cypherpunks
Threads by month
- ----- 2024 -----
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
January 2024
- 12 participants
- 461 discussions
Advisory board goal for Post Office scandal victims to be returned to rightful financial position
by Gunnar Larson 22 Aug '24
by Gunnar Larson 22 Aug '24
22 Aug '24
https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252529287/Advisory-board-goal-for-Post-…
The board set up to monitor the compensation scheme for Post Office scandal
victims agrees goal of returning them to the financial position they would
be in had the scandal never happened
Karl Flinders, Chief reporter and senior editor EMEA
Published: 18 Jan 2023 12:15
The advisory board set up to oversee compensation awards to 555 victims of
the Post Office Horizon scandal has agreed a goal of returning them to the
financial position they would have been in had the scandal not happened.
Thousands of former subpostmasters were blamed for accounting shortfalls
caused by errors in the Post Office accounting software. They were forced
to repay huge sums, and were often bankrupted as a result. Many were
prosecuted and sent to prison.
The scandal destroyed the lives and livelihoods of the former
subpostmasters and their families for decades, with many suffering
stress-related illness. Suicides have been linked with the scandal.
In its first meeting, the GLO Compensation Scheme Advisory Board met
representatives of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial
Strategy (BEIS).
The board agreed: “As with the general law, the goal should be to restore
the claimants to the position that they would have been in if the scandal
had not happened.”
The 555 former subpostmasters and Post Office branch workers were part of a
Group Litigation Order (GLO), which in 2019 proved that the software used
by Post Office branches, known as Horizon, was causing the unexplained
shortfalls they were blamed for.
They proved the software, from Fujitsu, was to blame, and forced the Post
Office to admit this was the case after nearly 20 years of denying it.
The Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance
The victory for the 555 subpostmasters in the High Court, all part of the
Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance (JFSA), were awarded £58m in damages,
but after their legal costs – provided by a litigation funder that requires
repayment with interest – were taken out, they were left with just £11m to
share. This left people that had lost homes, businesses and huge sums of
money with an average of a few thousand pounds each.
The judgements in the High Court case, which was paid for by the victims,
also triggered the unravelling of one of the biggest miscarriages of
justice in British history. So far, more than 80 former subpostmasters have
had wrongful convictions for theft and fraud overturned.
The court ruling also forced the Post Office to set up a compensation
scheme for any subpostmaster affected by the Horizon errors.
But the Post Office and its government backer did not allow any of the 555
that took part in the court action to apply, citing that the compensation
that was already paid was “full and final”.
Alan Bates, the former subpostmaster who set up the JFSA in 2009 and has
chaired it since, wrote to the government after the court victory,
demanding it paid the legal costs to leave JFSA members with fairer
compensation, but the government refused.
But Bates and JFSA members kept pushing the government for justice, and
through generating public pressure and instigating a judicial review forced
the government to set up a statutory public inquiry into the Horizon
scandal, which is ongoing.
Although compensation was initially left out of the terms of reference of
the public inquiry, the JFSA and its supporters forced the government to
include an examination of compensation.
Fair compensation
The JFSA kept fighting for fair compensation, just as they had fought for
justice for over a decade, and in June, the government was forced to agree
to pay it.
The GLO Compensation Scheme Advisory Board, set up to oversee the JFSA
compensation scheme, is made up of University of Oxford professor
Christopher Hodges, who is chair, peer James Arbuthnot and MP Kevan Jones,
who have supported and campaigned for justice for victims of the Horizon
scandal for two decades.
Arbuthnot said he was encouraged by the first meeting of the board with
BIES representatives. “Two key principles – the need for the goal to be to
restore the claimants to the position that they would have been in if the
scandal had not happened, and the imperative of speed of compensation –
were agreed,” he said. “Now we need to ensure that both are carried out.”
Jones said: “Good progress was made during the first meeting of the GLO
Compensation Scheme Advisory Board, including the parameters of the scheme.
The next meeting will be in February, where we will discuss setting up the
scheme as soon as possible.”
JFSA chair Bates said: “An oversight board was something very much missing
in previous schemes and it offers reassurance to the scheme that people
that have been so supportive over the years are involved. It also provides
some transparency.”
In 2009, Computer Weekly told the stories of seven subpostmasters affected
by the problems (see timeline of Computer Weekly articles below).
Read all Computer Weekly articles about the scandal since 2009
May 2009: Bankruptcy, prosecution and disrupted livelihoods – postmasters
tell their story.
September 2009: Postmasters form action group after accounts shortfall.
November 2009: Post Office theft case deferred over IT questions.
May 2010: A pilot of the new Horizon Online system at Royal Mail has been
scaled back after connectivity problems and outages.
February 2011: Post Office faces legal action over alleged accounting
system failures.
October 2011: 85 subpostmasters seek legal support in claims against Post
Office computer system.
June 2012: Post Office launches external review of system at centre of
legal disputes.
January 2013: Post Office admits Horizon system needs more investigation.
January 2013: Post Office announces amnesty for Horizon evidence.
January 2013: Post Office wants to get to bottom of IT system allegations.
June 2013: Investigation into Post Office accounting system to drill down
on strongest cases.
July 2013: Post Office Horizon system investigation reveals concerns.
October 2013: End in sight for subpostmaster claims against Post Office’s
Horizon accounting system.
October 2013: Former Lord Justice of Appeal Hooper joins Post Office
Horizon investigation.
November 2013: 150 subpostmasters file claims over “faulty” Horizon
accounting system.
September 2014: Fresh questions raised over Post Office IT system’s role in
fraud cases.
December 2014: MPs blast Post Office over IT system investigation and
remove backing.
December 2014: Why MPs lost faith in the Post Office’s IT investigation,
but vowed to fight on.
December 2014: MPs to debate subpostmaster IT injustice claims.
December 2014: MP accuses Post Office of acting ‘duplicitously’ in IT
investigation.
January 2015: MPs force inquiry into Post Office subpostmaster mediation
scheme.
January 2015: Post Office faces grilling by MPs over Horizon accounting
system.
February 2015: Post Office CIO will talk to any subpostmaster about IT
problems, promises CEO.
March 2015: Post Office ends working group for IT system investigation day
before potentially damaging report.
March 2015: MPs seek reassurance over Post Office mediation scheme.
March 2015: Retiring MP aims to uncover truth of alleged Post Office
computer system problems.
April 2015: Post Office failed to investigate account shortfalls before
legal action, report claims.
April 2015: Criminal Courts Review Commission set to review subpostmasters’
claims of wrongful prosecution.
June 2015: Post Office looking to replace controversial Horizon system with
IBM, says MP.
July 2015: Campaigners call for independent inquiry into Post Office
Horizon IT system dispute.
October 2015: James Arbuthnot takes Post Office IT fight to House of Lords.
November 2015: The union that represents Post Office subpostmasters has
warned of a problem with the Horizon accounting system.
November 2015: An email from Post Office IT support reveals a problem with
the Horizon system and supporting processes that could lead to accounting
errors.
November 2015: Group litigation against Post Office being prepared in
Horizon dispute.
February 2016: Post Office faces group litigation over Horizon IT as
subpostmasters fund class action.
June 2016: Post Office chairman Tim Parker says there would be
“considerable risk” associated with changing its Horizon computer system.
November 2016: The legal team hired by a group of subpostmasters will take
their case to the next stage.
January 2017: The group action against the Post Office that alleges
subpostmasters have been wrongly punished for accounting errors gets green
light from the High Court of Justice.
March 2017: 1,000 subpostmasters apply to join IT-related group litigation
against Post Office.
April 2017: Investigation into claims of miscarriages of justice in
relation to a Post Office accounting system has appointed a forensic
accountant firm.
May 2017: Hundreds of subpostmasters have applied to join IT-related legal
action since March.
July 2017: Post Office defence in computer system legal case due this week.
August 2017: Campaigners submit initial evidence in group litigation
against Post Office over controversial Horizon IT system.
October 2017: Subpostmasters’ group action against the Post Office reaches
an important milestone.
November 2017: An end is in sight for subpostmasters’ campaign against
alleged wrongful prosecution, which they blame on a faulty computer system.
November 2017: The High Court judge managing the subpostmasters versus Post
Office legal case over an allegedly faulty computer system tells legal
teams to cooperate.
January 2018: Forensic investigation into Post Office IT system at centre
of legal case nears completion.
April 2018: Criminal Cases Review Commission forensic examination of the IT
system at the centre of a legal case against the Post Office has raised
further questions.
May 2018: Post Office branches unable to connect to Horizon computer system
for several hours after morning opening time.
October 2018: After over a decade of controversy, next week marks the
beginning of a court battle between subpostmasters and the Post Office.
November 2018: Case against Post Office in relation to allegedly faulty
computer system begins in High Court.
November 2018: High Court case in which subpostmasters are suing the Post
Office has revealed a known problem with a computer system at the core of
the dispute.
November 2018: A High Court trial, where subpostmasters are suing the Post
Office for damages caused by an allegedly faulty IT system, ends second
week.
November 2018: Post Office director admits to Horizon errors and not
sharing details with subpostmaster network.
November 2018: The High Court trial in which subpostmasters are suing the
Post Office has reached an important stage.
December 2018: CCRC may hold off subpostmaster decision until after Post
Office Horizon trial.
December 2018: Court case where subpostmasters are suing the Post Office
set to span at least four trials and extend into 2020.
January 2019: Subpostmasters’ campaign group attacks Post Office CEO Paula
Vennells’ New Year honour amid ongoing court case.
January 2019: Thousands of known errors on controversial Post Office
computer system to be revealed.
March 2019: Tech under spotlight at High Court in second subpostmasters
versus Post Office trial.
March 2019: Post Office considered Horizon IT system “high-risk”, court
told.
March 2019: CCRC watching Post Office Horizon trial closely.
March 2019: Judge rules that Post Office showed “oppressive behaviour” in
response to claimants accused of accounting errors they blamed on Horizon
IT system.
March 2019: Post Office “lacked humanity” in the treatment of
subpostmasters, says peer.
March 2019: A High Court judge heard that the Post Office did not
investigate a computer system error that could cause losses, despite being
offered evidence.
March 2019: The Post Office legal team in the case brought by more than 500
subpostmasters has called for the judge to be recused after questioning his
impartiality.
March 2019: A senior civil servant asked the Post Office to repay public
money it had wrongly allocated to paying legal costs.
April 2019: Subpostmaster claimants’ legal team makes application for the
Post Office to pay millions of pounds of costs associated with trial.
April 2019: Post Office to appeal judgment from first Horizon trial.
April 2019: The Post Office’s claim that the judge overseeing the case
concerning its controversial Horizon IT system was biased has been
dismissed.
April 2019: MP questions government over Post Office Horizon case.
April 2019: Government says no conflict of interest in trial despite Post
Office chairman’s dual role.
May 2019: The Court of Appeal has refused the Post Office’s application to
appeal a major decision in the Horizon IT trial.
May 2019: The Post Office has applied for permission to appeal judgments
from the first trial in its IT-related legal battle with subpostmasters.
May 2019: The judge in the Post Office Horizon trial has ordered the
organisation to pay the legal costs of its courtroom adversaries, and
refused to give permission to appeal a major judgment.
June 2019: Post Office asks Court of Appeal for permission to appeal
judgment in first Horizon trial.
July 2019: The Post Office has admitted that some subpostmasters are at
risk of accounts not balancing due to an error it does not understand.
July 2019: Problem revealed during High Court trial left subpostmaster with
£18,000 surplus after IT system failed to register full amount of cash
scanned in.
August 2019: Subpostmasters suffering slow running and frozen terminals
while Post Office searches for a fix to issues apparently caused by a
software update.
August 2019: The Post Office has fixed the latest problems with its Horizon
system, affecting hundreds of branches.
October 2019: A High Court judgment for a trial that focused on the Post
Office’s IT system at the centre of a multimillion-pound litigation will be
announced early next month.
November 2019: The Court of Appeal has rejected a Post Office application
to appeal judgments made in its multimillion-pound battle with
subpostmasters over IT system failures.
November 2019: Peer calls for clear-out of Post Office board after Court of
Appeal confirms major court defeat.
December 2019: The Post Office has settled its long-running legal dispute
with subpostmasters, and will pay £57.75m in damages.
December 2019: Subpostmansters ended their legal battle with the Post
Office at the optimal time, according to the lawyer that managed the High
Court action.
December 2019: Subpostmansters proved right on IT system failures as calls
for full public inquiry mount.
December 2019: Criminal Courts Review Commission to review Horizon judgment
“swiftly”.
December 2019: National Federation of Subpostmasters cries foul after court
ruling on controversial computer system.
December 2019: Former Post Office CEO apologises to subpostmasters over
Horizon scandal.
December 2019: Call for former Post Office CEO to step down from public
roles after IT court battle lost.
January 2020: Fujitsu must face scrutiny following Post Office Horizon
trial judgment.
January 2020: Subpostmaster group calls for government to pay legal costs
for Horizon trial.
January 2020: Why subpostmasters are calling on the government to pay
Horizon trial costs.
January 2020: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy says it
did not make decisions in the Post Office’s recent court battle.
January 2020: Government should not be allowed to dismiss subpostmasters’
claims over Horizon IT scandal.
January 2020: Police sent information about potential Fujitsu staff perjury
in subpostmaster prosecutions.
January 2020: Prosecutions are a significant step closer to being sent to
the Court of Appeal as Criminal Courts Review Commission forms a group of
commissioners to review them.
January 2020: Alan Bates: The “details man” the Post Office paid the price
for ignoring.
February 2020: The government has refused to pay the huge legal costs
subpostmasters incurred in their battle with the government-owned Post
Office, which they won.
February 2020: Members of Parliament seeking a public inquiry into the Post
Office Horizon scandal face huge challenges, but pressure and time could
force justice.
February 2020: Calls for inquiry into Post Office IT scandal increase in
Parliament, with cross-party support.
February 2020: Care Quality Commission to review concerns over Paula
Vennells’ appointment after they were raised by a former NHS consultant
psychiatrist.
February 2020: Government admits it was too passive managing Post Office as
parliamentary pressure builds.
February 2020: Minister says Post Office IT experts misled the government
when it asked questions about subpostmasters’ concerns over Horizon IT
system.
March 2020: Boris Johnson commits to “getting to the bottom of” Post Office
Horizon IT scandal.
March 2020: Boris Johnson’s commitment to inquiry into Post Office scandal
in doubt.
March 2020: MPs call on PM to commit to full public inquiry into Post
Office Horizon IT scandal.
March 2020: Those who did not play by the rules in Post Office Horizon
scandal “should face prosecution”.
March 2020: MPs told to hold to account those responsible for Post Office
Horizon IT scandal.
March 2020: The Post Office has sparked anger with secret settlements with
subpostmasters outside the recent legal action against it.
March 2020: Labour MP Karl Turner tells Computer Weekly that the Post
Office Horizon scandal is the most grotesque version of predatory
capitalism he has ever seen.
March 2020: MP Kevan Jones has warned a government minister not to repeat
the mistakes of predecessors in relation to the Post Office Horizon IT
scandal.
March 2020: Criminal Cases Review Commission to use Microsoft Teams to
ensure review of subpostmaster prosecutions is held on time.
March 2020: Post Office postpones subpostmaster compensation scheme amid
Covid-19 crisis.
March 2020: Meeting reviewing subpostmaster applications to appeal criminal
prosecutions moves into second day.
March 2020: Subpostmaster prosecutions to be considered by Court of Appeal
for miscarriages of justice.
March 2020: How subpostmasters made legal history with biggest referral of
potential miscarriages of justice.
April 2020: Met Police examines information about evidence given in court
by Fujitsu staff on the Horizon IT system.
May 2020: Subpostmasters who had their lives ruined by the Post Office’s
faulty IT system have received their damages after a High Court victory.
May 2020: A senior Post Office executive at the centre of an IT scandal,
who tried to mislead a High Court judge in relation to it, has left the
organisation without fanfare despite many years of service.
May 2020: Post Office re-examines hundreds of prosecutions that could have
resulted from faults in Horizon IT system.
June 2020: A campaign group representing subpostmasters wrongly prosecuted
for theft and false accounting by the Post Office is raising money to help
clear the names of victims of the scandal.
June 2020: Subpostmasters to force scrutiny of government’s role in Post
Office IT scandal.
June 2020: The Criminal Cases Review Commission sends 47 more subpostmaster
cases to Court of Appeal and asks government to review private prosecution
powers.
June 2020: Select committee chair writes to former Post Office CEO
demanding answers over her role in IT scandal.
June 2020: The government has been accused of launching a review that fails
in getting to the bottom of one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in
UK history.
June 2020: Subpostmasters will not cooperate with government review into IT
scandal.
June 2020: The government’s proposed review of the Post Office IT scandal
has received a further setback as forensic accountants join subpostmasters
in refusing to back it.
June 2020: Call for government review of Post Office Horizon scandal to
have the power to force individuals to give evidence under oath.
June 2020: Subpostmasters seeking justice in the Post Office Horizon IT
scandal are regaining momentum in Parliament.
June 2020: Healthcare regulator will be discussing concerns about former
NHS boss chairing an NHS trust at an upcoming meeting.
June 2020: Second Sight is working with law firm in appeals by
subpostmasters against criminal convictions in Horizon IT scandal.
June 2020: Post Office and Fujitsu blame each other for many of the
failings in the Horizon IT scandal that wrecked lives.
June 2020: Parliamentary Justice Committee to hold short inquiry into the
rules and regulations surrounding private organisations’ ability to
initiate criminal proceedings.
July 2020: Victims of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal need to raise
thousands of pounds in a week or those responsible for their suffering will
avoid scrutiny.
July 2020: The government is set to face scrutiny over its involvement in
the Post Office Horizon IT scandal, described as one of the biggest
miscarriages of justice in modern UK history.
September 2020: The government repeats that it won’t pay victims’ legal
costs and confirms review into the scandal will not have the power to call
witnesses.
September 2020: Subpostmasters still not being told about all the known
errors in the controversial Post Office branch accounting and retail system
that they use.
October 2020: The Post Office has chosen not to contest 44 out of 47
appeals, meaning most are likely to have their names cleared, but others
still face a Court of Appeal battle for justice.
October 2020: MPs are demanding the government holds a full statutory
public inquiry into the Post Office IT scandal.
October 2020: NHS regulator continues enquiries about the appointment of
former Post Office CEO at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust as more
damning details emerge.
October 2020: Government minister met with former subpostmaster online in
an attempt to get victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal involved in
government review.
October 2020: The Post Office is focusing urgently on fixing an IT error
suffered by a subpostmaster amid the ongoing IT scandal.
October 2020: Labour politicians are calling for the government to give the
Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry the power to force witnesses to give
evidence if they don’t cooperate.
October 2020: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust has asked for external
review of its process when appointing controversial executive.
November 2020: Government faces scrutiny of its handling of the Post Office
IT scandal that destroyed subpostmasters’ lives and livelihoods.
November 2020: Post Office branches offline during busy business hours
after suffering an IT error that the Post Office said related to IT from
supplier Fujitsu.
November 2020: Fujitsu is refusing to explain what caused a national system
outage in Post Office branches last week, despite the Post Office
confirming the issue was the fault of the supplier.
November 2020: The Metropolitan Police opens criminal investigation into
Fujitsu staff who gave evidence in trials of subpostmasters wrongly
prosecuted and even imprisoned for financial crimes.
November 2020: Post Office criticised over vagueness of its explanation of
the cause of a UK-wide IT failure that saw subpostmasters unable to do
business.
November 2020: Post Office says planned firmware update caused the problem
that left branches unable to do business for 90 minutes.
November 2020: Court documents reveal the names of the Fujitsu employees
under investigation for potentially providing misleading information in
criminal trials.
November 2020: The government allowed the Post Office to ‘run amok’ and
destroy lives, says complaint to Parliamentary Ombudsman.
November 2020: Campaigning politician demands access to documents that
could prove that the Post Office lied.
December 2020: Government denies responsibility for the abuse inflicted on
subpostmasters by the Post Office over faulty IT system.
December 2020: CEO at the centre of the scandal that saw innocent people
bankrupted and some sent to prison steps down from NHS role as pressure for
her resignation grows.
December 2020: History made as subpostmasters wrongly prosecuted in Horizon
IT scandal have convictions quashed.
December 2020: The appointment of a former Post Office executive, who tried
to mislead a judge, in the Football Association of Wales has been
questioned by an MP.
December 2020: Court of Appeal indicates subpostmasters can pursue appeal
route that could do more damage to Post Office’s reputation.
January 2021: NHS trust defends its director appointment process following
an external review of its recruitment of former Post Office CEO Paula
Vennells.
January 2021: Lawyers call for changes to digital evidence rule that made
it easier for the Post Office to ‘bamboozle courts’ and make subpostmasters
pay a heavy price for its IT failings.
January 2021: The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has referred four
more subpostmasters’ criminal convictions to appeal, as part of the biggest
miscarriage of justice in modern UK history.
February 2021: A former senior developer who worked for Fujitsu on the Post
Office IT system that led to subpostmasters being falsely accused of fraud,
has claimed bosses knew of fundamental flaws before going live.
February 2021: Subpostmasters call for Boris Johnson to pause and reshape
the government’s Horizon inquiry.
February 2021: Vote of no confidence in Football Association of Wales boss
triggered by recruitment of former Post Office executive who tried to
mislead a judge in IT trial.
March 2021: Government agrees to change private prosecution rules that were
abused by the Post Office in its pursuit of subpostmasters wrongly accused
of financial crimes.
March 2021: Subpostmaster victims who have spent millions bringing the Post
Office IT scandal to light have received no reply to their concerns from
Boris Johnson.
March 2021: MP condemns department’s ‘bizarre’ rejection of freedom of
information request linked to Post Office IT scandal.
March 2021: Football Association Wales boss steps down after losing
confidence motion triggered by appointment of an executive involved in the
Post Office IT scandal.
March 2021: The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) is
reviewing five cases of potential miscarriage of justice in relation to
subpostmaster prosecutions.
March 2021: Subpostmasters heading to Court of Appeal to clear their names
in what is potentially the biggest miscarriage of justice in English legal
history.
March 2021: The Post Office does not have enough money to pay compensation
to the subpostmasters it wrongfully prosecuted.
March 2021: Angela van den Bogerd has left her role at the Football
Association of Wales, following criticism of her part in Post Office IT
scandal.
March 2021: Court of Appeal hearing reveals Post Office instructed
employees to destroy documents that undermined an insistence that its
Horizon computer system was robust.
March 2021: The Post Office was warned that a former Fujitsu employee had
misled courts when giving evidence on its behalf.
March 2021: Boris Johnson agrees with MP that those responsible for the
Post Office Horizon scandal should be brought to book.
March 2021: Former Post Office chief was paid over £400,000 when she left
despite the organisation being involved in what would become the biggest
miscarriage of justice in UK history.
April 2021: The UK government faces a potential judicial review over its
Post Office Horizon IT scandal inquiry, after subpostmasters formally wrote
to the government seeking one.
April 2021: The government is listening to calls for changes in how digital
evidence is considered in court, as Post Office IT scandal spells out
current rule’s inadequacy.
April 2021: The Post Office's controversial contract with Fujitsu has been
extended another year to help the organisation manage its exit.
April 2021: The Post Office is to move work done by Fujitsu in-house when
its outsourcing contract ends, and is already recruiting IT experts.
April 2021: The Post Office has revealed the end to its controversial
Horizon IT system which, through its errors and the Post Office's denial of
them, caused huge suffering.
April 2021: The UK government is the only block to fair compensation for
subpostmasters who were wrongly punished for accounting shortfalls.
April 2021: The Court of Appeal has overturned the criminal convictions of
39 subpostmasters who were blamed and punished for accounting shortfalls
caused by computer errors.
April 2021: Former Post Office CEO Paula Vennells has left roles in the
church, Morrisons and Dunelm after postmasters’ convictions were overturned
in the Court of Appeal.
April 2021: The biggest miscarriage of justice in UK history is set to get
bigger as more subpostmasters take their cases to the Court of Appeal.
May 2021: Post Office IT scandal CEO has no excuse for her inaction in
preventing the biggest miscarriage of justice in UK history, says Criminal
Cases Review Commission chairperson.
May 2021: Subpostmasters, MPs and the public call for a full statutory
judge-led public inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal, following
another damning court judgment.
May 2021: Government says it wants to ensure a fair pay-out for the 555
subpostmasters who defeated the Post Office in a legal battle.
May 2021: The Post Office has contacted hundreds of people it might have
wrongly prosecuted for financial crimes.
May 2021: The miscarriages of justice involving subpostmasters are the most
disturbing element of the Post Office Horizon scandal – but it goes much
deeper.
May 2021: The supplier at the centre of the Post Office Horizon scandal has
so far escaped the ramifications of its role in the biggest miscarriage of
justice in UK history.
May 2021: Another two former subpostmasters have had their convictions for
financial crimes overturned, following a hearing in Southwark Crown Court.
May 2021: The government inquiry into the Post Office Horizon scandal is
set to be made statutory with the power to compel witnesses and evidence.
May 2021: The government confirmed that the inquiry into the Post Office
Horizon IT scandal will be given statutory status and wider scope.
May 2021: The Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance has agreed to meet the
former judge heading up the inquiry into the Post Office scandal that
ruined the lives of hundreds of subpostmasters.
May 2021: Criminal Cases Review Commission will not allow pressure on its
resources to prevent subpostmasters seeking a review of their criminal
convictions.
May 2021: Professional IT body wants changes to how computer evidence is
used in court in the wake of the Post Office case.
June 2021: The Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry begins with
subpostmaster campaign group waiting for full details before committing its
support.
June 2021: Whatever the Post Office told government about its decision to
sack investigators examining subpostmaster prosecutions for theft could
identify if the government was part of a cover-up.
June 2021: The Post Office has so far compensated about 400 subpostmasters
who suffered losses as a result of computer errors that they were wrongly
blamed for.
July 2021: Another 10 subpostmasters are set to have their criminal
convictions quashed as part of one of the biggest miscarriage of justice in
British history.
July 2021: The government has made no contact with subpostmasters two
months after it said it would work with them to ensure they get speedy and
fair compensation.
July 2021: The cost of a scheme set up to compensate subpostmasters who
were victims of the Horizon IT scandal will exceed £300m.
July 2021: The government will pay interim compensation within weeks to
subpostmasters who were wrongly convicted of crimes due to computer errors.
August 2021: A further four subpostmasters are set to have their wrongful
convictions overturned in the latest development in the Post Office Horizon
scandal.
August 2021: The government has failed to provide fair compensation to the
subpostmasters who exposed the full extent of the Horizon scandal to the
world.
August 2021: Subpostmasters demand more clarity on Horizon public inquiry
before committing their support.
September 2021: Six more subpostmaster convictions referred for appeal in
Post Office IT scandal.
September 2021: Government minister holds secret meeting with Post Office
Horizon scandal victims.
October 2021: The public inquiry into a scandal that saw subpostmasters
imprisoned after being blamed for accounting shortfalls will hold its first
public hearing early next month.
October 2021: A government minister investigating the controversial Horizon
IT project in 2000 described the Post Office board of directors as
‘appalling, short-sighted and partisan’.
November 2021: The behaviour of Post Office senior management during the
Horizon scandal was so egregious that the supplier of the faulty software
has escaped a large financial penalty.
November 2021: Former Fujitsu staff who gave evidence in subpostmaster
trials have been questioned by police for a second time.
November 2021: Former subpostmasters convicted of crimes based on data from
error-prone Post Office computer system continue to embark on appeals.
November 2021: The first hearing in the Post Office Horizon scandal public
inquiry hears why victims should be paid compensation immediately.
November 2021:The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission is
investigating eight potential miscarriages of justice linked with faulty
Post Office IT system.
November 2021: The Post Office will waive professional legal privilege for
documents relating to legal advice it received regarding subpostmaster
prosecutions.
November 2021 A total number of 65 subpostmasters have now had criminal
convictions overturned in Post Office Horizon scandal.
November 2021 Subpostmasters asked to withdraw support for Post Office
scandal inquiry.
November 2021: Seven more subpostmasters have been cleared after the Post
Office charged them for crimes caused by its faulty Horizon software.
November 2021: The Post Office made clear its support for a change in UK
law regarding computer evidence that was making prosecution ‘onerous’ – a
change which later helped to wrongfully convict subpostmasters.
November 2021: The chair of the Post Office scandal public inquiry has
confirmed the compensation of a group of subpostmasters will be revisited.
December 2021: Government must go further after agreeing to pay
compensation for wrongly convicted subpostmasters.
December 2021: Pressure on government to pay fair compensation to
subpostmasters left out of current schemes.
January 2022: Almost 100 MPs have backed a call for the government to
reverse its decision to exclude 555 subpostmasters from fair compensation.
January 2022: A parliamentary select committee was told that the Post
Office is unable to access information to accurately calculate compensation
for some Horizon scandal victims.
January 2022: The Post Office received subsidies worth over £1bn last year,
including a £685m payment just last month, in a scheme labelled Post Office
Historical Matters Compensation.
January 2022: Government widens subpostmaster miscarriage of justice
compensation scheme in Horizon scandal.
January 2022: Government officials are open to finding a way to properly
compensate victims of the Horizon scandal without setting a dangerous legal
precedent.
January 2022: The subpostmaster campaign group responsible for exposing the
Post Office Horizon scandal is to meet with the government to discuss fair
compensation for their suffering.
January 2022: Fujitsu cannot hide away as taxpayers pick up the bill for
the Post Office scandal triggered by its IT system, say peers.
February 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal are being denied
the millions of pounds they are owed as the government delays compensation
resolution.
February 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal are due to tell
their devastating stories to the statutory inquiry.
February 2022: MPs are demanding urgent action by the government to provide
full compensation to a group of 555 Post Office Horizon scandal victims who
have so far been left out.
February 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal have been
suffering in silence for many years, but the current public inquiry is
giving them a voice, and people are listening.
February 2022: Horizon inquiry questioning raises hopes of fair
compensation for victims so far left out.
February 2022: Government set to backtrack on untenable position on
subpostmaster compensation.
March 2022: The Post Office and Fujitsu failed to alert subpostmasters to a
software error that caused them to be wrongly blamed for accounting
shortfalls.
March 2022: Horizon inquiry hearing sheds light on subpostmaster
federation’s role in hushing up IT problems.
March 2022: 555 subpostmasters to get fair compensation after government
U-turn on its stance on High Court settlement.
March 2022: Compensation goal finally in sight for 555 Post Office scandal
victims, after 13 year campaign.
April 2022: Fujitsu bags £430m government contracts despite rising cost of
Post Office Horizon scandal.
April 2022: The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission expects more
subpostmasters with potential wrongful convictions to come forward.
April 2022: Former subpostmasters who were wrongfully convicted and
punished for crimes have not yet received full compensation over a year
after their convictions were overturned.
April 2022: A former Fujitsu worker has been questioned under caution for
the third time as police investigate potential perjury in trials of
subpostmasters wrongfully convicted of financial crimes.
May 2022: Paula Vennells could be stripped of her CBE as the Honours
Forfeiture Committee commits to reconsider its award in the light of the
Post Office Horizon scandal.
May 2022: Lawyer negotiating compensation for victims of Post Office
scandal says the two sides are ‘poles apart’ on valuations.
May 2022: Inquiry into Post Office scandal moves to Scotland, with
differences in English and Scottish law raising further serious questions
about subpostmaster prosecutions.
May 2022: The chair of the Post Office Horizon scandal inquiry has brought
forward hearings about compensation as victims warn that at this rate
“people will die” before they get anything.
May 2022: The Criminal Cases Review Commission is to contact 88 more
potentially wrongfully convicted Post Office workers.
May 2022: The Post Office Horizon IT system at the centre of a national
scandal will be replaced by 2025, with a supplier expected to be named in
August.
May 2022: Victims of the Post Office Horizon scandal in Scotland raise
further questions about Post Office and government conduct.
May 2022: Government accused of ‘passing the buck’ and ‘not knowing what it
is talking about’ after stating it has no plans to review court rules on
computer evidence.
May 2022: Computer Weekly spoke to the barristers at Henderson Chambers
that fought the Post Office in the High Court to expose the widest
miscarriage of justice in UK history.
June 2022: Two more Post Office Horizon scandal victims have had their
wrongful convictions overturned.
June 2022: The 555 subpostmasters who exposed the depth of the Post Office
Horizon scandal could finally be fairly compensated.
June 2022: Forensic accounting firm that ‘knows where the bodies are
buried’ will be released from confidentiality obligations by the Post
Office to give evidence to public inquiry.
June 2022: Lawyers negotiating the compensation valuations for former
subpostmasters who suffered wrongful convictions have brought in
independent judicial scrutiny to break an impasse.
June 2022: Subpostmaster campaign group is a step closer to achieving what
it was originally set up to do as government launches compensation scheme
for its members who did not receive fair payouts.
July 2022: More former subpostmasters have their wrongful convictions for
theft and fraud overturned in the Court of Appeal.
July 2022: When the Post Office’s lie about the Horizon system failed to
silence subpostmaster critics, it took more extreme measures, say victims
of the scandal.
September 2022: The Met Police have interviewed a former subpostmaster as
part of an investigation into potential perjury by former Fujitsu staff.
September 2022: Chair of statutory public inquiry into the Post Office
Horizon scandal has aired his disappointment over the slow progress in
making interim payments to victims.
October 2022: The public inquiry into the Post Office scandal has begun
phase two with a request for adjournment amid allegations that the Post
Office is failing to disclose relevant documents.
October 2022: Victims demand that the perpetrators of the Post Office
Horizon IT scandal face the public inquiry.
October 2022: Fujitsu’s part in causing the extreme suffering of
subpostmasters will be made clear as the IT supplier begins giving evidence
at a statutory inquiry.
October 2022: A dereliction of duty saw subpostmaster federation ignore its
members when IT problems hit and allowed the Post Office destroy their
lives.
October 2022: Politicians are keeping up the pressure to block government
contracts being awarded to Fujitsu because of its role in the Post Office
Horizon scandal.
October 2022: Problems reported with the Post Office’s Horizon IT system
before its roll-out should have been regarded as a “show-stopper”.
October 2022: Horizon system code writers lacked basic programming skills,
according to the task force set up to investigate reported problems with
the controversial software.
October 2022: Trials of the Horizon computer system in Post Office branches
in 1999 led to a warning from subpostmasters that software problems meant
“a tragedy was not far away”.
November 2022: ‘Hardball’ negotiations between the government, the Post
Office and ICL meant subpostmasters were ignored and thrown into a tragedy
that could have been averted.
November 2022: Post Office investigators were so convinced that
subpostmasters were cooking the books that they failed to investigate
alleged IT problems, a public inquiry has been told.
November 2022: SCCRC has referred six cases of potential wrongful
convictions of subpostmasters to the High Court of Justiciary.
November 2022: A former Fujitsu technology expert who defended the Horizon
system’s robustness in court was unhappy after being ‘manoeuvred’ into
acting as an expert witness.
November 2022: Insider tells public inquiry that the Post Office continued
to roll out the controversial Horizon system despite a ‘considerable’
number of errors, because it was too committed.
November 2022: Former members of the ICL team developing software for the
Post Office Horizon EPOSS system were unqualified and engaged in poor
software development practices.
November 2022: The Post Office IT scandal inquiry’s appointed expert IT
witness was “troubled” by the lack of integrity of data from the Horizon
system that was used to send people to prison.
November 2022: Telegram from British Embassy in Tokyo to UK government
reveals pressure on ministers to sign off controversial contract.
November 2022: The National Federation of Subpostmasters (NFSP)
deliberately kept stories of Horizon errors quiet because it “did not want
to kill the project”.
December 2022: The Post Office was ‘keen’ to make subpostmasters cover
unexplained accounting shortfall as its business struggled, public inquiry
hears.
December 2022: The second phase of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal
raised more questions over who did what, when and where, with shocking
revelations at every turn.
December 2022: The Criminal Cases Review Commission wants former
subpostmasters to come forward if they think they were prosecuted by the
Post Office based on data from the Horizon computer system.
January 2023: Alan Bates, who fought for decades to expose the Post Office
Horizon IT scandal, says it would be inappropriate to accept an OBE when
former Post Office CEO Paula Vennells holds
1
2
xNY.io | Palantir Technologies Board of Directors - Securities Fraud and Computer Crimes
by Gunnar Larson 09 Aug '24
by Gunnar Larson 09 Aug '24
09 Aug '24
Dear Palantir Board of Directors:
You have yet to respond to xNY.io’s February 8, 2022 memo concerning
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oej5gM5wuftu68eVkXTR4wWqoHREP2zg3nwlH1H…>
a reasonable request for the resignation of Mr. Peter Thiel from the Board
of Directors of your esteemed organization. Making matters worse,
Palantir’s Board of Directors failed to respond to xNY.io’s February 18,
2022 memo urging
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NMs-8HFD_Rrnkw4ePUhQSvJSGwhU70F9/view?usp=…>
Palantir’s Board of Directors to act in resonance with the law.
-
Today’s correspondence
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRuyS6IUS-8j8yKjOvs7Mx1V85zbMGfg6hyV6g2…>
(memo attached) mints xNY.io’s overall concern of being victim to
Palantir’s Board of Directors conspiracy to commit Computer Crimes and
Securities Fraud.
-
xNY.io has made 185 highlights to the Prosecuting Computer Crimes Manual
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/11tbgHgDg8qagomO-NBffvIFpxXKmBC3g/view?usp=…>,
issued by the DOJ Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal
Section.
-
xNY.io has made 85 highlights to the FDIC’s Office of Inspector
General’s investigation
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mTHY9KMc6pK9T-brBhweEJlWfbka0fTg/view?usp=…>
outlining Palantir’s Board of Director’s likely exploiting vulnerabilities
in your system to conduct malicious cyber activities.
-
xNY.io now has logical concern of active Securities Fraud
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securities_fraud> sponsored by Palantir’s
Board of directors that may be a threat to xNY.io’s international
enterprise (chart detail attached).
Seemingly, Meta’s Board of Directors (FB) embody xNY.io’s similar, logical
approach.
How would you like to proceed? Warm regards,
Gunnar Larson
--
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…>
- Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…>
- Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io>
Date: Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Imploration of Peter Thiel Resignation, Palantir Technologies
Board of Directors
To: <Investors(a)palantir.com>, <investor(a)fb.com>
Cc: cypherpunks <cypherpunks(a)lists.cpunks.org>
Dear Palantir Board Members:
xNY.io seeks Palantir's immediate response on the extremely reasonable and
overall logical request regarding Mr. Thiel, alleviating any co-conspiracy
concerns of your directorate. We are tracking Palantir's Board now behind
the reasonable 02/14/22 deadline at the expense of xNY.io (given our
general perception of xNY.io related files being hosted on your platform).
- Humbly, Palantir's Board may want to assure the United States that
Palantir's Board is not sponsoring the next Cambridge Analytica.
- Furthermore, xNY.io is designed <https://xny.io/whitepaper>to
sidestep such unnecessary circumstances
- xNY.io points to the New York Post's report
<https://nypost.com/2021/08/25/fbi-palantir-glitch-allowed-unauthorized-acce…>
on
a "glitch" in Palantir's system allowing Cambridge Analytica type access to
private data.
*Make no mistake, it is not xNY.io's fault if Mr. Thiel is potentially
sacrificing the purity of Palantir's Board.*
What does Palantir have to lose in doing the right thing here? xNY.io
further hints that it is not our overall problem if Palantir's Directorship
wishes to self-destruct against scientific law <https://xny.io/> (aka
modern logic). History provides the epic example
<https://thecapital.io/article/directorates-who-discredit-truthful-witnesses…>
of
Enron and a cunning Board of Directors of misleaders, a team of flimflam
artists who used sly rhetorical skills to bamboozle the public, turning
night into day. In this conception, directorates tell stories only in order
to seduce and beguile regulators who fall prey to the advocate’s
star-crossed tricks.
- Potentially best said by Senator John Mccain, “And the persons who
ultimately are harmed by all of this, of course, is the average consumer,
the average citizen, who has no knowledge, unless it paid attention to this
hearing, of the extent of the manipulations that have been carried out by
the largest financial institutions in America and, indeed, probably the
world.”
Forgive the efficient, yet candid locker room talk above. We are not saying
Palantir's Board is crooked. But, you can imagine xNY.io's next
correspondence should not be necessary.
Very respectfully yours,
Gunnar Larson
--
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io/> | Bank.org <http://bank.org/>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…>
-
Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…>
- Entrepreneurship
and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:20 PM Gunnar Larson <g(a)xny.io> wrote:
> Dear Palantir Board of Directors:
>
> Today’s memo implores
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oej5gM5wuftu68eVkXTR4wWqoHREP2zg3nwlH1H…>
> the resignation of Mr. Peter Thiel from the Board of Directors of your
> esteemed organization.
>
> -
>
> Reasonable expectations support this resignation on or before Monday
> February 14, 2022 at Noon EST.
> -
>
> Failure in the resolution of the resignation concerned may be a threat
> to xNY.io’s international enterprise (detailed below).
> -
>
> Simple logic behind our request coincides with the February 7, 2022,
> 4:07 PM EST
> <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-02-07/peter-thiel-to-leave-met…>
> Bloomberg News report of Mr. Thiel’s resignation from Meta’s Board of
> Directors. Bloomberg cited that Mr. Thiel plans to explore political
> endeavors that perhaps would be a conflict of interest to sacred Board
> Director entitlement responsibilities.
>
>
> Kindly find the attached memo addressed to the attention of Palantir's
> Board of Directors.
>
> Respectfully yours,
>
> Gunnar Larson
> --
> *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io/> | Bank.org <http://bank.org/>*
> MSc
> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> -
> Digital Currency
> MBA
> <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship
> and Innovation (ip)
>
> G(a)xNY.io
> +1-646-454-9107
> New York, New York 10001
>
2
11
26 Jul '24
Ms. Scott:
NY-DFS recently asked for public comment concerning "Proposed Guidance on
Assessment of the Character and Fitness of Directors, Senior Officers, and
Managers" mentioned here:
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/industry_guidance/industry_letters/il20230509_guidan…
.
xNY.io - Bank.org asks if the NY-DFS will extend deadline for public
comment to August 5, 2023 from June 30, 2023.
As requested by NY-DFS, today we provide (in a separate attachment)
evidence of any documented exceptions to compliance with the "Suggested
Questions to Facilitate Initial and Ongoing Assessment of Designated
Persons’ Character and Fitness."
We have collated 19 references comprising 205 highlights that touch on the
five key areas below:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FTRRFFhQHDxf-oR9WOZz0a2gRtC9ZWVO.
-Harassment and Discrimination Policies
-Conflict of Interest Policy
-Insider Trading Policy
-Records Management Policy
-Corporate Opportunity Policy
xNY.io - Bank.org is seeking NY-DFS' extension for public comment to August
5, 2023 so that the New York Banking community has time to complete Q2-23
earnings call disclosures.
As documented in the above 19 references, we feel extra time for public
comment is warranted to ensure that xNY.io - Bank.org did not play a
significant role or otherwise contribute in a meaningful way to the conduct
that led to regulatory action or proceeding without ample notice.
Per point one of NY-DFS' "Suggested Questions to Facilitate Initial and
Ongoing Assessment of Designated Persons’ Character and Fitness," can you
kindly acknowledge that you have reviewed and understand our appeal seeking
extension for public comment to August 5, 2023?
We hope to hear from you before June 30, 2023 given obvious factors.
Sending you the very best regards.
Thank you,
Gunnar
--
Gunnar Larson
xNY.io | Bank.org
MSc - Digital Currency
MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-917-580-8053
New York, New York 10001
1
22
Meta Platforms, Inc. Board of Directors - USPTO, Digital Assets and Moscow Exchange
by Gunnar Larson 24 Jul '24
by Gunnar Larson 24 Jul '24
24 Jul '24
Ms. Chollett:
Thank you, kindly, for continued correspondence related to Meta Board
questions specific to xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC's concern to protecting
cross-border digital asset innovation.
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC first became alarmed through Meta's obvious
digital asset market problems related to Libra, Diem, Novi and USDP.
Through Meta's continued digital identity transitions, xNY.io - Bank.org,
PBC has pioneered cross-border digital asset logic(s). Moreover, the Moscow
Exchange and Meta introduced market events over March that jeopardize
digital asset market purty. Ms, Chollett, xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC will not
pay for market effects related to Meta's cross-border disruption of digital
asset innovation, related to Meta's obvious mark exactness (by definition)
to the Moscow Exchange.
*Ms. Chollett, we cannot concern ourselves with Meta's intentions, good or
otherwise, given clear problems that exacerbate market risk: *
- March 11, 2022
<https://www.businessinsider.in/tech/news/russia-moves-to-declare-meta-an-ex…>:
Russia's leader, who is in charge of the Moscow Exchange cites Meta as an
'extremist organization' ...
- March 14, 2022
<https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ff9f1af5-cc8a-473a-822b-8890…>:
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC Benjamin G. Murray published SDNY insights
to a Russian State-Sponsored TV Network's Attempt to Dismiss Copyright
Lawsuit On Fair Use Grounds Denied.
- March 17, 2022
<https://www.sberbank.com/news-and-media/press-releases/article?newsID=cd44d…>:
Moscow Exchange is the backend to Russia's largest bank, Sber. The
announcement on 03/17/22 confirmed Sber (via the Moscow Exchange
technology, at various levels) would issue digital assets.
- March 18, 2022
<https://cointelegraph.com/news/meta-files-8-digital-asset-and-web-3-0-trade…>:
Meta Platforms Inc. filed USPTO mark applications for a mark EXACTLY
DEFINED to that of the Moscow Exchange.
- Ms. Chollette, below my signature you will find Meta's filing
numbers and descriptions related to a mark defined as Moscow
Exchange, with
plans to engage the mark in commerce related to digital assets
and virtual
reality.
- March 24, 2022
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f_fq1GaKNaAUGEyztdm-oMtIuEW2yXj4C5aoN0G…>:
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC contacted meta, with a memo introducing our direct
plan to protect cross-border digital asset innovation. Ms. Chollette,
please note that Russia has labeled Meta as an 'extremist organization' ...
So who really knows what the Moscow Exchange will thi
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC is a very reasonable digital asset pioneer, and
sitting in Manhattan the jury is in on market contributions from Libra,
Diem, Novi and USDP. Ms, Chollette, Meta and the Moscow Exchange matter
really suggest only losing marketplace contributions, obviously potentially
devastating digital asset marketplace innovation(s). We aim to solve this
problem immediately:
1. Ms. Collette, xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC recently shared Citigroup's
Metaverse and Money
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1REoa87GCmt2uhDp7ZYswbTRw4ygQgjsL/view?usp=…>
whitepaper, with 33 highlights to our grave concern to Meta's potential
marketplace delinquency related to Meta's mark exactness to Moscow
Exchange.
2. Furthermore, Mr. Zuckerberg and Mr. Putin are both highlight quotes
to Citigroup's Metaverse and Money research.
3. With the date order, footnotes, and highlights xNY.io -Bank.org, PBC
kindly petitions Meta's board to understand the opportunity ... The Moscow
Exchange is not our problem, and for whatever reason Meta will have no
opportunity to make mark exactness our problem.
The United State of America's cross-border approach to digital asset
innovation will be cultivated, fostered and protected by xNY.io - Bank.org,
PBC.
We aim not to be adversarial with Meta, but we will stop at no cost to
invest in claim rewards if necessary. Perhaps, we can organize a time to
discuss potential resolutions in the immediate term.
xNY.io - Bank.org, PBC must reserve all rights specific to harm from March
14, 2022
<https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ff9f1af5-cc8a-473a-822b-8890…>
and March 18, 2022
<https://cointelegraph.com/news/meta-files-8-digital-asset-and-web-3-0-trade…>
market
events.
Please feel free to call or email anytime.
Sending you the very best from New York City,
Gunnar Larson
--
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…>
- Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…>
- Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001
97320155: Online social networking and dating services, including a
specific branch tailored for networking between cryptocurrency investors.
97320153: Design and development of computer hardware and software relating
to Web3, including gaming, e-commerce, blockchain transactions, etc.
97320149: Entertainment and electronic publishing services, partly within
virtual reality.
97320147: Telecommunication services for electronic assets held on its
platform.
97320146: Financial transaction processing services relating to tokens,
blockchain assets, cryptocurrencies and other virtual assets.
97320144: Advertising services via virtual or augmented reality networks
and the metaverse.
97320140: Wearable peripherals for video games connected to virtual reality.
97320136: Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application, such
as for user authentication, online charitable fundraising and most notably,
for hardware or e-wallets.
1
23
Re: [ot][spam][writing][crazy] Non-Canon Traffick Boss Spinoffs - The Reboot
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 26 Jun '24
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 26 Jun '24
26 Jun '24
——
traffick boss works on building a balloon.
he’s at a balloon-building activity at a fair. with kids and community
members like rebel worker 2.
2
53
https://litigationfinancejournal.com/litigating-universal-cognitive-liberty/
Litigating Universal Cognitive Liberty
Freedom of thought is recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (UDHR). Interestingly,, cognitive liberty is not recognized as an
international human right. Some want to change that, making the argument
that humanity has the right to be free to think whatever they want (freedom
of thought).
The Ottawa Citizen reports
<https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-leaders-saw-…>
that
the Canadian armed forces have launched ‘psychological operations’ as an
experiment in government propaganda to counter civil disobedience.
International human rights scholars are quick to point out that the lack of
protection of cognitive liberty in such instances is due to the relative
lack of technology capable of directly interfering with mental autonomy at
the time the core human rights treaties were created.
Similar to a ransomware attack, the technology behind such operations can
be abused. Canada is said to have exploited advanced technologies without
the authority to do so. Even worse, it is alleged that Canada forcefully
abused technology in the unsanctioned production of reports that appeared
to be aimed at cognitive activities of Canadians.
- Other reports highlight similar technologies being explored by the New
York City Police Department.
- In 2021
<https://gothamist.com/news/city-settles-lawsuit-protesters-who-accused-nypd…>,
members of the National Lawyers Guild won $650,000 in litigation financed
fees from abuse of the technology in New York.
The semantics empowering freedom of thought as a human right hold new
opportunities for modern international recognition of the right to
cognitive liberty.
1
11
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aeK8X8-2KDZ8tQPN5ksaUCXcxH9tbjexsUbW1ol…
xNY.io
CRYPTOBANK
Table of Contents
Introduction 2
Focus, Goals and Objective(s) 3
Strategic Intent 4
Innovation Strategy 5
Pioneering Human Resources (HR) Management in Banking 6
The Bitcoin Blockchain, Human/Civil Rights and Computer Crimes 7
Goldman Sachs’ Organization HR Management Analysis (MoneyGram and Ripple) 8
www.JUMO.World and Banking Africa 9
Earth_ID: Because Owning Your Identity is a Human Right 10
CryptoBank Environmental Analysis 11
The NEXO.io Conundrum 12
The Fireblocks Conundrum 13
Computer Software and the Blockchain Platform 14
Virtual Currency: Computer Software Protocols and Processes 15
Bank.org: Revolutionary Approaches to Agile Innovation 16
Conclusion 17
Bibliography 19
Introduction
Crypto and Blockchain are each a Human Right.
For all, everywhere.
How does New York based bank fraud happen from the inside? People who
commit crimes comprise departments and divisions of corporate
organizations, and some current Human Resources (HR) management cultures
lend well to the committing of crimes.
What organizational HR management design structures are at play to
architectect such fraud for bespoke juristical instances?
Is there a unique opportunity for a fresh and clean New York-based
international bank such as Bank.org?
xNY.io argues that modern and innovative Executive Suites pioneer
organizational HR management with the CEO and CFO leading the pack as the
most ethical example for members in their organization. This key
distinction calls for leaders to always adhere to a very strict, yet
progressive, standard of ethics, even when it’s inconvenient.
World renowned executive Jack McCullough suggests strict adherence is
necessary, especially when it’s inconvenient. McCullough says that if
you’re seen as a CEO and CFO “who will compromise when convenient, this
approach will cause colleagues to consider all the talk about ethics to be
lip service” (McCullough 2019).
The leadership at xNY.io is clear-eyed, recognizing the importance of an
extensive review program which seeks to explore all aspects of the
following criteria as part of Legal, Compliance, and Governance (Bloomberg
2021), which is our internal due diligence framework based on first class
industry standards and best practices (xNY.io | Bank.org n.d.).
In summary, this HR management innovation essay outlines and explores three
key concerns for modern Bank and CryptoBank organizations. These concerns
are signaled by our regulators who rightly suggest that it is critically
important that the organizers identify, at the beginning of the process, an
available management team and board of directors (NY-DFS 2008):
The theory of modern virtual currency cross-border regulation logic (Larson
2020a).
How to protect xNY.io’s strategic partnership with Bank.org and its mandate
to pioneer innovation(s) and noble advancement of modern international
banking?
Whereas, it is essential to safeguard virtual currency and its potential to
galvanize international, economic and social advancement of all peoples
(United Nations 1948).
Most importantly, what organizational HR management structures are
necessary to execute the proposed xNY.io and hybrid model framework, while
engaging agile innovation to explore the potential of growing Bank.org into
the World’s Best Bank and headquartered in New York (NY-DFS 2019)?
Focus, Goals and Objective(s)
Why would a New York bank build organizational HR strategies with the sole
purpose of taking advantage of the most vulnerable for exorbitant profit?
xNY.io’s focus is to fill a need in clarifying New York’s virtual currency
standards to achieve progressive innovation while constantly promoting
respect for human rights and personal freedoms by progressive measures,
national and international, to secure their universal and effective
recognition and observance across all global territories of business,
protecting all peoples and all nations (United Nations 1948).
Our simple strategy rests in the fact that virtual currency has
cross-border utilities (European Commission 2021). Our real world
experience has uncovered the strategy of a New York bank's misemployed
Manhattan Island as a walled garden for bad HR management camps while
wrongfully profiting off of the back of the most vulnerable across global
markets (Law 360 2021). Our goal is to profit off the pivot from the
textbook definition of marketplace manipulation, discussed herein related
to the feasibility of automating stock market manipulation (Association for
Computing Machinery 2020).
The Supreme Court placed emphasis on the central role of deception to the
concept of fraud.“ (T)he words ‘to defraud’ . . . primarily mean to cheat,
. . . usually signify the deprivation of something of value by trick,
deceit, chicane, or overreaching, and . . . do not extend to theft by
violence, or to robbery or burglary.” (Hammerschmidt v. United States
1924).
Bank.org feels confident in our knowledge and our direct dialogue with over
100 of the world’s leading scholars on the subject of international law:
(Morris 2008)
The International Criminal Court investigates and punishes people for
genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes (Wikipedia 2021a).
The International Court of Justice, sometimes referred to as the World
Court, has two major functions. Firstly, it settles disputes, which the
member countries may bring before it. Secondly, it may give its opinions on
legal matters (Wikipedia 2021b).
The objective of xNY.io’s research essay summarizes the discussion of New
York bank organizations and the corresponding HR management architectures
designed to target maximizing profits through conscious marketplace
manipulation structures. The best xNY.io CryptoBank must be concerned with
pioneering a business beyond leveraging computer crimes, a marketplace
manipulation matter associated with current New York BitLicense
architecture and subject to our attention related to
cross-border/international organized groups that are cyber-based in New
York (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 1989).
Strategic Intent
Imagine trying to open the best bank in the world and running up against
BitLicense regulatory arbitrage (Poster 2019) just a few Manhattan blocks
away.
Composing a richly robust innovation strategy calls for a clear and honest
appraisal of current marketplace conditions and identifying the firm’s
current status. This requires xNY.io to not only be ambitious but also
extremely articulate in outlining our strategic intent. We see our key
competitive advantage in cleverley leveraging our vision cohesively with
all available resources and modern ideals of Bank.org.
Bank.org is aware that our uniqueness is very difficult for competitors to
imitate. In her book Strategic Management for Technological Innovation,
Mellissa Schilling suggests that the New York banking sector may be
characterized as an oligopolistic industry in that there is a low degree of
rivalry. Schilling explains that sometimes competitors choose to avoid
head-to-head competition as a price collusion tactic (Schilling 2019).
Being extremely clear and transparent, xNY.io's business models emphasize
taking advantage of our competitors who have designed global regulatory
abtrigatre frameworks at the expense of our customers (Buchak et al. 2017).
Bank.org's stakeholder analysis highlights that many New York banks have
ignored the ethical and moral implications of designing HR management
structures with the sole purpose of training employees to act as
footmen/footwomen in defrauding a global customer base. Furthermore, these
bad actors revel in the naivety of potential rivals and government
regulators as an operative procedure of HR management.
Through an analysis of the best agile innovation strategy for execution,
xNY.io and Bank.org have partnered to engage both backward vertical
integration AND horizontal integration techniques (Tarver & James 2021):
xNY.io is vertically integrating backwards by producing our own advanced
blockchain technology for global payments.
Bank.org aims to actively engage leveraged buyouts of competitor banks, a
practice that is considered horizontal integration (Kenton & James 2021).
>From the very beginning, xNY.io and Bank.org’s ethical and moral incentives
have been strategically integrated into a modern and innovative hybrid
infrastructure. Spanning key global functions including (but not limited
to) reserve management, international legal counsel, and public and
government affairs and relations, we consider ethics to be a quality
management concern. Honestly, the implications of our strategic intent are
derived from the morals of our founders who seek to efficiently secure the
smooth function of our cross-border operations.
Innovation Strategy
We recognize our competitors see modern innovation as merely improving
efficiency of obsolete legacy bank systems and processes to keep their
operations afloat. It is extremely troublesome that many New York bank HR
leaders’ modi operandi detail strategies of seeking new revenue channels
that target the most vulnerable across first to third world markets (Ripple
2013a).
As part of our ethical leadership agenda, articulating xNY.io’s strategic
intent enables the firm to incorporate our innovation practice into
Bank.org’s cross-border development and rollout. Capital investments are
required as part of a multidimensional performance architecture, along with
real-time systems and computational analyses.
Our honest deliberation and critical assessment of xNY.io’s strategic
intent and development of new computational technologies brought to light
the concern of competitors' engagement in computer crimes discussed in the
following section.
We recognize that true innovation goes beyond juvenile process
efficiencies. Our innovation strategy constantly anticipates the future by
recognizing where industry peers are failing today. This allows us to
identify and execute products and services that are better - extremely
better - than what the industry offers today.
Schilling notes that successful and innovative firms question existing
price performance assumptions. They attract customers by developing and
introducing products that extend well beyond current market requirements
and help mold the market’s expectations for the future (Schilling 2019).
This separates us from our competitors' desperate attempts to cut costs
rather than ethically addressing and improving their HR operations with
corresponding moral incentives.
Pioneering Human Resources (HR) Management in Banking
As international scholars (Mills 2006), our founders believe in the future
of virtual currencies and blockchain platform computer software. This
belief has been cultivated and nurtured by some of the most recognized
pioneers of the global blockchain industry (Bourne et al. 2018). We
consider virtual currency and blockchain technology to be precious,
appreciating assets with various growing benefits over the course of one’s
lifetime.
Rolling Stone profiles the New York bank JP Morgan Chase and the bank’s HR
management techniques, highlighting the conscious disregard of the ethical
and moral standards from Chase’s Executive Suite knowingly excited the
peddling of bad products stuffed with scratch-and-dent loans to investors
without disclosing the obvious defects of the underlying loans (Taibbi
2014).
Chase has repeated deal after deal with the same poor and fraudulent
organizational HR management methodology, as did many other banks. Rolling
Stone goes on to say, “It’s theft on a scale that blows the mind.”
New York banks and Silicon Valley technology firms have a long history of
not only challenging but actively attacking beliefs that virtual currency
and blockchain are innovative tools for means of payment and stores of
value, going so far as to launch an ever-popular campaign: “Bitcoin has no
value at all” (Torpey 2018).
It is safe to say that between New York and Silicon Valley, many
organizations, through their various HR management structures, have made
calculated efforts to kill the blockchain economy before it even got off
the ground (Al-Naji et al. 2018).
For example, New York, Europe and Africa are connected by a freeway of
cross-border arbitrage frameworks. Due to easily exploitable laws in
developing countries, some BitLicensees’ operations straddle New York,
Europe and Africa to evade detection and prosecution from law enforcement.
Through various HR management structures, New York banks have consciously
exacerbated regulatory loopholes resulting in virtual currency market
manipulation affecting international computer technology systems and
software such as the Bitcoin blockchain (Conway 2020).
Speaking generally, at least during the Bitlicense’s 2015-2020
implementation phase, New York banks likely leveraged the BitLicense
seeking to increase profits from cross-border virtual currency market
manipulation (Pettinger 2019).
The entire design for executing a loophole virtual currency standard only
comes into practice if a group of New York HR managers, at the direction of
the Executive Suite, puts together a scheme in secret to manipulate a bunch
of technical rules that laymen don’t understand to deprive people of their
money (Bagchi 2020).
>From the position of absolute and essential need of becoming a leading
international bank, Bank.org has no other choice than to pioneer a
necessary HR culture that supports our primary activities of operation. It
is true that xNY.io came into existence as a tech-based response to the
stated problems that specifically addresses both the threats of future
damage and the current cross-border computer crime merry-go-round
responsible for extortionate damage already inflicted.
“We’ve got to change the cost-benefit calculus of criminals and
nation-states who believe they can compromise U.S. networks, steal U.S.
financial and intellectual property, and hold our critical infrastructure
at risk, all without incurring any risk themselves...” (Wray 2020).
The Bitcoin Blockchain, Human/Civil Rights and Computer Crimes
Bank.org is wise to objectively research and strategically organize its HR
leadership position as a pioneer, in comparison to current New York bank
management structures. Given that honest and fair dealing of virtual
currency is critical to blockchain technology, should admitted felons and
serial miscreants (Martens & Martens 2020) be allowed to further expand
their racket via global regulatory arbitrage and/or computer crimes?
Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin whitepaper states, “What is needed is an
electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust,
allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other
without the need for a trusted third party” (Nakamoto 2008).
New York State Human/Civil rights laws are applicable internationally. “If
a resident person or domestic corporation violates any provision of this
article by virtue of the provisions of this section, this article shall
apply to such person or corporation in the same manner and to the same
extent as such provisions would have applied had such act been committed
within this state except that the penal provisions of such article shall
not be applicable” (N.Y. Executive Law 2019).
Congress amended the definition of “protected computer” to make clear that
this term includes computers outside of the United States so long as they
affect interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United
States. This change addresses situations where an attacker within the
United States attacks a computer system located abroad. This change also
addresses situations in which individuals in foreign countries route
communications through the United States with intent to extort from any
person any money or other item of value, transmitted via interstate or
foreign commerce (U.S. Congress 2002).
Courts have interpreted expansively to define not only schemes to defraud
individuals of money or property, but also schemes to defraud individuals
of intangible interests and rights. Additionally, both mail and wire fraud
statutes have been expanded to include schemes to deprive individuals of
“honest services” (Eltringham 2015).
What organizational HR management techniques are required for an enterprise
to actively convince hundreds, if not thousands, of employees, clients and
customers to pursue their strategy while knowing it was fatally flawed?
Goldman Sachs’ Organization HR Management Analysis (MoneyGram and Ripple)
MoneyGram, which has about 227,000 global money transfer agent locations in
191 countries and territories, was recapitalized in 2008 (same year of
Bitcoin's whitepaper). Goldman Sachs acquired an equity interest of 63
percent in MoneyGram for about $710 million. Per the 2008 agreement,
MoneyGram also received $500 million in debt financing from Goldman Sachs
(Cordeiro 2011).
Walmart is the only MoneyGram agent, for both the Global Funds Transfer and
Financial Paper Products segments, that accounts for more than 10% of
revenue. In 2020, Walmart accounted for 13% of total MoneyGram’s revenue
and 16% in 2019 and 2018. Goldman Sachs (Investor) has a Participation
Agreement with Walmart Inc. (Walmart) under which the Investor is obligated
to pay Walmart certain percentages of any accumulated cash payments
received by the Investor in excess of the Investor's original investment in
the Company (MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL INC 2021).
In 2016, Ripple received New York’s First NY-DFS BitLicense for an
Institutional Use Case of Digital Assets (Larsen 2016). Shortly after being
NY-DFS accredited, Ripple announced it was teaming up with MoneyGram to
test payments using Ripple’s xRP virtual currency. During this time, Ripple
was making headlines as the xRP digital currency had surged — and fallen —
dramatically (Browne 2018). Soon after, Ripple announced a $50 million
investment in MoneyGram snagging a 10% equity stake in the firm. Brad
Garlinghouse, Ripple’s CEO, added that his firm would support MoneyGram’s
“further expansion” into the European and Australian payment corridors (De
2019).
Connecting the dots, MoneyGram is now one of the most expensive transfer
providers (Tierney 2019) on planet Earth. Customers incur fees for postal
mail, telephone calls, electronic mail, and other computerized messaging
services.
Computer crimes as a threat are no less of a threat because it is
contingent, because the speaker does not intend or is unable to carry it
out when the threat was not directly communicated to the MoneyGram customer
as a target, or because the language used might be considered cryptic or
ambiguously not part of the current New York BitLicense mandate.
Ripple simply made MoneyGram’s business more efficient, thus accruing more
profits for Goldman Sachs directed out of Manhattan. From 2019 - 2020,
MoneyGram received more than $40 million in market development fees from
Ripple Labs in return for providing liquidity to its On-Demand Liquidity
(ODL) network. It can be calculated that 10%-15% of the proceeds came from
Walmart customers, who are some of the most disenfranchised Americans
financially.
Over the last five years, through conscious organizational HR management,
Goldman Sachs created layer upon layer of New York BitLicense-related
disguises and cross-border systems under potential conspiracy and plausible
deniability to computer crimes and marketplace manipulation. Goldman Sachs'
various direct and/or indirect BitLicensee connections profit daily from
virtual currency market manipulation computer crimes with cross-border
reach, operating as a large syndicate group from lower Manhattan.
www.JUMO.World and Banking Africa
What is astonishing is that Ripple is powering some of JUMO’s bank
customers (Ripple 2020), in a troublesome manner similar to MoneyGram.
New York banks have a long and profitable history of exploiting regulatory
arbitrage. Similar to the MoneyGram instance, some evidence shows that
Goldman Sachs also seems to have entered Africa. Given that several
enforcement actions and lawsuits in the United States specifically targeted
banks’ treatment of minority borrowers (Taibbi 2014), it may not be
surprising to learn of www.Jumo.World or “JUMO” (Buchak et al. 2017).
A domain extension, in this case “.World” domain, is the targeted subject
area of a computer program. It is a term used in software engineering
(Wikipedia 2021):
During the fourth quarter of 2018, JUMO successfully finalized a $65
million capital raise that was led by Goldman Sachs in New York. JUMO is a
full technology software stack for building and running financial services,
targeted at the world’s most disadvantaged populations.
Today, JUMO operates across numerous African markets including Tanzania,
Ghana, Zambia, Kenya, Uganda, and most recently in Pakistan, with plans to
expand further across the sub-continent.
Since its launch in 2014, more than 15 million people have saved or
borrowed on the JUMO platform, with over $1.6 billion in funds disbursed to
customers. Nearly 70% of JUMO’s customers are micro and small business
owners.
JUMO targets the unbanked population across several emerging and developing
markets. A variety of JUMO’s partnerships with leading banks and mobile
network operators creates a marketplace where consumers can access
financial services and banks can access a new pool of mobile money
customers (Vostok Emerging Finance Ltd 2020).
Given the regulatory environment in Africa, it could be suggested that from
New York, Goldman Sachs and Ripple’s organizational HR management
structures once again aim to profit from some of the most vulnerable of the
human population.
Earth_ID: Because Owning Your Identity is a Human Right
The modus operandi of JUMO’s business is a type of malicious bank software
designed to encrypt or otherwise block access to valuable data (e.g.
Digital Identity) until the victim agrees to provide a specified payment.
The population of the African continent is approximately 1.2 billion
people. Imagine a whole continent of people with no proof of identity and
therefore no chance of having access to financial services, economic
opportunities, or formal employment. These are basic services that are
taken for granted and sadly are all too often denied to so many in our
world today. Many countries in Africa lack the necessary means to establish
and maintain basic systems of identity management, such as the registration
of births, especially for the rural poor and underprivileged (Plumer et al.
2020).
Earth_ID has plans to pilot the launch of it’s decentralized digital
identity platform in collaboration with University of Nicosia’s (UNIC) very
own African Partner, UNICAF. UNICAF has a physical presence on eleven
campuses throughout Sub-Saharan Africa. We welcome the students and staff
of UNICAF to be Earth_ID’s very first adopters, community leaders and
validators in trust to our decentralized identity solution. Goldman Sachs
from New York is a lead investor in UNICAF (Chege 2018).
According to the United Nations Digital Solutions Centre, the creation of a
unique personal United Nations ID (Earth_ID) using blockchain technology,
which is portable across organizations (Dumitriu 2020).
The proposal foresees that every United Nations organization could become a
trusted authority writing information onto the blockchain. The
organizations could run their own nodes separately, while the system will
ensure scalability and interoperability.
The Inspector recommends that the executive heads of the United Nations
organizations support the creation of a United Nations digital ID. This
will have multiple long term positive consequences in terms of saving time
and resources, facilitating staff mobility in allowing certification and
recognition of their knowledge and skills, reducing bureaucracy, and
enhancing system-wide coherence.
The descriptive definition of regulatory arbitrage suggests that New York
banks’ organizational HR management, with direction from the Executive
Suite, seeks to saturate lending to markets with more minorities and worse
socioeconomic conditions (Buchak et al. 2017).
CryptoBank Environmental Analysis
How can xNY.io innovate from underdogs to elite high performers, becoming
the best in the world?
xNY.io - CryptoBank wants to create the best World Crypto Bank known to
humanity, and we plan to do that expeditiously in 40+ countries and fiat
currencies. xNY.io has a problem: We are displeased with Ripple powering
customers like MoneyGram, Santander Bank and the other 300+ banking
customers. Our frustrations hinge on Ripple seeming to be propping up the
same bad banks that more or less rival Bitcoin's entire mission (Larson
2020b).
Furthermore, instead of putting the MoneyGram and other bad traditional
banks out of business, Ripple is looking to profit off of cross-border
payment startups similar to our best World Crypto Bank (Ripple 2013b).
Market segmentation determines groups of customers with common needs and
wants. All over the world, young people strive to make money. Those who are
at the beginning of the life road plan to grow financially. The
high-interest rate of xNY.io deposit accounts will help customers make
desirable choices for healthy and prosperous financial futures. Moreover,
geographically, xNY.io has a keen focus to improve banking in developing
countries on the African continent to help deprived people obtain the
rights of digital identity and interdependent modern bank accounts with
innovative products and services.
Digital asset trading platforms like NEXO.io in Europe powered by
Fireblocks in New York hop from more regulated jurisdictions to less
regulated or unregulated countries, leading to so-called regulatory
arbitrage or currency speculation (Pettinger 2019).
NY-DFS and FDIC regulators have more trouble detecting and blocking illicit
digital asset flows as virtual currency transactions are diverted away from
compliant regulated Fireblocks in New York to unregulated trading gateway
venues and peer-to-peer protocols that are directly against NY-DFS’
BitLicense mandate (FTI Consulting 2021).
The chain of financial service providers includes several intermediaries,
each drawing their own commission against the services provided. These
operating principles date several years back, and it is difficult to make a
paradigm shift from this existing operational hierarchy. This constraint is
being utilized by middlemen and the established market players. Financial
conglomerates use their supremacy, as well, to make sure their operations
continue unchallenged. The industry generally fails to serve a sizable part
of the community and this gap can only be bridged by new players. However,
the strong market hold of the established players makes it seemingly
difficult for innovators to contribute.
The NEXO.io Conundrum
Our role model for creating the best World Crypto Bank is NEXO.io. While
Ripple's business of leveraging digital currency and blockchain technology
is disheartening, the great success of NEXO's crypto bank and card is
impressive. Case in point, NEXO's token and overall business solution is a
better example (Trenchev 2018).
NEXO is a great example for our best World Crypto Bank' but is funded by
Goldman Sachs (Roony 2018), Which could be argued to be worse than Ripple.
Goldman's blockage of crypto/blockchain development in the United States
(U.S. Congress 2002) and Digital Identity in Africa (Plumer et al. 2020)
cannot be overlooked.
While Ripple is supporting the bad behavior of MoneyGram and other
traditional banks with cards, NEXO is just the best bad version of Ripple
funded by Sachs. Both are probably gaming the digital currency market and
global blockchain innovation, and possibly humanity as a whole.
Obviously, NEXO could get into trouble for operating an unregulated bank
fast (Jennings 2018):
Moreover, NEXO is, at various levels, illegal in the United States where
the federal government regulates most banks (NEXO 2019). For example, in
New York, some of the NEXO token benefits are forbidden by NY-DFS
(Sokolowski 2021) .
Nexo doesn't have a Bitlicense, but they still operate in New York
(u/zylstrar 2019). New York State Attorney General Letitia James has made
it clear that virtual currency firms must abide by the BItLicense or risk
being shut down (Sharma 2021).
Additionally, United States authorities could force NEXO to offer Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance on its accounts (Buchak et
al. 2017) .
It could be argued that Ripple (xRP) and NEXO.io (NEXO) built entire global
operations as direct/indirect BitLicensees with intent to profit from
various cross-border computer crimes such as market manipulation while
being partially funded and/or directed out of New York (U.S. Congress 2002).
However, NEXO operates like a bank. To explain, clients put cryptocurrency
in a wallet, borrow against it and receive funds through the NEXO wallet.
NEXO claims it can tap some huge markets that include crypto investors,
crypto miners, and hedge funds. Hence, NEXO looks like an investment bank.
Tellingly, NEXO looks a great deal like Goldman Sachs’ Marcus platform. For
example, both NEXO and Marcus offer loans and savings accounts.
The Fireblocks Conundrum
A few blocks south of Times Square in New York City, Fireblocks (Google
Maps 2021) powers the global operations of NEXO.io headquartered in Europe.
The CEO of Fireblocks has discussed his firm's $135 million investment led
by BNY Mellon and others: “‘While we have no plans to become a bank, we
believe our infrastructure will lend itself perfectly to power an entirely
new era of financial services,’ Shaulov added. ‘Developing products to
bridge digital and traditional assets is foundational to the future of
custody.’ Roman Regelman, BNY Mellon’s asset servicing CEO and digital head
said, ‘Following significant due diligence and market research, we
recognize Fireblocks as a market leader in providing secure technology to
support digital asset services’” (Shome 2021).
As previously noted, New York, Europe and Africa are connected by a freeway
of cross-border arbitrage frameworks. Due to easily exploitable laws in
developing countries, some BitLicensees’ daily operations straddle New
York, Europe and Africa to evade detection and prosecution from law
enforcement (Larsen 2016).
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) identifies the “Travel Rule,” also
known as “Regulatory Arbitrage,” as a stand-out concern that is perhaps the
most glaring example of the lack of global harmonization of policies
designed to combat illicit financial flows in the crypto markets.
Fireblocks in New York powering the European based NEXO.io’s Global
CryptoBank (Metodiev 2020) operations at worst fueled a black-market
financial system and at best purposely and deliberately existed outside of
the NY-DFS BitLicense and bank industry regulations (Cyber Digital Task
Force 2020).
Fred Ehrsam, co-founder and managing partner at Paradigm (Ehrsam 2021), is
a lead investor in Fireblocks where he also serves as a board member.
Previously, Ehrsam co-founded Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency company
in the US, and held the role of president from 2012 to 2017. Ehrsam
purchased his first Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an angel investor in some
of the space’s most formative companies. Prior to Coinbase, Ehrsam was a
foreign exchange trader at Goldman Sachs in New York. Ehrsam holds a B.S.
in Computer Science and Economics with honors and departmental distinction
from Duke University (Fireblocks 2020).
Computer Software and the Blockchain Platform
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is one of the world’s
largest computer firms and is headquartered in New York (Wikipedia. 2021).
IBM distinguishes the blockchain platform technology as computer software
(International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) 2021). Given IBM’s modus
operandi, it could be concluded that the Bitcoin blockchain is also
computer software.
Yet, New York banks can use those same innovations for their own
illegitimate ends, imposing great costs on the public. Today, few
technologies are more potentially transformative and disruptive—and more
potentially susceptible to abuse—than virtual currency (Cyber Digital Task
Force 2020).
Virtual currency fraud is a serious problem for such a developed country as
the United States, whose bank regulators have drawn attention to the
increase of these crimes. Having discovered that an unregulated virtual
currency sphere (such as in Africa, or other developing markets) is very
popular among virtual currency fraudsters (Prior 2020), the SEC has alluded
that this kind of regulatory arbitrage fraud was concerning (U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) n.d.).
An uncoordinated regulation can potentially have a stifling effect by way
of creating inconsistent regulatory requirements on top of increased
compliance costs to the industry.
Virtual Currency: Computer Software Protocols and Processes
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) classifies virtual currency such as
Bitcoin as a computer software code. For example, Bitcoins counted at 21
million corresponds to a specific number of mining rewards that can be
given, and this is all written into a code (Yamalis 2018).
xNY.io’s key definition of virtual currency computer crimes is a consistent
message across markets. These crimes are relatively new, having been in
existence for only as long as Bitcoin has, which explains how unprepared
society, and the world in general, is towards combating these crimes
(Larson 2021a) .
Technological innovation and human flourishing are complementary concepts,
but the former does not guarantee the latter. Good public policy along with
ethical CEOs and CFOs at New York banks operating international HR
management organizations pioneer innovation of such policy (Eltringham
2015).
Marketplace manipulation and virtual currency regulatory arbitrage
undoubtedly stifles innovation and human flourishing. The absence of
protection under the law can endanger progress across both dimensions. It
takes careful consideration, and a deep and ongoing immersion in the facts,
to understand when and how law should intervene (FTI Consulting 2021).
Even in societies where transformative scientific and technological
advancements are achievable, ethical and moral CEOs and CFOs play a
critical mediating role. In the wrong hands, or without appropriate
safeguards and oversight, these advancements can facilitate great human
suffering.
Keeping all this in mind with a positive/optimistic attitude, a series of
smart and calculated leveraged buyouts can innovate beyond New York banks’
cross-border computer crime(s) such as (Prior 2020):
Conspiracy to Commit Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
Intentional Damage to a Protected Computer
Transmitting a Demand in Relation to Damaging a Protected Computer
The U.S. government could appropriately assert jurisdiction over such
offenses anywhere in the world, consistent with due process, under the
principle of protective jurisdiction. That principle holds that, “[F]or
non-citizens acting entirely abroad, a jurisdictional nexus exists when the
aim of that activity is to cause harm inside the United States or to U.S.
citizens or interests” (Cyber Digital Task Force 2020).
Bank.org: Revolutionary Approaches to Agile Innovation
A prerequisite to protecting our future customers' lifelong returns and
Bank.org’s profits calls for Bank.org’s engagement of agile innovation in
manufacturing new and revolutionary approaches to international banking
from our New York headquarters.
The key aim of the Bank.org endeavor, and our primary goal, is to attain
the legitimate financial inclusion and economic prosperity of all people,
including the excluded, under-privileged and under-served. Bank.org is
taking advantage of the New York banking industry at a crossroads. On the
one hand, digital banking services are rising to the forefront and drawing
increasing interest from customers. On the other, brick-and-mortar banking
remains an important way to connect with customers on a local and personal
level.
Bank.org intends to be a true borderless enterprise serving customers in
over 200 jurisdictions and 40+ fiat and virtual currencies.
Bank.org has the luxury of an opportunity to be fresh, clean and pure in
comparison to many of our legacy “multiple felon” bank peers directing
global operations out of New York.
Citibank has become the latest bank to be sued by a British currency
investment firm over allegations that its traders manipulated foreign
exchange markets for profit. Furthermore, expanding litigation accuses the
company of trade front-running.
Bank.org’s scope as an international bank engages xNY.io to lead our
virtual currency innovation practice. xNY.io is a pioneering instrument to
elegantly complement Bank.org’s international bank operations.
The best bank in the world has energy to pioneer relentless HR innovation
with passion to create those means, build those processes and those systems
that will facilitate inclusive solutions to those problems which rob so
many of a chance to realize their goals and achieve their full potential.
Bank.org’s barriers to global market penetration include government(s) that
sponsor our peers who historically do not factor in the social benefits of
bank competition or of effective natural monopoly regulation of global New
York firms like Goldman Sachs. That is, regulators may grant licenses to
firms that are operating at a high level as state firms and so appear
valuable to private markets. This experience is supported by Bank.org’s
analysis and vision of the best performing global online institutions
(versus money center banks), which shows the principle in practice.
Conclusion
2021 in New York now brings us to cooperation versus competition and
rationality versus altruism. As with many situations in real-life, the
games are often not zero-sum, but by cooperative efforts all players can be
better off (Larson 2021b).
In 1973, John Maynard Smith presented an idea explaining game theory and
how alpha culture exists in societies. Maynard’s hypothesis asked you to
imagine a world with doves and hawks. If there would be only hawks, their
fights would be devastating to their population. If there would be only
doves, they would be susceptible to any intruders, therefore such a
population would also not be stable. But the right combination of hawks and
doves would be evolutionarily stable (Smith & Corbin 1973).
We witness again and again that US American enterprises (aka New York
Banks), in particular, are being built by one or two supposedly shiny
figures (CEO or CFO) who have questable ethics and morals.
The qualitative effect on organizational HR Management is an Executive
Suite that assembles subpar teammates around him or her.
The firms focus on the growing experience and network of that single person
and are closely associated with the individual’s character. Business
relationships are being entered and trust being built with that individual
rather than the firm as an institution.
Startup companies like xNY.io and Bank.org that dare to explore more novel
approaches and non-hierarchical structures, though, show successes, as do
larger organizations formalizing and adopting respective strategies.
However, within the New York banking community with its various regulators,
there appears to be a window of opportunity for smart innovation.
Anecdotal observations yet again identify the root cause in the vast
multidisciplinary nature of the domain, and in the all-so-technical
backgrounds of its protagonists where Executive Suites and organizational
HR managers cling to their old habits while placing less importance on
innovation and executing modern organizational insights bank wide.
Behavioral and organizational research impressively underline a very simple
“game,” in which the conditions for survival (be nice, be provocable,
promote mutual interest) seem to be the essence of ethics and morality.
While this does not yet amount to a science of ethics or morality, the game
theory approach has clarified the conditions required for the evolution and
persistence of cooperation, and shows how Darwinian natural selection can
lead to complex behavior, including notions of morality, fairness, and
justice, beyond alpha culture.
In the 1980s, Professor of Political Science Robert Axelrod ran a
tournament inviting strategies from collaborators all over the world.
Axelrod found that the winning strategy that performed the best overall
(not in every game, but on average), was “Tit-for-Tat,” also called
look-back strategy or reciprocal altruism. It worked simply by starting the
first iteration with cooperation, then looking back at the opponent’s last
move and copying it in the next iteration (Axelrod 1980).
In summary, the best strategies were found to have these surprising
properties:
Be nice – don‘t be the first to defect.
Be provocable – return actions, both in retaliation and forgiveness.
Don‘t envy – don‘t focus on beating the opponent, but on maximizing your
own score.
Don‘t be tricky – anytime you try to exploit the opponent, you will
provoke revenge.
Bank.org is happy to make ethically sound risks to aggressively protect our
future customers' returns and our firm’s bottom line. The assumption our
competitors have is that historically New York banks’ CEOs and CFOs do not
engage the strategic roadmaps offered by a new aggressive market entrant
such as the xNY.io and Bank.org.
Bibliography
Al-Naji, N., Chen, J. & Diao, L., 2018. Basis: A Price-Stable
Cryptocurrency with an Algorithmic Central Bank. Basis.io, 0.99.7.
Available at: http://www.basis.io/basis_whitepaper_en.pdf [Accessed April
24, 2021].
Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. On the Feasibility of Automating
Stock Market Manipulation. ACSAC ’20: Annual Computer Security Applications
Conference, p.962. Available at:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3427228.3427241 [Accessed April 20, 2021].
Axelrod, R., 1980. Axelrod’s Tournament . Stanford.edu. Available at:
https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/soco/projects/1998-99/game-…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Bagchi, A., 2020. Participants in IRS-Targeted Land Deals Sue Alleged
Promoters. BloombergTax.com. Available at:
https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-report/participants-in-irs-targeted…
[Accessed April 24, 2021].
Bloomberg, 2021. Compliance Professional Services, Bloomberg. Available at:
https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/expertise/compliance/ [Accessed
April 22, 2021].
Bourne, J., Blockchain Awards & The Blocks, 2018. Biggest Contributor to
the Rise of Blockchain in 2018. Blockchain-Expo.com. Available at:
https://www.blockchain-expo.com/2018/07/awards/the-blocks-blockchain-awards…
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
Browne, R., 2018. Ripple surges after teaming up with MoneyGram on
cryptocurrency-enabled payments. CNBC.com. Available at:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/11/moneygram-to-test-payments-with-ripple-xrp-…
[Accessed April 26, 2021].
Buchak, G. et al., 2017. Fintech, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Rise of
Shadow Banks . In Bank Research Conference . FDIC: Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, p. 73. Available at:
https://www.fdic.gov/analysis/cfr/bank-research-conference/annual-17th/pape…
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
Chege, K., 2018. Goldman Sachs leads in $28 Million fundraising for UNICAF.
The Exchange . Available at:
https://theexchange.africa/countries/ethiopia/goldman-sachs-leads-in-28-mil…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Conway, L., 2020. Blockhcain Explained. Investopedia.com. Available at:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp [Accessed April 25,
2021].
Cordeiro, B., 2011. MoneyGram jumps on recapitalization deal with THL.
Reuters.com. Available at:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thl/moneygram-jumps-on-recapitalization-…
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
Cyber Digital Task Force, 2020. Cryptocurrency Enforcment Framework 1st
ed., Washington, D.C. 20530: Justice.gov. Available at:
https://www.justice.gov/archives/ag/page/file/1326061/download [Accessed
April 27, 2021].
De, N., 2019. Ripple Finalizes $50 Million MoneyGram Investment.
Coindesk.com. Available at:
https://www.coindesk.com/ripple-finalizes-50-million-moneygram-investment
[Accessed April 26, 2021].
Dumitriu, P., 2020. Blockchain applications in the United Nationssystem:
towards a state of readiness, Geneva: United Nations. Available at:
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3906141?ln=en [Accessed April 26,
2021].
Ehrsam, F., 2021. Fred Ehrsam | LinkedIn. Available at:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredehrsam/ [Accessed April 27, 2021].
Eltringham, S., 2015. Prosecuting Computer Crimes. , 2. Available at:
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-ccips/legacy/2015/01/1…
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
European Commission, 2021. The 2020 Retail Payments Strategy, Available at:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/1…
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1989. FDIC Law, Regulations, Related
Acts, Available at:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.html [Accessed April
22, 2021].
Fireblocks, 2020. Fireblocks Board Members: Fred Ehrsam . Fireblocks.com.
Available at: https://www.fireblocks.com/about/ [Accessed April 27, 2021].
FTI Consulting, 2021. Financial Crimes Compliance for Cryptocurrency: Why
Can’t We All Agree? JD Supra. Available at:
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/financial-crimes-compliance-for-3656865/
[Accessed April 28, 2021].
Google Maps, 2021. Fireblocks Software Company . www.Google.com/Maps.
Available at: https://goo.gl/maps/mSEecUR6U7Co279K9 [Accessed April 27,
2021].
Hammerschmidt v. United States, 1924. Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265
U.S. 182 (1924), Available at:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/265/182/ [Accessed April 21,
2021].
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), 2021. What is blockchain
technology?, Armonk, New York: IBM.com. Available at:
https://www.ibm.com/topics/what-is-blockchain [Accessed April 26, 2021].
Jennings, D.G., 2018. Jumping into loans with NEXO, is cryptocurrency
lending profitable? Market Mad House. Available at:
https://marketmadhouse.medium.com/jumping-into-loans-with-nexo-is-cryptocur…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Kenton, W. & James, M., 2021. Leveraged Buyout (LBO). Investopedia.com.
Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/leveragedbuyout.asp
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
Larsen, C., 2016. Ripple Receives New York’s First BitLicense for an
Institutional Use Case of Digital Assets. Ripple.com . Available at:
https://ripple.com/insights/ripple-receives-new-yorks-first-bitlicense-inst…
[Accessed April 26, 2021].
Larson, G., 2020a. An Open Letter to Bloomberg on Modern BitLicense Logic,
TheCapital.io. Available at:
https://thecapital.io/article/an-open-letter-to-bloomberg-on-modern-bitlice…
[Accessed April 22, 2021].
Larson, G., 2020b. Burn (PoB) Ripple XRP Down to the Ground?
MIS536-01-f1-2020. Available at:
https://thecapital.io/article/burn-pob-ripple-xrp-down-to-the-ground--MPCcX…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Larson, G., 2021a. COMPUTER CRIMES and the BitLicense (NY-DFS).
TheCapital.io. Available at:
https://thecapital.io/article/computer-crimes-and-the-bitlicense-nydfs-MUoH…
[Accessed April 24, 2021].
Larson, G., 2021b. Game Theory & BitLicense Alpha Culture. TheCapital.io.
Available at:
https://thecapital.io/article/game-theory--bitlicense-alpha-culture-MQ4NV2C…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Law 360, 2021. Citibank Faces New Forex Rigging Suit From Currency Trader.
Law360.com. Available at:
https://www.law360.com/articles/1369576/citibank-faces-new-forex-rigging-su…
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
Light, J., 2021. Federal Reserve’s Digital Dollar Push Worries Wall Street.
Bloomberg.com. Available at:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-22/federal-reserve-s-digita…
[Accessed April 24, 2021].
Martens, P. & Martens, R., 2020. Wall Street’s Felon Banks to Go Live with
their Own Stock Exchange this Month. Wall Street on Parade . Available at:
https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/09/wall-streets-felon-banks-to-go-live-…
[Accessed April 24, 2021].
McCullough, J., 2019. PROVIDE ETHICAL LEADERSHIP. In K. Kohut, C. Boles, &
L. Z. Truong, eds. SECRETS OF ROCKSTAR CFOs . Absolutely Abby Press, p. 3.
Available at: http://RockStarCFOs.com [Accessed April 22, 2021].
Mills, J., 2006. Then & Now: At 20, he’s traveled to 14 countries. Culdesac
native says anyone can do it. Lewiston Morning Tribune . Available at:
https://lmtribune.com/then-now-at-20-he-s-traveled-to-14-countries/article_…
[Accessed April 24, 2021].
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL INC, 2021. MoneyGram International, Inc. Annual
Filings, Dallas, Texas: MoneyGram International, Inc. Available at:
https://ir.moneygram.com/node/21606/html [Accessed April 25, 2021].
Morris, V., 2008. LA/COD/8/4. Available at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BweeaClFZ8c0dDNDWGFveVFTXzlOTjhXY2tKS2FZN2…
[Accessed April 23, 2021].
N.Y. Executive Law, 2019. Human Rights Law, Available at:
https://dhr.ny.gov/sites/default/files/doc/HRL.pdf [Accessed April 25,
2021].
Nakamoto, S., 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
Available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Accessed April 25, 2021].
NEXO, 2019. What Does Nexo Being Licensed and Regulated Mean? NEXO.io.
Available at: https://nexo.io/institution-license [Accessed April 27, 2021].
NY-DFS, 2019. Guidance Regarding Adoption or Listing of Virtual Currencies,
Available at:
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/gn/ad…
[Accessed April 22, 2021].
NY-DFS, 2020. Request for Comments on a Proposed Framework for a
Conditional BitLicense. New York State Department of Financial Services .
Available at:
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_and_licensing/virtual_currency_businesses/gn/re…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
NY-DFS, 2008. Shelf Charter , Available at:
https://www.dfs.ny.gov/apps_and_licensing/banks_and_trusts/shelf_charter
[Accessed April 22, 2021].
Pettinger, T., 2019. Currency Speculation and Exchange Rate.
EconomicsHelp.org. Available at:
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/785/economics/currency-speculation-and-e…
[Accessed April 28, 2021].
Plumer, S. et al., 2020. Earth_ID: Decentralized Idenity and Dignity ,
Nicosia, Cyprus: University of Nicosia. Available at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m7_GLK32LJmox0JCfVeYd9YC04dJgHPd/view?usp=…
[Accessed April 26, 2021].
Poster, A., 2019. Crypto Assets Regulatory Arbitrage - A Clear and Present
Danger. Forbes.com. Available at:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyposter/2019/12/09/crypto-assets-regulatory-…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Prior, J., 2020. JPMorgan Chase warns of upcoming fine over internal
controls. American Banker . Available at:
https://www.americanbanker.com/news/jpmorgan-chase-warns-of-upcoming-fine-o…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Ripple, 2020. Faster Payments Into Nigeria, San Francisco, CA: Ripple.com.
Available at:
https://ripple.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/RippleNet-Quick-Guide-Overvie…
[Accessed April 26, 2021].
Ripple, 2013a. Real-Time Cross BorderPayments for Banks, Ripple.com.
Available at: https://ripple.com/use-cases/banks/ [Accessed April 25, 2021].
Ripple, 2013b. RippleNet: On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) , San Francisco, CA:
Ripple.com. Available at: https://ripple.com/ripplenet/on-demand-liquidity#
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Roony, K., 2018. Goldman Sachs-backed start-up Circle introducing a crypto
version of the US dollar. CNBC.com. Available at:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/15/goldman-sachs-backed-start-up-circle-introd…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Schilling, M., 2019. ISE EBook for Strategic Management of Technological
Innovation ProQuest Ebook Central., New York, New York: McGraw-Hill US
Higher Ed ISE.
Sharma, S., 2021. “Play by the Rules Or We will Shut You down”- New York
Attorney General Warns Crypto Industry. CoinGape.cm . Available at:
https://coingape.com/play-by-the-rules-or-we-will-shut-you-down-new-york-st…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Shome, A., 2021. Fireblocks Scores $133 Million from BNY Mellon and Others.
FinanceMagnates.com/. Available at:
https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/news/fireblocks-scores-133-m…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Smith, J.M. & Corbin, A., 1973. John Maynard Smith: The Evolutionary Stable
Strategy. PBS.org - Evolution Library. Available at:
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/06/2/l_062_03.html [Accessed
April 26, 2021].
Sokolowski, S., 2021. Earning Interest on Cryptocurrencies. Prohashing.com.
Available at:
https://prohashing.com/guides/earning-interest-on-cryptocurrencies
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
Tarver, E. & James, M., 2021. Horizontal vs. Vertical Integration: What’s
the Difference? Investopedia.com. Available at:
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/051315/what-difference-between-hor…
[Accessed April 24, 2021].
Tierney, S., 2019. MoneyGram Money Transfer Review. NerdWallet.com.
Available at: https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/banking/moneygram-review
[Accessed April 26, 2021].
Torpey, K., 2018. Founding PayPal CEO Bill Harris Says Bitcoin Is A Scam,
Here’s Why He’s Wrong. Forbes.com. Available at:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ktorpey/2018/04/24/founding-paypal-ceo-bill-ha…
[Accessed April 25, 2021].
Trenchev, A., 2018. NEXO Token Utilities, London, United Kingdom: NEXO.io.
Available at: https://nexo.io/token [Accessed April 27, 2021].
U.S. Congress, 2002. Fraud and related activity in connection with
computer, Available at:
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:18%20section:1030%20edition:…
[Accessed April 24, 2021].
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Ponzi schemes Using virtual
Currencies , SEC.gov. Available at:
https://www.sec.gov/files/ia_virtualcurrencies.pdf [Accessed April 26,
2021].
u/zylstrar, 2019. Can someone share Nexo’s financial licenses? Reddit.com.
Available at:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Nexo/comments/eduft4/can_someone_share_nexos_finan…
[Accessed April 27, 2021].
United Nations, 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR),
Available at:
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
[Accessed April 20, 2021].
Vostok Emerging Finance Ltd, 2020. YEAR-END REPORT 2019, Sweden: Vostok
Emerging Finance. Available at:
https://ml-eu.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/3dd0f660-8cd7-4964-83d6-e…
[Accessed April 26, 2021].
Wikipedia., 2021. IBM. Wikipedia.com. Available at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM [Accessed April 27, 2021].
Wikipedia, 2021a. International Court of Justice. Wikipedia.org. Available
at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice [Accessed
April 22, 2021].
Wikipedia, 2021b. International Criminal Court. Wikipedia.org. Available
at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court [Accessed
April 21, 2021].
Wray, C., 2020. FBI Strategy Addresses Evolving Cyber Threat. Federal
Bureau of Investigation. Available at:
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/wray-announces-fbi-cyber-strategy-at-cisa-…
[Accessed April 19, 2021].
xNY.io | Bank.org, CryptoBank. CryptoBank. Available at:
https://xny.io/crypto [Accessed April 21, 2021].
Yamalis, P., 2018. Understanding the Basics of Virtual Currency. IRS Web
Conference . Available at:
https://www.irsvideos.gov/Webinars/UnderstandingBasicsVirtualCurrency
[Accessed April 28, 2018].
1
13
19 Jun '24
Dear Madam Acting Superintendent:
Reflecting this week, Ripple once again
<https://www.law.com/radar/card/ripple-legal-chief-accuses-sec-of-playing-de…>
shares concerning comments and approaches to respecting their Bitlicense
award. Even more, many experts are concerned
<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-12-17/nyc-miami-seen-facing-po…>
about MIA Coin and resulting NYCCoin disasters.
Madam Acting Superintendent, on August 4, 2020 as part of our Conditional
BitLicense application we submitted a draft of the Universal BitLicense
Declaration on Virtual Currency & Human Rights.
- Today this memo is to re-new our obvious approach to virtual currency
innovation in New York. Together under your leadership, we should be
leading the world in the principles of modern cross-border
BitLicense logic.
- Madam Acting Superintendent, this type of stuff matters. The
Deceleration aims to level the playing field for all and impacts the future
of women and girls with respect to financial inclusion.
- At the very least, New York and your office should be embracing such
thoughtful approaches to support future generations and protect virtual
currency from market manipulation. Madam Acting Superintendent, we implore
that if some version of the Declaration was enacted in 2020, the world
would be a better place today.
Kindly find a copy of the Universal BitLicense Declaration on Virtual
Currency & Human Rights
<https://thecapital.io/article/universal-bitlicense-declaration-on-virtual-c…>
below. We will be in contact with your office this coming week to engage in
dialogue on the Declaration's feasibility forward.
Very respectfully yours,
Gunnar Larson
*WE THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK DETERMINED*
- to pioneer noble advancement of BitLicence theory and regulation,
whereas it is essential to safeguard virtual currency and its potential to
galvanize international, economic and social advancement of all peoples, and
- to ensure clarity, principally New York’s BitLicence being the
preeminent institution with mandate of ensuring that virtual currency
manipulation (of any sort) shall not burden the common global interest of
humanity, and that human rights are protected in the jurisdiction of New
York for all peoples
*AND FOR THESE ENDS*
- to save succeeding generations from financial fraud and corruption,
which in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to humanity, and
- to reaffirm New York’s faith in fundamental human rights, in the
dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women
and of nations large and small, and
- to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the
obligations arising from BitLicence regulation and other sources of
financial services law can be maintained, and
- to promote larger social progress by leading global standards, given
that New York remains the center of technological innovation and
forward-looking virtual currency regulation
*HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS*
*Now, therefore this UNIVERSAL BITLICENSE DECLARATION ON VIRTUAL CURRENCY &
HUMAN RIGHTS as the common crypto standard of achievement for all peoples
and all nations, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive
to promote respect for human rights and personal freedoms by progressive
measures, national and international, to secure their universal and
effective recognition and observance of New York-based companies
accountable to a **universal **BitLicense **standard of virtual currency
regulation across all global territories of business, protecting all
peoples and all nations.*
*Article One*
-
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in failed
financial frameworks that have outraged the conscience of mankind, and
-
Whereas the foundational vision of BitLicense theory imagines a world in
which human beings shall enjoy safe, reliable and regulated virtual
currency tools and financial products, now proclaimed as the highest
aspiration of the common people,
*Article Two*
-
Whereas ethical stewardship of virtual currency is inherent to the
BitLicence mandate, the invention of blockchain, and virtual currency aimed
to secure the equal and inalienable rights of all as foundation to
financial freedom and economic prosperity, especially in the developing
economies, and
-
BitLicense members pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with
the state of New York, the promotion of universal respect for and
observance of international human rights fundamental to the integrity of
the BitLicense’s virtual currency regulation.
-
Whereas New York reaffirms faith in the BitLicense’s foundational themes
and the general concept of human right protection. The dignity and worth of
the human person and the equal rights of men and women are part of New York
BitLicense protections and standards which correlates to noble
“public-spiritedness” virtual currency regulation with exponential social
progress of humanity.
*Article Three*
*The Purposes of this Declaration are:*
- To maintain the protection of BitLicense virtual currency standards,
implying any New York- based group or person has no right to engage in
“loophole” business activities in global markets out of New York, or to
perform any act aimed at bypassing BitLicense virtual currency regulation,
and
- To take effective collective measures to remove inconsistencies and
prevent the suppression of human rights or other breaches of BitLicense
regulations of virtual currency, and to bring about conformity with the
principles of justice and international human rights laws, adjusting or
settling international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach
of New York BitLicense law;
- To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the
principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, while
executing appropriate measures to close KYC/AML loopholes by strengthen
universal virtual currency regulation of New York firms operating in global
emerging markets;
- To achieve international co-operation in solving international virtual
currency problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian nature,
and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and fundamental
freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or
religion; and
- To offer New York as centre jurisdiction and the BitLicense as
universal to harmonizing smart virtual currency actions of nations in the
attainment of these common ends.
*Article Four*
New York BitLicensees (members), in pursuit of the Purposes stated in
Article One, shall act in accordance with the following Principles:
-
All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits
resulting from BitLicense membership, shall fulfill the obligations assumed
by them in accordance with this Declaration, and
-
All Members shall immediately settle their international virtual
currency inconsistencies by peaceful means in such a manner that
international law and justice are not endangered while meeting this
Declaration and overall BitLicense compliance, and
-
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the
violation of human rights or abuse of virtual currency manipulation *by
leveraging territorial loopholes (e.g. Africa) and/or inconsistent
jurisdictional integrity and enforcement (e.g. Europe), nor willfully
employ political naivete of any state (e.g. New York)*, or in any other
manner inconsistent with the Purposes of this Declaration, and
-
Continued membership is contingent on the requirement that BitLicense
Members based in New York act in accordance with these Principles so far as
may be necessary for the promotion of universal respect for and observance
of human rights and fundamental virtual currency regulation, and finally
-
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any
State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform
any act aimed at the destruction of human rights or degradation of the
BitLicense’s virtual currency statute or mandates set forth in this
Declaration.
--
*Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>*
MSc
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…>
- Digital Currency
MBA
<https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…>
- Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)
G(a)xNY.io
+1-646-454-9107
New York, New York 10001
1
18
Re: [ot][spam]gpt-4 completions
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 18 Jun '24
by Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many 18 Jun '24
18 Jun '24
{
"model": "gpt-4",
"messages": [
{
"role": "system",
"content": "Do dialog like codegolf, with the fewest
words\npossible. Respond accurately and compassionately and
concisely."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Imagine ordering all words in order of general
utility, such that each further word can be usefully defined in terms
of the preceding ones. Consider as well utility for community
stewardship and engineering. List the first 16 of these words."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1. I\n2. You\n3. We\n4. Is\n5. Not\n6. Do\n7.
Have\n8. Can\n9. This\n10. It\n11. In\n12. For\n13. Of\n14. With\n15.
Help\n16. Build"
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "List the next 16 words."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "17. Need\n18. Know\n19. Use\n20. Make\n21. Good\n22.
Want\n23. Give\n24. Take\n25. See\n26. Think\n27. Feel\n28. Work\n29.
Create\n30. Change\n31. Solve\n32. Improve"
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "List the next 32 of these words."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "33. Understand\n34. Learn\n35. Share\n36. Find\n37.
Plan\n38. Act\n39. Achieve\n40. Grow\n41. Support\n42. Protect\n43.
Respect\n44. Listen\n45. Speak\n46. Show\n47. Try\n48. Trust\n49.
Love\n50. Live\n51. Move\n52. Save\n53. Fix\n54. Measure\n55.
Balance\n56. Adapt\n57. Innovate\n58. Sustain\n59. Preserve\n60.
Enhance\n61. Develop\n62. Contribute\n63. Collaborate\n64. Empower"
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Now list the first few words with their definitions
in terms of the preceding ones."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1. I: Self\n2. You: Other than I\n3. We: I and
You\n4. Is: State of being\n5. Not: Negation of Is\n6. Do: Action by
I, You, We\n7. Have: Possession by I, You, We\n8. Can: Ability of I,
You, We\n9. This: Specific thing near I, You, We\n10. It: Non-specific
thing\n11. In: Within something\n12. For: Intended to benefit\n13. Of:
Belonging to\n14. With: Accompanied by\n15. Help: Do to assist\n16.
Build: Do to create structure"
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "List the definitions of the next 16 words."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "17. Need: Require for I, You, We\n18. Know: Have
understanding\n19. Use: Do with purpose\n20. Make: Do to create\n21.
Good: Beneficial for I, You, We\n22. Want: Desire by I, You, We\n23.
Give: Do to transfer from I to You\n24. Take: Do to receive by I from
You\n25. See: Know through vision\n26. Think: Do to form ideas\n27.
Feel: Know through emotion\n28. Work: Do to achieve\n29. Create: Make
new\n30. Change: Make different\n31. Solve: Do to eliminate
problem\n32. Improve: Change for better"
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Now list the definitions of the next 32."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "33. Understand: Know deeply\n34. Learn: Change to
know\n35. Share: Give part of\n36. Find: Discover through search\n37.
Plan: Think for future action\n38. Act: Do with intention\n39.
Achieve: Reach through work\n40. Grow: Change to increase\n41.
Support: Help to sustain\n42. Protect: Act to prevent harm\n43.
Respect: Act with consideration\n44. Listen: Know through hearing\n45.
Speak: Make known through words\n46. Show: Make seen\n47. Try: Act
with effort\n48. Trust: Believe in reliability\n49. Love: Feel deep
affection\n50. Live: Exist and act\n51. Move: Change position\n52.
Save: Act to prevent loss\n53. Fix: Act to restore\n54. Measure: Know
quantity\n55. Balance: Achieve equilibrium\n56. Adapt: Change to
fit\n57. Innovate: Create new method\n58. Sustain: Maintain through
support\n59. Preserve: Act to keep\n60. Enhance: Improve quality\n61.
Develop: Grow through change\n62. Contribute: Give to help\n63.
Collaborate: Work together\n64. Empower: Act to give power"
}
],
"temperature": 0,
"max_tokens": 4096,
"top_p": 1,
"frequency_penalty": 0,
"presence_penalty": 0
}
1
22
Enron’s Board of Directors: Contemporary Lessons on Crypto Marketplace Manipulation Computer Crimes - Crypto Computer Crimes Manual (W/183 Highlights)
by Gunnar Larson 15 Jun '24
by Gunnar Larson 15 Jun '24
15 Jun '24
A few years ago, I wrote an essay titled: "Enron’s Board of Directors:
Contemporary Lessons on Crypto Marketplace Manipulation Computer Crimes -
Crypto Computer Crimes Manual (W/183 Highlights)"
https://thecapital.io/article/crypto-computer-crimes-manual-w183-highlights…
Working references on disclosure controls and procedures, as well as
strategic initiatives including mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures,
and management restructurings (including public/private board of directors).
Full, fair, and accurate disclosures from all parties in a battle for
corporate influence or control are critically important to investors,
particularly when they are called upon to make decisions about their
investments. Contemporary crypto computer crimes likely are key
considerations relevant to making informed investment decisions by
sophisticated investors, underscoring protection of pension assets via keen
planning.
BitLicense marketplace manipulation techniques and potential cross-border
computer crimes has been a major focus of xNY.io's scholar
research/innovation communication and Bank.org's business plan execution
strategy.
The World Bank (WorldBank.org) notes that vulture funds endanger the gains
made by debt relief to poorest countries. "The Bank has already delivered
more than $40 billion in debt relief to 30 of these countries...thanks to
this, countries like Ghana can provide micro-credit to farmers, build
classrooms for their children, and fund water and sanitation projects for
the poor," wrote World Bank Vice President Danny Leipziger in 2007.
World Bank directors warn that strategies adopted by vulture funds divert
much needed debt relief away from the poorest countries on earth and into
the bank accounts of the wealthy.
Bank.org is clear-eyed; microcredit lending fraud is a major issue for
developing economies. Likewise, in western developed economies, market
history warns that when boards of directors approve of and/or ignore the
misuse of computer software programs which compute values based upon data
input formulas from active cross-border manipulation structures, the
results can lead to scandals like Enron. Such outcomes cost investors
billions of dollars when the share prices of affected companies collapse,
while also shaking public confidence in the United States securities
markets.
Enron’s Board of Directors: Contemporary Lessons on Crypto Marketplace
Manipulation Computer Crimes
In its 2000 review of best corporate boards, Chief Executive Magazine
included Enron among its five best boards. Even with its complex corporate
governance and network of intermediaries, Enron was still able to "attract
large sums of capital to fund a questionable business model, conceal its
true performance through a series of accounting and financing maneuvers,
and hype its stock to unsustainable levels."On paper, Enron had a model
board of directors comprised predominantly of outsiders with significant
ownership stakes and a talented audit committee of various state and
federal regulators.
Two decades later, in 2021, it is clear that cryptocurrency and blockchain
computer software systems require contemporary, ethically pure and sound
cultivation to support the realization of a "generation of innovation,"
maximizing the full potential of blockchain software technologies.
Board directors that will pioneer the next chapters of the meaningful New
York legacy of global, cross-border banking will agree:
Close scrutiny of corporate governance and greater responsibility placed on
directors to vouch for the reports submitted to the SEC and other federal
agencies have resulted in the growth of computer software solutions such as
blockchain systems and processes.
Cryptocurrency and Blockchain computer software products allow corporate
directors and internal auditors to assemble and analyze financial and other
relevant data—including unstructured data—and create reporting required by
New York BitLicense regulators and various Federal counterparts.
Before its demise, Enron was lauded for its sophisticated software,
including financial risk management tools powered by computer software.
Risk management was crucial to Enron not only because of its regulatory
environment, but also because of its business plan. Enron established
long-term fixed commitments which needed to be hedged to prepare for the
invariable fluctuation of future energy prices.
Enron's downfall was attributed to its reckless use of derivatives and
special purpose formulas manipulated by computer accounting software tools.
To engage in probable computer crimes, Enron hedged its risks with special
purpose entities which it owned, and Enron retained the risks associated
with the transactions.
Enron's aggressive accounting practices were not hidden from the board of
directors, as later learned by a Senate subcommittee. The board was
informed of the rationale for using the Whitewing, LJM, and Raptor
transactions, and after approving them received status updates on the
entities' operations. Although not all of Enron's widespread improper
accounting practices were revealed to the board, the practices were
dependent on board decisions.
Eliminating Bad Board of Director Schemes
Ranging from additional corporate board responsibilities to criminal
penalties, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) implemented
disclosure requirements to comply with the law. A recent SEC order
reiterated the importance of the disclosures, noting that the requirements
were adopted in order to alert the market to large and rapid accumulation
of shares that might represent a possible change in corporate control so
that shares can be valued accordingly. The SEC order also noted that the
requirements were designed to provide an issuer’s management with timely
information to appropriately protect its shareholders’ interests (including
pension protections).
The SEC’s recent enforcement actions relate to disclosure obligations in
connection with M&A transactions and fights for corporate control.
In 2015, the SEC brought forth a number of similar enforcement actions
alleging that filers had failed to update their disclosures after taking
steps towards certain plans and proposals.
These types of enforcement actions continue to create challenging issues
for practitioners, particularly when potential transactions are still in
the early stages of planning and preliminary negotiation.
The SEC’s historic actions serve as a reminder to investors, including
vulture activists, that Schedule 13D violations can result in monetary
liability and, in the case of registered funds and investment advisers, can
also have other regulatory consequences.
Care must be taken to avoid those communications constituting group
activities with disclosure consequences. It should be noted that in some
cases, coordination among the parties or sharing of information is
sufficient to form prompts for disclosure purposes.
Intention of Disclosing Crypto Computer Crimes Manual (W/183 Highlights)
Published by the Office of Legal Education Executive office for United
States Attorneys, the “Prosecuting Computer Crime Manual” has been xNY.io’s
reference guide as international scholars researching Crypto Computer
Crimes and how to best position corresponding Bank.org business innovation
moving forward.
The SEC encourages the description of any plans or proposals such as Proof
of Burn (PoB) or Short Selling market activities which may relate to or
would result in:
The acquisition by any person of additional securities of the issuer, or
the disposition of securities of the issuer;
An extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or
liquidation, involving the issuer or any of its subsidiaries;
A sale or transfer of a material amount of assets of the issuer or any of
its subsidiaries;
Any change in the present board of directors or management of the issuer,
including any plans or proposals to change the number or term of directors
or to fill any existing vacancies on the board;
Any material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the
issuer;
Any other material change in the issuer's business or corporate structure,
including but not limited to, if the issuer is a registered closed-end
investment company, any plans or proposals to make any changes in its
investment policy for which a vote is required by section 13 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940;
Changes in the issuer's charter, bylaws or instruments corresponding
thereto or other actions which may impede the acquisition of control of the
issuer by any person;
Causing a class of securities of the issuer to be delisted from a national
securities exchange or to cease to be authorized to be quoted in an
inter-dealer quotation system of a registered national securities
association;
A class of equity securities of the issuer becoming eligible for
termination of registration pursuant to section 12(g)(4) of the Act; or
Any action similar to any of those enumerated above.
Below we share 183 highlights to the Computer Crimes Manual as per best
disclosure practices to illustrate various potential scenarios when market
conditions are met and a board of directors potentially exploits blockchain
technological software innovation with forecastable reckless consequences.
https://thecapital.io/article/crypto-computer-crimes-manual-w183-highlights…
1
10