non-toxic environment and return areas of wilderness to their natural state, such as removal of vast areas of sprawl and reimagine city planning and transportation systems and other approaches to human development in a more efficient, effective, humane and livable approach. the issue of these marketing firms and advertisers collecting vast data for sale on any citizens is in parallel to state surveillance issues and could be legally abolished as a practice, with limits to what can be collected and requiring a citizen to allow such tracking for market research and nothing beyond this. that would be legally enforced and corrupt systems that surveil as business models would be taken down, go out of business due to the illegality of a massive private surveillance regime due to code exploits of constitutional errors, allowing private businesses to profit on public extortion, expropriation, devaluing of name and identity, stealing of information, and various other forms of theft, fraud, schemes for the blacklisting and framing or intimidation of others via such practices, especially and particularly in a political and ideological context, where your local business is tallying your presence here and there and gaining profit off such data as a business model, reinforcing the tyranny. there is no place for this lawlessness, this bullying and intimation within a 'free' society unless it is no longer beholden to its constitutional framework and there is nothing to protect citizens from the exploitation of their data. it is not an issue of regulating it-- it needs to be abolished. in contrast, state surveillance is potentially somewhat a windfall for a future society where electronic health records, dental, taxes, billing, taxes, income, work history, education documents, and other dossiers could become a repository for citizen data that they should be legally allowed to access -- based on transparency and within limits of security models in terms of actual secrecy and security issues it may involve. such that you probably would not have access to FBI or CIA assessments though should rightfully have everything else, and it should be *accurate* data and not full of lies, distortions, false perspectives-- and this needs to be the right of every citizen to have accurate data profiles (A=A) and not full of documents that distort information to onesided views based on corrupted and self-serving authority or political agendas. so here's the idea- and the critical role of cryptography in this... basically these federal and state databases can become future 'electronic records' for citizens, so that all dada is stored in a shared accessible model and can be accessed from anywhere via the network, such that schools can send data to those files and logins can allow shared access for those whose files they are. then, for instance, if the government has a issue such as social security, all the data is in one place and the reference information is available from multiple locations, not duplication or triplication or quadrupling of efforts or reliance on postal mail, paper and stamps and delivery networks to get snail mail validation. ZONING would be the primary structural issue, what are the perspectives for the combined total database, say federal and state, though also health education work taxes and onward, though an entire life could be stored in the model, from childhood to old age. and yet these could be more than documents, it could also involve a concept of a citizen, a model or 'individual circuit' that they develop for their goals in life and their circumstance, issue and skills unique them, and through this empirical context and grounding, everyone including teachers and family and doctors and the state could access this data model as it relates to the individual conceptualization, their direction of development, and map lives into and onto and through this data modeling as a model of education, health, career, citizenry. to do this would require shared keys, and an infrastructure reliant on both security and secrecy in varying scenarios, depending on the exchange, and to what degree the data is made accessible. for instance a doctor visit could have the medical records opened for a one-week window for updates via key exchange, or an educational institution may hold keys for each student that updates their coursework yearly or by semester yet otherwise is closed down and secured in the state model, under watchful eye, protected. this too could occur with monetary exchange accessed through a substructure so employers payroll is automatically figured, and micro-taxation that could be automatic to currency could be tabulated and tallied and recorded in this central location and instead of taking money out and then returning it later, avoiding this lunacy for a just-in-time model where money accounts for its own existence and has identity yet does not create friction that prevents monetary relations or exchange, allowing money its fluidic power. the individual citizen then could be given a crypto key that is somehow attached to an object, equivalent in some way to a social security card with specific ID number, yet with an authentication scheme based on a single unique entanglement (assuming classical quantum infrastructure is out in the open) and thus the key has unique physical bits that ensure specific entanglements with other paired bits elsewhere, that could be connected to this central database of state. and from that, entangled further into a physically-based model of crypto, additional crypto keys that coexist in that domain within infinity-models, that generate the everyday keys for accessing bank or school records or circuit diagrams of the self as a life plan, the society actively involved and supporting development of itself in a shared framework of relations and exchange, ideas and intention, purpose and possibility for human civilization. in other words, a person would carry a device that would be a keychain and have many active keys that are validated by an underlying state key that generates these others via physical hardware entanglement, perhaps a qbit-blackbox or something on a smartcard, yet its detachment from the person also could invalidate the key as it is a unique one-time correlation and thus to forge it would collapse the entanglement, and other monitoring would track occurrences to prevent outside manipulations via biometric or other verification of identity. speculative, most entirely unknown though seemingly feasible in the abstract, where the physical key of door/lock is updated into a future realm of entangled crypto keys as citizen ID, that then is a validation/verification system for establishing remote trust for other subsystem crypto exchange via related or embedded key systems that could be added to the keychain. perhaps the quantum key resides within a home and only activates the other keys yet need not be carried around once activating them, and thus provides a physical security barrier or air gap that could bound any attack into the larger network or database system by whatever local key is accessed illegally, thus establishing perimeter defenses or other protocols to diagnose or act on the anomalous events. it is questionable if such a keychain or crypto key system would involve tracking by default, if not just in a data model given that the state may have access to this information if needed, and thus in an emergency it may change 'zone' settings, open up the cell network, track a person down and ring their phone to let them know of a connected event via automated call, or other such functionality, though otherwise data could be anonymized and sensor networks and others would only focus on actual threats versus dragnet the entire citizenry under hypersurveillence atmosphere where the entire society is criminalized and made passive via fear of state violence and retaliation for speaking differently or going against political party line, which is the daily situation in its economic, social, political context as engineered by the binary ideologists to exploit as is. in this way, crypto keys could differentiate zones of public from private and there could be state secured databases protected by law, whereby like a safe deposit box, information could be stored or this could be linked within the home as well, decentralized, though in some sense 'security' and 'secrecy' of a private nature could be protected via these lawful resources that would only under extraordinary measures be accessible by the state, under oversight, and monitored to ensure they are protected by government. for instance, someone may want photos of their granddaughter to be passed on to her after the grandparents pass, and she has children, and such documents could be stored in such a place, as data files. maybe that is not the idea of others, though it is in contrast to the 'fear the state' model if it were to exist in a context of human values, where these rights and principles and ideas are protected, then the database could be citadel, a protected zone that will continue even if the house burns down or a parent dies and that data can be accessed and it is part of the process of life within a context of electronic information and data resources like these. the larger aspect is that such a tiered crypto system then could involve house keys, vehicle keys (for eventual antigravity landspeeders i hope), 'money keys' (access to currency, currency as information), state database keys (subset: health, education, career, psychology, etc). etc. the crypto infrastructure would be vital to establishing, sustaining, and securing and protecting the state and its citizenry, in addition to its role in secret communication which may take on other parameters in such a 'shared identity' context, whereas other realms could involve unshared identity and involve tactical, strategic, operational crypto for other environments and situations or tied into this as an infrastructure layer. say, if you're dealing with hostile robots who steal children or swap out citizens and they need to be hunted down and eliminated, and so on. parallel to this, hopefully the end of wi-fi will appear, the pollution of the environment via electromagnetic radiation and interference with the senses and nature, and regain what has been lost by toxic invisible skies continuing that terrible tradition of the first industrial revolutions, once citizens become literate that the technology is harming citizenry by unregulated design and this relates to cancer and other issues, including nefarious agendas to engineer illness, obesity, to devolve the society. those codes can be broken, dismantled, revealed for the abuses of power they involve and the antihuman agenda that the unconstitutional state is allowing to exist, terrorizing citizens as its basis for legitimacy. the true terror today is the unlawful illegal unconstitutional state today. its code is error-ridden, its ideology is completely unsound, and it is time it is accounted for and error-corrected at the scale required to change its circuitry and given humanity the chance it deserves to succeed in this life. if ever there has been a reason to fight, this is it.

1 0

[liberationtech] Is Dropbox opening uploaded documents?
by Eugen Leitl 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

Dropbox is pulling a Skype. ----- Forwarded message from Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:42:17 -0700 From: Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com> To: liberationtech(a)lists.stanford.edu Subject: [liberationtech] Is Dropbox opening uploaded documents? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 Reply-To: liberationtech <liberationtech(a)lists.stanford.edu> Found online: http://www.wncinfosec.com/dropbox-opening-my-docs/ -- Joe Szilagyi -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at companys(a)stanford.edu. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B 47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5

6 5

Breaking a CPU’s internal cryptographic mechanisms
by Gutem 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/166580-researchers-find-new-ultra-low-le… - Gutem

1 0

NSA Purchased VUPEN Subscription
by Rich Jones 16 Sep '13

16 Sep '13

https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/vupen-contracts-wi… https://muckrock.s3.amazonaws.com/foia_files/9-11-13_MR6593_RES.pdf FOIA by @ramdac Not a massive surprise, but interesting to see it in writing. Looks like this is for the standard subscription, not custom development. Although, the cost is redacted. Chaouki Bekrar is also mentioned by name. ————————————— Rich Jones * OpenWatch <https://openwatch.net>* is a global citizen news network. Download OpenWatch for iOS<https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/openwatch-social-muckraking/id642680756?ls=…>and for Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.ale.openwatch&hl=en> !

1 0

[5] moar koda
by brian carroll 16 Sep '13

16 Sep '13

disclaimer: if doing this is illegal then the alphabet is illegal and 'ideas' themselves have been criminalized by the terror state --- (continuing...) --- hint for previous code: _ |v JL 3 p\ w Z 7r : 2 6 perhaps should have made the last character (6) this instead: O J the idea then of a digraph substitution: JL = inverted T, etc. Thus, for instance if someone has a perceptual bias and is only looking at single characters as single units, the diagraph, trigraph, etc approach would be beyond their threshold of observation, beyond the perceptual modeling and thus such bias or limitation in interpretation can allow other information to exist beyond how it is perceived to exist by a given observer, unless they figure it out- so it would involve rules or learning how to determine what schemes are active or not, multiple or none further, the idea of a search of the original string as anagram or other approach, such that the breakage of units into fragments or components or elements thus can defeat brute force meaning unless checking all variables which would tend towards infinity, via probability. thus the secret is in some sense the noise, the more it is looked for the more possibilities arise and fill in the void with additional meaning that may or may not be active -- whether intended or not, which is the spooky aspect of this, if systems or data is somehow entangled whether as information and-or objects; seemingly /metaphysical keys/ even. so a hypothetical example would be, putting the original 15 characters into a structural search in which the original concept cannot be located in the analytical results (in ordinary terms, the 'word' does not exist within the letters/numbers themselves) and in this way, while it was was the basis for creating the 'string' (bit set), it may not be active in its interpretation or its activeness may exist in the permutated results and thus not require a decode by the receiver if already having the key because they know the shared reference yet the structure exists as infrastructure- and it may or may not have relevance though it could be mapped into that structure as if a conceptual root structure that could have calculative or geometric aspects- meaning, there could be many simultaneous structures some related and others not, that may or may not be activated in particular signaling, perhaps similar to neurons and synaptic structures in the brain that fire together yet whyso remains a mystery due to the limits of observation and an accurate model for analysis at the level of activity being observed- thus phrenology or scrying in an ungrounded sense providing security by enhancing warped, skewed, biased, limited interpretations, erecting walls and false rationales by "relativistic frameworks" in a realm of halls of mirrors within halls of mirrors. distortion by unknowing autogenerated, and in some sense 'signal' can be masked as noise also, shell games within the parallelism of infinity and the computational limits of parsing those dynamics accurately, which could easily exist beyond technological means thus also in the realm of literacy, 'reading the signs' or abstract markings can become the limit between those intelligent and those smart yet illiterate and not in service to the conceptual foundation involved, and their perceptual frameworks can be used to construct false perspectives that become labyrinths to control future options, yet while creating the illusion of being in a 'shared awareness' or framework (partial) whereby pseudo-truth, its reliance on error, can allow extra-dynamics to exist while also coexisting within 'some truth' of the shared condition; perhaps this is zoning within a threat containment model, or subversive takedown approach, establishing booby-traps and trap-doors and pyramid defenses so, a letter or number could be de|con-structed and words or concepts or meaning could also be tokenized by a substitute system of relation which is what symbolism also allows, a type of exchange existing with a symbol and its network of conceptual structures aligned with it, an infrastructure of shared meaning and dynamics that also has myth and magic and spiritual dimensions as a potential, these tending towards darkness and light yet also accounted for in a shared universe (U), this richness and depth then perhaps closest to the forces involved and their dynamics, versus its caricaturization that presents its substance mainly in cartoon terms, a popular culture framework as if yet another commoditized ideology, thus the assumption of surface-relations versus actual depth and core functioning --- sidenote: after the expansion --- it should be added that after a 'string' is permutated, say it goes from 15 characters into a million character / word combination space, that is in a precisely bounded model that defines the perimeters and parameters of its expansion and analysis frameworks (if not via infrastructure standards), that it would seem this is a one-way calculation and as impossible as it may be to find something inside the expanded set combinations, it would appear even more impossible (exponentially) to try to put it back into the original pandoric gift package, the originating /bit set/ even if knowing the rules and trying to apply them in reverse, to go from 'many' words to only a 'key string' as exampled here (said: bit set now, as a description of the set relations between characters, not linear string if it is "calculated" and worked-out in its probabilistic interrelations). in other words, could you go from one million characters and various word combinations back to the original 15 characters- and my presumption is no, it would be even more highly variable in reverse if computed this way, in that substitutions could occur at some point that introduce (noise) extra data, such as a S=5 and starts to shift meaning out of the original context, and so many of these shifts could occur, 'recenterings' as part of analysis, that if not having them in their entirety and evaluating a massive set, even if having the majority correct, that small area of error could continually expand as noise and veer interpretations off course and bound the backwards analysis- which could be useful if having a code that generates something yet cannot be worked back, yet still is linked to it or exists within the unpackaged expansion as an entangled conceptual order, which again may or may not be activated- say like streetlights turning on at certain hours, or animal migrations under certain conditions- the data may appear momentarily or in a given context and then be absent the next so in this way a 'noisefield' could be inherent in the expansion and messages could be hidden within it, perhaps even texts or documentation, that would be reliant on the originating bit set yet disconnected from it if not available to analyze, yet it may also have carry any signal or secrets when analysed, such that it is feasibly arbitrary, one of many frameworks, and unless knowing what the perspective is, it could be a false corridor and lead to *answers* that are inaccurate or 'counter' to the actual view yet expand into another parallel stage-set universe (U2) based on error-reliant pseudo-truth believed to be accurate yet moving further into falsity (pT-> A=B). in this way, paradox is the limit, as if logical reasoning and 'shared observation' and if identity is unshared, fiction out of what can be shared facts in a limited model based on other rationales, thus exploiting bias and other false assumptions and their structures perhaps a way of conveying this is those with a human POV versus antihuman perspective and how consciousness would be correlated differently both in observations and interrelations, especially with doubling or imposters for instance someone may perceive a human as 'racist' for an observation because of a potential interpretation that is a particular framework thus bounded reasoning to that viewpoint structure, whereby: humans {ethnicity} in terms of sets, different skin tones and cultures could be secondary to being a human being and thus 'human' would be the superset... human {ethnicity} or human {race} This versus the opposite, determining interpretations locally as if the main basis for primary awareness: race {humanity} or race {ethnicity} In other words, subset {set} if not: subset {superset}, can take on the interpretative 'universal view' (U) and it may have 'some truth' in a certain relative framework yet it may not be the larger or overriding truth of the observation and this ambiguity needs to be taken into account. say with my previous instance of a 'song here song there, here a song there a song, everywhere a song-song' as it may be viewed instead of a common rhyme instead a device to channel bias about 'yellow people' as if the intent. note also several such devices were used, not indicating this viewpoint. it is to say that multiple readings can co-exist, and there can be some partial truth (whatever truth exists is true) yet it may not be the total or overriding truth or even generative truth and instead exist as anomaly or entangled instance that arises out of noise, as with a crystal ball that takes in outside patterns and merges them into a common spheric surface. i think when i wrote that i noticed the potential ambiguity yet the idea was not that and decided to keep typing versus try to edit and invent another device for an ongoing theme (about endless communication in terms of 'linear string' assumptions as if automatically meaningful versus hollow and how a lot of people can be singing and saying *nothing* in terms of how it adds up empirically, versus fragmented relativisms which are basically noise allowing the cultural degradation to continue under that mirage of depth and hand-holding feel good hedonism, as if it is all that simple). though counter to this, it is true that certain cultures have names that align with 'song song' and thus it could be associated with that, even though that was not the interpretive framework and it could have meaning, whether or not true or accurate in the specific context, what is true is true. and thus if a military strategy and its associated ideology involves emigrating vast populations into other areas in order to subvert them, and then holds up a politically correct boundary saying it is discrimination to speak about what is going on in those terms- it probably is going to cause collisions in discourses like these, where such dynamics are mediated outside the "official silence" and politics of the everyday societies. again, humans and antihumans would be my response to this, and humans are in every culture and activity. and so they are in the superset and not viewed as 'subset'- though an antihuman ideology that tries to stop such analysis of human awareness via censoring debate or activities then is seeking to overpower and bias interpretation via unshared identity that is privileged and beyond error-checking or correction, thus requiring and demanding a safe zone of *secure interpretation* that prevents accounting for these dynamics via peer pressure, etc. essentially: antihuman {humanity} as this is institutionalized, effectively: subset {superset} if you give any credence to the higher cosmic order involved in this, such that the earth today is being governed by 'the lower' to which to higher functioning have had to adapt to allow the takeover and takedown to occur. Most excellent in terms of this cross- and intercultural dynamics is the work and ideas of Edward T. Hall, especially in terms of language and cultural systems, how signs are interpreted differently yet also in this variance the richness of truth beyond limited observations of a given view. here is the ~50 words for snow in eskimo and so on, as it relates to this same bit set issue of where someone is interpreting the data from. another possible way of conveying the approximate idea: (humans {ethnicity}) <--> (antihumans {race}) what matters is truth, who serves it and to what extent it is recognized or subverted for another agenda than the shared set, its values, goals, and principles- and this aligns also with coherence and its limits in ideology versus ideas, rigid limits to allowed thought versus freedom and liberty and serve to life or its annihilation by rules to prop up false universes, and the larger context for this being cosmic accountability and the role of crypto and both sides of these issues- that complex /ground/ of operations that could be binary or paradoxical, actually grounded or only virtually... so this gets to a basic idea of 'code' -- what do you trust? -- do you trust some cryptographic standard, do you trust a person or system or machine, do you trust 'ideas' without having parsed them completely and thus rely on 'unknown knowns' determined by others, perhaps of unshared identity and thus exploits- and to me it has become self-evident that only TRUTH can be trusted, that it is the basis for trust, and in combination with logical reasoning allows this trust to be evaluated and accounted for, and anything less is potentially an issue of 'trusting signs' in its place, mimicry or facades or ungrounded connections or relations, such that 'signs of friendship' can substitute for actual friendship, and other types of programmatic techniques whereby truth is not shared as the basis for interactions, and this occurs within 'shallow language' and 'wrong assumptions that are carried onward' within the scaffolding of viewpoints, /errors/ normalized, that devalue and degrade truth- yet become structures for *TRUST* within computing and social systems, again the Binary Crypto Regime as ideology the peak of this institutionalized untrustworthiness made into religion. Faith in crooked code, crooked administration, crooked relations, crooked ideas, and accounting in truth and via logical reasoning nowhere found outside the *protected limits*, thus allowing the antihuman agenda to proceed friction-free in fallen environments that serve this 'mastery'. if you trust in people, it is within their truth, the truth of a person not their falsity or pseudo-truth (unless mistaken) -- it is a critical distinction and of wide-ranging consequence. so too, ideas- the truth of ideas versus their approximations and warping and skew and distortion and biasing- to defend and uphold that is a corruption, a compromise that is a degradation and deteriorates whatever truth exists- thus, compromised code as if secure also compromises the person wrongly believing its integrity without being able to evaluate it in truth themselves or relying on others who are untrusted or of unshared identity to guarantee ideas through trust of technology or 'trust me' models- which if 'shared awareness' is not the same or exploited, leads to exploits. whole OS platforms built upon this and similarly exploited, though in a realm of double/triple schemes, etc. so FAITH in TRUTH and in the truth of people and in the truth of ideas, yet accounting for this truth, understanding it, being able to grapple with it versus make and build assumption upon unreliant assumption that could be built upon a threshold exploit (unknown unknowns) that bound interpretation and yet another could be decrypting everything from the start because it is built that way- just not understood by the users- thus 'trust the algorithm' without dealing with 1:1 truth allows the A:B exploit its tyrannical freedom to overlord and invisible hand events onesided. for instance, if time travel there is a high likelihood the present day would be governed from the future context and its administration over the present and taking this into account would be one approach and ignoring it another and thus 'standing lies' could be seen as part of that SCIFI framework in that actions do not add up in normal terms in day to day policy and why is it that situations are being run off the cliff regularly in parallel if not some 'beyond mainstream' policy decisions making sense of shared madness so if the truth of ideas is not dealt with, and the truth of people and the truth of machines and technology, and the truth of code itself, and not using actual *logic* beyond the binary evaluation, how much truth is there really in these systems and relations by default of ignoring the reality, and how much of the surreality that exists is based on the shared FALSE framework that allows the oppression and oppressors their advantage... thus the role of the logic bomb in taking down the kernel of the corrupt belief that sustains the lie and the code that stands in truth truth as its sign yet ungrounded, an entire standing empire built upon a too simple ideology- now that is a security nightmare waiting to happen, for those on the inside and with vested interest in seeing that it and their lifestyle continues, say versus feedback from the oppressed and exploited... payback time. --- more on bit set dynamics --- here are some additional examples of various approaches; you could use numbers in place of letters or vice versa, perhaps co-existing and thus to flip and unflip sets... A B X 1 2 24 Such that A is the first letter of the alphabet, B is second, and X is twenty-forth. it could be taken further and sent back into letters by a second pass: 1 2 2 4 A B B D Optionally, from these same numbers it could instead be reformatted in that the original 1 2 24 could become: 12 24 L X Another approach could involve flipping the bit set characters prior to or after expanded into massive constellations of data of the interiority, and thus layers of overlapping interpretation could exist from the start which could be part of the symbolic algorithm as it were: h i o x / x o ! y there is a potentiality involved that could result in different expansions and keyspaces and so it is an issue of what these are and how they could be determined or shared- perhaps in the bit sets themselves or other keys or it could be arbitrary and truly crystal ball 'seers' in given instances, altered states that may align or be shared or unshared yet deliver info also: this could occur without software in a massive distributed model yet with software tools it could be something more in-line with crypto systems of today and massive computation that probably could find ways to encode and embed programs or documents via such techniques versus SMS equivalent peer networking. say for instance the following bit set were evaluated: U SI 20 1LL 2Z O X LS Perhaps it expands into a thousand character document, and that 'X' symbol were notation that it should be twisted 45% and read at an angle, dropping out certain symbols as noise and others would be retained by symmetry or having multiple readings (say: N S Z in terms of rotation & reflection). In terms of the mirroring of language, reading upside is a useful skill or being able to have /superposition/ of alphanumbers and those substitutions in mind and parsed in real-time evaluation- perhaps relevant, perhaps not. yet a computer system could likely mine such data very effectively given rules and decipher or encipher and puzzle data back into jack-in-the-boxes that could be reused as structure, or so it is hypothesized continuing with approaches, there is a certain interesting correlation with certain letters and logic notation, such as p q p d that in their relations demonstrate mirroring and so this is part of the structural of numbers and letters that can indicate function or have distinct features as if puzzle pieces that can and cannot fit together in given parameters of co-alignment p q p d b d b q The ambiguity of this, yet also other options... b = |> <| = d etc. perhaps even |> / as a trigraph as 'twist b, thus q'. yet any of this could also be compressed or have multiple meanings depending on perspective and the framework/s for evaluation. the corollary to this is potentially sequencing of data structures though again -- not linearly. multilinearly, nonlinearly, as permutative sets, the total ecology of combined and related dynamics, CERN-level and weather forecast modeling intensities... and still there may be infinite unknowns even within the structural data if not having the keys to unlock it another foundation aspect of this is character overlap and subtractions and additions via their combined state; it is very difficult to convey without images because it can be high resolution in a standardized context (16 segment display, square UNION JACK symbol of the ancient mastercode, HIOX). and it is logic dependent in certain instances to figure out... first hint: b 8 d The numeral '8' essentially can be a character in /superposition/ whereby while the 7-segment is the seeming source for hexadecimal letters, it has a potential substitution of: A, B, C, D, E, F, H, J, L, O, P, S, U. Thus the words: bad, bed, bod, bud, in addition to other acronyms could be seen as a potential, held within the shared overlapping structure of 8. it is thus a *wildcard* bit, in terms of alphanumerics. The HIOX or union jack symbol is 26 letters + 10 numbers for a single bit, by comparison. so imagine the set evaluation of: b88d, in terms of including the hidden 13 other letters and how this may influence anagrams or other permutation combinations. In a similar way, you could have a letter 'm' and break it into two letters 'n' or invert them, 'vv' which could be mirroring 'm' or 'w'. or turned sideways and becoming 3 or E, that is, M or W. or c & c in a given view, depending on the construct. consider another approach to overlap: 3 E = 8 And further, into the larger alphabet... R L = 8 This approach would include retaining the overlapping elements, thus additive, whereas if subtractive- combining the number zero (O) sans null slash (0) and capital letter i (I) assumed having full upper and lower bars at top and bottom of vertical, would equate to an: equal always equal symbol, orientated vertically. what is dissimilar is retained. this abstraction in part required by the tools, unable to communicate most basic information for lack of standard formating and basic display of 'code' as it actually exists and is used. example of subtractive: R L = 3 Perhaps this aspect of superposition is closer to that of /spin/ for certain character features, whereas for a large capacity symbol such as '8' or HIOX it is a much more vast range of set potentials to unpack via these interrelational dynamics. --- messing with HASH --- it is still unknown if the parallel structure of a bit set as the string is comprehended, such that [xyz] could function as a string yet also co-exist in parallelism as [x|y|z] via set recombinations and expansions. [x] could be anything, say 'the internet', [y] could be pi/1.666 and [z] letters A-H. likewise, [x] could be symbol 1, say a purple dinosaur, [y] could be '8' and [z] could be symbol 2. the slot machine really is vastly variable and could involve multiply turning bounded infinities that tally in custom circuits (outerlimits of enigma), and the 'string' could also be infinite, such that both the bits and bit set could move towards infinity, such that: [infinity^1][infinity^2][infinity^3]...[infinity^N] how could any machine possibly rationalize all of that? impossible. and what if most of it is *noise*. it leads to interesting conditions for ideas and algorithms, new territories perhaps, places without any maps or infrastructure within existing _known technology. randomness, yessir. like the Moholy-Nagy painting (ref.typo error) in a previous post, there could be calculative dimensions involved in ordinary language, through its transmutation and reimagining in its 'other variability'. imagine colliding [hash 1] vs. [hash 2] and arriving at some kind of structuring... what if it is the same 'bit set' that is collided with itself, yet transformed from bit set A to bit set A'. thus A x A' = new bit set u x w h ==> y m x u == ? ? ? ? Thus it would matter if it is additive or subtractive for what the new bit set would be and what would be expanded in terms of its interiority. so what if the english alphabet is 26 letters, A-M/N-Z and you run half of these against the other, what kind of structures result. and what if you take half of the alphabet and mirror it above itself then add/substract or flip, or recombine in various ways, or two-letter sets, adjacent and non-adjacent-- suddenly it is off the map, unexplored symbolic territory perhaps, and that is seemingly something else entirely in terms of meaning; and for the naive like myself, how might this relate to various encoding schemes that use character sets and symbols for data transmission, are they substitutable or could they even function as a deep data code (signage going into and through data instead of only across as linear strings), and what kind of access/entry and egress and circulation may this allow, open up or prevent in terms of traditional data models and also processing. it would seem in some way related to a compass with magnetic north and true north, though that could be widely variant and easily polarity could be lost and someone could be heading south or 'up' or 'down' without knowing it, in flatland terms of bounded interdimensionality also, language translation, western european languages, umlauts and other details related to extra-textual cues or clues perhaps venezia & venice what would the different keyspaces expand into if only some of the structure is shared, yet the idea is essentially identical, such that the signage maps onto the same concept, empirically, via translation-- is it an issue of distortion, cultural frameworks of language that format structures and how might these be bridged or is it a limitation to the model, thus can bit set dynamics occur only in A:A frameworks or can A1:A2 also function to a threshold limit, until A:B is reached, or may it also function at A=B, insofar as the structure of A is retained within the structure of B: A <---> B{A} and further, consider if the 'translation' was a particle collision and thus the probing of molecular structuring shared and unshared between the two concepts, attaining higher resolution of their shared dynamics via interrogating their relations, grounding and mapping and testing of assumptions into a common empirical framework- as if language is the basis for conceptual infrastructure --- note on correlations --- having written about this elsewhere and forgotten a specific clarification, pattern recognition itself is about this sign=sign matching, yet assumes that the match itself equals truth and this is not the case, it is a faulty assumption and an ideology that the truth of language is in the sign itself and not what it is referencing. thus an apple would be the word apple versus an apple itself and the 'idea' of what an apple is, its potential superposition of meaning. this is the binary plague of ideas everywhere evident in technology-- the potential of technology now making toys for adolescent adults based on limited viewpoints, goals, and shared purpose. mathematics begins with patterns. understanding and deciphering them. yet it is this recognition that must occur in a A=A framework for it to be actually true (1), and thus the refinement of ideas and removing falsity from pseudo-truth and using hypotheses prior to declaring theories, as is the empirical methodology. and so TRUTH is foundational to mathematics, knowing what is true from what is false, and relating this to an A=A and A=B evaluative context, which is Plato/Aristotle and others of course. and yet if a mathematician arrives at an equation, or a person proposes a universal idea, it is not just that they have found a "pattern" that seems to fit, it is that it must correlate with other structures and patterns in their known integrity, that is "truth". so there is a relation in truth for the evaluation of truth. (thus: binary assumption of truth extends all the way to all subsequent assumptions based upon it). so testing hypotheses and ideas and equations and finding flaws is the vital process and obligation of error-correction and refinement and the changing of the model or hypothesis or pattern conceptualization so as to better align with what is known to be true, verifiably so (1=1) versus relaying on something know false and relying on its structure (1=0) for further such 'ideas' and 'equations' as an error-based structure and viewpoint, which can get religious even, and is hugely invested in the ideological, where questions have long ago been answered and unasked since even when facts and evidence refute the claims. thus limits, boundaries allow even faulty pattern-recognition to persist by keeping out error-correcting observations. and 'empirical' observation is thus limited to only those facts and views that support the claims, ideas, equations. this is why logic is so critical to determining and accounting for truth and evaluating 'structures' that supposedly carry its /momentums/. the trusswork of ideology that may be corroded to such a degree to collapse yet carry the weight of a society, these areas of weakness offlimits for any interpretation, protected by retaliatory violence to allow virtualized viewpoint to continue, while endangering all who rely upon the error-rate. the 'binary logic' that is falsely absolute yet unaccounted for can thus "exist" in a bubble civilization yet only through dictatorial tyranny that is against its evaluation, most especially in logical terms, these also being the most self-evident and only way to actually describe what is occurring as it occurs conceptually, structurally. everyone knows, yet the 'reasoning' itself is made off-limits and thus the incapacity to say for lack of a way of accurately 'recognizing' and accounting for the events. in this way a [sign] could be interpreted one way by a binarist and another by an observer of 3-value or N-value paradoxical logic. the pattern that is encountered may appear identical yet its mapping into structural frameworks of truth could be entirely different, and more accurate than another. so it is an issue of intelligence, how these signs are interpreted, and in a more general sense [patterns]. and thus C.P. Snow and the Two Cultures allows consideration of the mathematical evaluation versus linguistic, or 'literature' as a basis for this interpretation, leading to numbers and equations in the former and alphabets and writing in the latter. though perhaps with mathesis that division related to pattern recognition is of a previous era, and instead 'literacy' has moved closer whereby concepts of "programming" (ala Lewis Mumford) have "symbolic processing" as a skill that present-day once future populations were predicted to need to survive symbolic processing ===> [patterns] (signs & symbols) thus, patterns could involve both mathematics and language, equations and words, and some overlap could occur or exist as it relates to the nature of thinking itself-- such that, while 'binary' views may be easily taken on as a quick route to decision-making, looping probabalistic reasoning via multiple hypotheses autonomic and conscious are the ways the nervous system and brain actually work, in a context of navigating absolute truth and falsity, including constantly refining and add and querying data against contingent models and not simply discarded what is unlike thus 'false'. in this way, an approach to thinking that is ungrounded in experience and natural observation itself can become religious dictate via indoctrinating people into an inaccurate framework and basis for shared awareness and relations that are A=B in terms of pattern recognition, customizing POVs to a warped, skewed pseudotruth that tends to zero, as a compass and guide. The kernel is wrong, faulty, yet cannot be error corrected, power says, government enforces, institutions crushing the facts, observers, denying and censoring and outlawing illegal patterns, universal perspective. Thus there is truth and falsity where A=A and A=/=B reside, and this is the basis for establishing logic. that is, A=A is the pattern match, and A=B is the false match, the errored idea. T/F <--> logic And depending on the 'logic' used for evaluation, that will then influence what is and can be observed, such that: T/F <--> {binary|paradoxical} T/F <--> binary --> 1/0 T/F <--> paradox --> 1/N/0 such that, the logic then influences the observed patterning: T/F <--> logic <--> [patterns] In this situation 'code' could be the patterns that are assumed true and accurate for sake of being operational in a binary framework, whereas with a paradoxical evaluation this truth is not presupposed, instead questioned because it is and always remains contingent- a hypothesis that requires testing, challenging, verification, validation and continual error- correction-- else, via entropy itself, the inherent fallibility of partial observers within limited frameworks would be taken as if truth itself, absolute, even though inaccurate, faulty, by lack of godlike omniscience. logical reasoning is what this testing and error correction are all about yet if it occurs in a binary framework the observational bias continues to see itself as 'correct', infallible observers because they can equate the sign they believe is something with the thing itself apple is the word and not the larger external reference- and thus 'signage' stands in for and begins to mediate truth irrespective of its external validation, within a false empire of signs and symbols-- mathematics and language that becomes and is detached from reality, its own virtual word of anything goes... that is, it may in part connect with truth, yet be assumed 'all true' or absolute, by selective observation based on power dynamics for reasoning, which gets into brute force peer pressure to engineer truth via bullying dynamics, censorship, violence against unshared views, blacklisting, attacks on equipment and tools, etc, to shut down the other observations that error check and correct and *falsify* the believers code, who make their bread on lies and deception, knowingly or not. thus: truth <--> logic <--> [math/lang] <--> [patterns] and in this same way, the observers and perceptual framework could exist in a paradoxical approach, more towards mathesis in terms of higher literacy, whereas the binary is by comparison illiterate to everything outside it limited and controlled framework... truth <--> logic <--> [code] <--> [patterns] And all of this about 'reality' and issues of shared observation and identity, shared and unshared, that allows 'truthful' and false patterns to exist and /represent/ ideas, events, people, accurate or not. mathematics and language are both reliant on logic and truth, and the verification of pattern recognition is in A:A and A:B dynamics, which are evaluated and justified via truth and logic, and a too-simple approach is a basis not only for structural insecurity, it can be a planned exploit of civilization and thus as the "language" or discourse continues in confusing by assuming A=B, many nefarious activities are allowed within that inaccurate context. true evil, and its justification on the normalization of these dynamics and the mediocrity that is allowed and allows for it, as a 'consensus view' that is based in non-truth, only ideologically accurate to a partial view (pT=>0, whereby B>A). that is a context for crypto then, because 'secret communication' and 'hidden writing' can occur both within mathematic and linguistic structure that is in that same context, including an undifferentiated logic, whereby the binary may exist in a bounded realm that the 3-value or N-value could likewise inhabit and move in and through and outside of, via its other dimensionality, yet more accurately account for absolutes (1 and 0) due to a weighted, more accurate evaluative framework for shared empiricism than a rough, coarse, inaccurate all-or-nothing approach that is knowingly false from the start, in that it is unreal, detached from limits of observation and made into a fiction, and thus fictionalizes everything as its result. in other words: [patterns] can be in superposition, yet not in a binary mindset because they can not be evaluated this way, as /ideas/. instead it remains shallow and on the surface of the sign, too simple pattern recognition whereby the belief that A=A is its own confirmation as long as the pattern matches, the image is believed to be what it is, then it is by default correct and true (1), due to the sign itself, not its grounding. truth <--> logic <--> crypto <--> [patterns] Thus if considering ideas in this context, ideas of patterns, ideas of crypto, the models of what are going on _must be accounted for within truth and within an accurate logical evaluation and a binary approach (via logic) is not this-- it is like playing paddy-cake paddy-cake to get the results and seeing the layer cake as an end in itself, its own verification and self-validation, if not narcissism-- i wear the badge, therefore i must be. in other words, as is mentioned many times over a crypto system is not inherently or necessarily a secure system just because it is cryptographic though some may relate to [crypto] as a sign that equates with it without getting into the error checking of ideas, truth of models, and assume or allow models that cannot be tested and thus, limit/exploit scenarios by this approach, where crypto functions against the role of crypto in society and 'the sign' becomes its own antithesis, whereby 'to encrypt' is actually 'to decrypt' in another hidden context-- and that logically, when only partial truth is active, this is probable, beyond 50% likelihood given that several false assumptions may be relied upon that the truth is only minor about what security may exist- say with factoring outside of quantum or other computing architectures, which become dogmatic, faith-based beliefs that everyone knows are bounded observations- thus contingent, unless you have access to the deep underground labs or other galaxies resources. it is the same situation with architecture and anti-architecture or those who look human yet have antihuman agendas (bladerunner-esque), in that the sign of something can be camouflage, a ploy, a substitute or stand-in that is not the thing itself (mimic) and references another unshared grounding (say A-> B) versus what is assumed (A-> A'). so, the signage could be pointing in a given direction, yet going in the opposite, and in this way instead of modeling truth and aligning with it (A=A) it could be subverting and moving away from it (B), yet appear to static or "said to be moving toward it via language and reference to other signs" (A=>A' actually B=>B'). in this way, [crypto] can move towards falsity in a binary framework, yet with paradox this falsity could be multiple, beyond those controlled by the binary approach and its /controlled signage/, beyond the limited threshold and its particular interpretation, thus feasibly invisible, incalculable. this would require reframing thesis-antithesis (and synthesis) in a dueling context of binary and paradoxical logic, which itself would be the compass and basis for a kernel, from my naive view, for the core of the dynamics. another way of saying it: you can have all the code you want, yet if it is not grounded you're fucked. --- conceptualization of hidden interiority -- i found these paintings online that to me indicate a conceptual correlation with visualization of the expanded bit sets in their venn context... # Ordered Chaos 12 & 14 http://www.mnartists.org/work.do?rid=339132 http://www.mnartists.org/work.do?rid=339132&pageIndex=90 # Tao Of Physics, Quantum Space http://www.well.com/~hendrix/TaoOfPhysics.html --- decrypt for feedback --- _ |v JL 3 p\ w Z 7r : 2 6 I N T E R E S T i N G

1 0

Google knows nearly every Wi-Fi password in the world
by Gutem 16 Sep '13

16 Sep '13

http://blogs.computerworld.com/android/22806/google-knows-nearly-every-wi-f… - Gutem

1 0

John Gilmore analyzes NSA disclosures to EFF
by John Young 15 Sep '13

15 Sep '13

John Gilmore assesses NSA disclosures to EFF on encryption, security, operations, more: NSA FISA Business Records Offer a Lot to Learn http://cryptome.org/2013/09/nsa-fisa-business-records.htm

1 0

[3] sampling continued
by brian carroll 15 Sep '13

15 Sep '13

// apologies- yet another attempt at error correction of a previous statement and clarification. quote: Subvert logical reasoning, disallow it, including freedom of speech and thinking and censoring and controlling what facts are allowed - controlling POV - then the opposite occurs: A|B ---> B, such that T => pT This is the code exploit of the Binary Crypto Regime, where B(0)=A and pT(0)>T(1) --- clarification on computational approach --- I made an error in description of processing in the context of infinities, stating one infinity to the next is evaluated as if a serial approach when instead this would be nonlinear and require massively parallel processing, along with serial evaluations in a looping evaluative heuristic - testing against a hypothesis or model, 'running code' or living code' as it were, versus a static one-time interaction of data and algorithms, instead more like a situation of intelligent life in a bounded context as if data aquarium or code planetarium. the reason for this parallelization relates to considering all the combined permutations in terms of probabilities, and thus [x][y][z] as variables are not necessarily, seemingly, about an algorithm that reveals a structure that helps move from x->y->z by some mathematical structure, or so that is my naive guess, such that if you use conventional crypto approach #1 something may be revealed between these that matches an equation pattern, provides order within the chaos of variability, until legible, intelligible.* In other words, instead of XYZ being a serial number that could extend linearly onward toward infinity, that is: [xyz] ...[∞], and that "string" is a horizontal number or code, that can in particular be related perhaps to binary on-off processing in a highly efficient manner, processing and computational speed and largest prime numbers as context-- instead, the assumption for this same situation in another crypto framework is that it could be happening 'vertically' like a slot machine that runs to bounded infinities (largest primes or not), within each variable, and thus [xyz] may not have a discernible linear structure or overall equation that makes sense of the resulting 'horizontal' string. such that: [x][y][z] => [n¹][n²][n³]...[nⁿ] whereby [n] is variable and could be anything- a number, a function, a calculation, null, its own computation. And in this way, each variable could tend towards infinity or its own structuring, within the string, whose length is not so much the issue as the difficulty in resolving its total structure, especially linearly, such that [n¹²³] would not be decipherable running algorithms across its horizontal string and instead solving for each variable or say grouped variables in the string, eg. [n¹][n²⁻³][n⁴⁻⁹] Thus, while i have no actual idea of how crypto and binary code relate in terms of encryption methods and decryption, it is assumed this approach remains serial and directly interrogates the serial string to reveal its structure, across various formats of the code (various programming, encoding and other data formatting schemes). Thus, a binary string would be an example, 10100011001010001010101010010101, whereby to solve for [xyz...n] would involve finding the overall linear structure that provides for such linear organization, say assuming it is encrypted code *)S)*S*))SA&*S&**S()S*S)aAUIHNL*0, and therefore the assumption would remain that each variable is related to the next in some 'coherence' and solving one part or layer may reveal another, such as HSKSLLILHSILALSWLWLSDUI and thus the string [xyz] is made intelligible by this coherence within the linear string, across that massive horizontality (very large streams of data that contain data and programs and messaging). Whereas for a paradoxical logic approach, each variable could itself be 'many' in place of a single bit- or the boundary of the single bit could be [N] and move towards a bounded infinity, a mathematical function, or other calculation in that same location. disclaimer, stating the obvious, i have no idea what this is in terms of applied cryptography, there is tremendous gap between these statements and actual code, though to me the approach is much more accurate as "thinking code" that involves human processing via logical reasoning, parallel and serial processing, and thus the very idea of a string of code in that view could also function as signal in noise or even absolute truth, in terms of messaging. and so it is obvious 'binary thinking' is not like everyday evaluation in the sense that there is grey-area to mediating events, a pause to decision- yet within this pause, bounded infinities of hypotheses can be queried (referencing previous instances in stored or external memories) that then influence the tallying of the response, which most likely will be weighted between 1 and 0, unless purely ideological. Thus- *conceptually*- to consider "code" in this human context, of a living breathing idea that is grounded in empirical truth in a shared human viewpoint, that is to be shared as information, via exchange, it is more grayscale than 10110101010100001, in terms of language and how thinking functions, more about looping and weighting of variables than having a *single correct result* when there can be several overlapping or contrasting interpretations *at the same time*. So imagine if the binary string had each bit that was variable instead in a 0-9 scale of weighting the evaluation, such that 10927238292340246. This moves the [binary] string into a fragmented string of variables, more like analog computation [1][0][9]...[6]. In this way it is to consider the 'bit' as N-variable, and thus what if it were the alphabet instead of numbers: 26 letters possible for each bit: USOWHLSELNSQAHBVY the issue being that like a slot machine, those [N] variable bits could tally up any potential letter of 26, or +10 numbers with alphanumerics, or add lower case and punctuation or symbols and suddenly a small 'string' of data could involve huge interrelational structures that may or may not be related across the horizontal span, depending on how it is constructed via algorithms and conceptual formatting. Maybe this already is the way transformed code is achieved with taking a certain sized content- variable [x], and then transmuting its entirety into a string or stream of obfuscated data that must be 'worked at' to decrypt or be translated to make use of. The seeming difference would be computationally, how this relation exists in processing, in terms of hardware and software, though also thinking, programming. Because what if there is a limit to these transmutations that is forced into a binary 1/0 and thus bounds these infinities to only certain algorithmic space, or even computationally, that such numbers cannot be adequately computed and thus *do not exist* as calculations within machines and software approaches, crypto perhaps especially, when the security they would provide would be unfathomable in terms of existing brute force calculations of 'linear' patterns. my speculation is of an unknowing of applied cryptography and computer programming yet knowing of logical reasoning and empirical thinking, awareness, and how the two are ideologically at odds in approach in terms of basic assumptions. thus within my condition of 'illiteracy' there is an attempt to share an idea (pT) about a shared situation from an outsider vantage, with those of highest literacy of applied code, yet within what to my observation is a flawed idea and based on false and inaccurate assumptions, in particular the primacy of binarism for security when this nonlinear/multilinear computation (parallel & serial) would easily defeat it. such that it is not about strings and instead parallel sets: [x|x|x|x]...[n] as the [variable] yet this may not be coherent in a horizontal algorithm to solve, it may not have 'rationality' across, from one digit to the next, revealing its hidden structure. instead, randomness would be inherent instead of woven into the code, it would be more revealing information out of noise structures than putting information into noise that is bounded and can be shaped into structure. in this way also, noise could have structure yet not lead to decryption, it may be a false corridor within the ever expanding maze. it is that [N] variables each are in superposition, not static by default, finite and absolute, and instead 'truly variable', unbounded to a certain extent (infinities within infinities across infinities via nested sets). the conceit or test of the heresy would be 256 'bit' quantum computer that solves 256 AES, though if it were a binary string this could even be trivial, versus say [N]-bit, which seemingly could take *forever* to evaluate, via running, looping code evaluation and a shared empirical model that develops alongside, out of and through the technology as a 'thinking machine'-- which, the more it is like the human brain, the more likely the messaging could be made sensible via existing concepts and structures to test against, evaluating patterns and looking for correlations. in that context, a three bit [N]-variable string of code could probably defeat all computing power today, especially if large expanses were allowed, numbers, letters, symbols-- it would be unsolvable potentially, extremely probable. Largest primes would be a minor detail, another variable seemingly in such a context, due to its potential for incoherence and complexity. likewise, this [N]-bit approach for random number generators, yet why not random outside of 1/0 as a noise field, generating strings via a two [N]-variable string, just let it run and tap that, without or without structure, would it even matter. in other words: take any two ideas, any two signs or symbols or colors or whatever, and relate them and tally and extend this as a process. that is proto-language in a nutshell, this the crazy nut cracked open yet beyond the insanity of my own incapacity to communicate and flaws in understanding-- there is something about this approach and basically observation that has *coherence* that is absent in a binary approach and serial algorithms-- because that is not how people think or communicate, it is N-dimensional, geometrical, looping. and processors and code and software at present cannot model this, allow for it. and that formats reasoning, perception, what options are available to share ideas and evaluate them, and we are stuck in binary because it is enshrined both in technology though also in institutions-- it is the dead static code of shared ideological non-thinking that is pushing decision-making and actions towards its deterministic end game, which is a onesided machine-based value system, devoid of life, nature, and humanity, except insofar as it profits its own continuing automated development and further extension. so the gap between my illiterate views and the actuality of implemented security code by those literate is one aspect, though another is my literacy in thinking code and the illiteracy of thinking within foundational technology, its infrastructure, and the result of this, which requires a world like it is, and relies on bad code and ideas to allow for it. thus an audit or accounting of the situation, an attempt to get across the idea that there is a model of dumb, unintelligent code at the base of this situation, the approach is so flawed as to be the basis for tyranny, and it ties into 'ideology' across platforms, individuals and groups of people to software/hardware and bureaucratic systems, and in that 'combined state' of a false-perspective empire, the kernel is corrupt and the whole thing invalid, including at the constitutional level which itself is ignored, by binary default, the epic loophole of relativistic frameworks allowing the fiction and its virtuality to replace shared logical reasoning, because truth and logic can simply be ignored, 'privatized'. and enclaves can rule over others as if a caste-system via technology and ideological assumptions that function as religion, technologists as priests, gods of this technocratic utopia, the peasants not having the understanding to operate in such a realm, as guaranteed by the originating lie and tradeoff that allows for all of this to continue. that absolute truth is an everyday condition and you get to choose what to believe as if a right or protected mode of operation, no matter how many others must suffer for it, to sustain the illusion and shared delusion. the cloud here in the corrupted model a state filing cabinet, digital bureau for the bureaucracy, citizens organizing info into others invisible folder structures, volunteering the data via handover, designed into the technology itself as a marketing and communications strategy. the sieve of private data is equivalent to entire populations seeking out pickpockets to hand over their contents, incentivized as it is. and so 'security' is as if a kind of institutional transparency in relation to a corrupted, failed, rogue state that can read and see everything you are doing, whether or not encrypted, dumb terminals every computer to the state mainframe, rebranded and rebadged, hidden, 'anonymous'. --- more of this insane ungrounded viewpoint -- it was mentioned a three variable 'string' [x|y|z] would be differently approached if parallel versus serial, in that each bit of a binary string could be N-variable in a parallel approach, or so it is assumed possible, as with probabilities and slot machines, or basic everyday observation of events and what enters and exits consciousness given context. and while not knowing the depth of this in terms of cryptography, completely out of my depth, it would seem the concept of keyspace could relate to how such a 'paradoxical string' could exist, given the boundary for determining what N could be for [x], [y], [z]. For instance if it were binary ones and zeroes, the probabilities could be run and 8 different permutations or combinations: 111, 100, 110, 101, 010, 011, 001, 000. And within that, perhaps there is meaning. Yet if 'the probabilities' are changed via [N]-bit variables, it could go all the way to infinity for a single variable, and thus BIG BANG inflate via probabilities into a huge keyspace, perhaps unpacking structures this way that reference others already developed, as if infrastructure being revealed that connects with others elsewhere, via wormhole-like connectivity and then closing down upon successful messaging, thus encrypting and decrypting via few variables, via inherent yet hidden structural relations within these combinations, which could be infinities related to infinities and then the issue of how to find them or what to look for. Black box yet even moreso, RNG as model for signal, not noise, thus tending toward psychic Random Event Generator as if innate sense of animals before catastrophe, cosmic faults and folds. the idea or difference is paradox- essentially *superposition* of the bit as [N]-variable, no longer finite and static, potentially active and transformative, diagnostic even in a sensor sense of the analogue as queued circuit. What if alignment occurs in the string under certain conditions and not others, what if it tunes in and structures revealed, decrypt, yet out of tune it vanishes, code collapse or changes as with temperature sensing colors, and the variables change, mask into background, returning to mystery. It does not seem that computers today can even adequately allow for infinity, a single bit of this, versus a larger parallel string- and what might that mean about thinking, too. nothing more than finite discreet thoughts, one decision to the next unconnected, unless largest prime, say rogue US terror-state pwns earth as if master discourse, shared POV, even though ungrounded- this the dumbed down unintelligent lowliest shared viewpoint of situations in their depth, instead made shallow, sold as daily headline? the CODE makes it so, in brains and machinery and bureaucracy. binary is the enforced and corrupted 'shared state', conceptually and ideologically, yet it is a false belief. the issue then of shared and unshared identity, belonging or not belonging to this 'master/slave' thinking... shared ID <-----> unshared ID And how this relates to default interpretations, the quickest route for 'feedback' and determining events based on perspective... are you binary or paradoxical? Can you make sense of your own consciousness or must you take on false consciousness to function in society and go about decision-making in its frameworks, taking on its value systems yet which fragment a person from their own 'true' self, taking over and reformatting and reprogramming a life to serve the machine agenda over and against 'shared humanity' -- now an unshared identity, via private relativistic ideology. sell out your ancestors and neighbors for a place in the machine... Quickest route to thinking- *binary* of course, processor speed as if SUPERSMART! --- "look- i can decide things and determine things irrespective of their actual truth, and it works for me and others, everyone else is just lazy!" Like water flowing downhill, 'logical reasoning' turned into Price is Right PLINKO game, quick and easy 'automated reasoning' via path of least resistance aided and abetted by binary ideology, creating friction-free virtual universe, mind detached from body by also flawed historical beliefs, enabling this madness its onesided platform. the trope of largest prime 'uncorrected ideological perspective' the trophy award for the most stupid, greedy, and ignorant. an entire society and civilization built around rewarding those whose activities align with this, against human conscience and its needs, that then is viewed as the enemy. --- major social dynamic --- ideologically there is a differentiation in terms of the process of reasoning, how information is parsed... intelligent <-----> smart also, how shared identity may differ between empirical and relativistic models of truth... truth <-----> partial truth and the difference in conceptualization, reliance on how frameworks are constructed, tested... ideas <-----> facts and this directly relates to issues of observation and cybernetics (looping circuitry)... fallible observer <-----> infallible observer error-correction <-----> no error correction In this way 'inflated' or 'bubble' views can rely on warping, skew, distortion for their truth which is verified by conforming to a false or inaccurate model reliant on a limited *protected* or SECURED version of pseudo-truth (pT), as if shared empirical reality (T) removed of error, because it is believed to be, via ideology. grounded empiricism <-----> ungrounded relativism In this way a 'private worldview' can replace 'the public' view as if a shared domain, and become the basis for one-sided 'reasoning' depending on authoritative beliefs, where facts can be chosen to fit the model, others discarded, to uphold the perimeter, basically privatizing perspective to a finite inaccurate view as the exploit. reality (1) <-----> false-perspective (0) humanity <-----> the state (?) There is always the possibility that this was planned in advance as a cosmic setup from the beginning, and therefore the state could be doubled, paradoxical, existing both in the shared truth of humans and in the lies of the false viewpoint... humanity <-----> state (T|F) In this way the two state solution could be moving those 'false' on the side of humanity over to the false state, and the true state over to side with humanity, via reversal of dynamics, trapping the exploiters within their own rigged game... human state (1) <-----> rogue state (0) And thus doubled or backdoor crypto could be vital to this process, itself constituting the trap while transcending this context of surveillance and putting it to use for human goals and values, working-through this hell into the birth of new cosmic civilization, of shared identity, as this relates to eco|soc|pol-issues, shared set evaluations for money and taxes and policy and direction slash governance, versus the corrupt code and its circuits etched into the world and minds today as pain, suffering, terror, horror, insanity. // * the following repeated text in case superscript numbers do not translate, for reference: In other words, instead of XYZ being a serial number that could extend linearly onward toward infinity, that is: [xyz] ...[infinity], and that "string" is a horizontal number or code, that can in particular be related perhaps to binary on-off processing in a highly efficient manner, processing and computational speed and largest prime numbers as context-- instead, the assumption for this same situation in another crypto framework is that it could be happening 'vertically' like a slot machine that runs to bounded infinities (largest primes or not), within each variable, and thus [xyz] may not have a discernible linear structure or overall equation that makes sense of the resulting 'horizontal' string. such that: [x][y][z] => [n^1][n^2][n^3]...[n^n] whereby [n] is variable and could be anything- a number, a function, a calculation, null, its own computation. And in this way, each variable could tend towards infinity or its own structuring, within the string, whose length is not so much the issue as the difficulty in resolving its total structure, especially linearly, such that [n^123] would not be decipherable running algorithms across its horizontal string and instead solving for each variable or say grouped variables in the string, eg. [n^1][n^2-3][n^4-9] ⚔

2 2