February 2022 - cypherpunks - lists.cpunks.org

Re: Wicked Leaks and Belarus - a sordid history
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Like I said Doogie - TSTBAALAA - you can suck my dick tho.

1 0

Re: Get a grip, Doug
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

By paying a minimal amount of attention over the years I know about anarchists in Belarus. You sound absolutely TSTBAALAA ( Too stupid to be an activist let alone anarchist ) And my nom-de-guerre is derived from " Doctor Rat " ( Kotzwinkle ) Fuck you very much.

1 0

Wicked Leaks and Belarus - a sordid history
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

For once in their miserable life, REASON actually justified its pathetic existence! https://reason.com/2011/02/03/julian-assange-and-israel-sham/ Shame that moron, Jeremy Hammond, wasn't paying attention.

2 1

Re: Get a grip, Doug
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Doug sez we don't deserve plain speech - I disagree violently. Its cryptoanarchy, not quantum-fucking-gravity. Oh, and BTW - to repeat for the DEAF and fucking DUMB - Reposts are not endorsements. This means they're supplied ' as is " Take it or leave it. Cypherpunks write plain prose.

2 1

Calls to brick all Russian iPhones
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

vmyths - 3m You could start by bricking every iPhone purchased in Russia that’s now in Ukraine Quote Tweet Tim Cook @tim_cook · 3h I am deeply concerned with the situation in Ukraine. We’re doing all we can for our teams there and will be supporting local humanitarian efforts. I am thinking of the people who are right now in harm’s way and joining all those calling for peace.

2 1

Threatpost: Samsung Screwed Up Encryption on 100M Phones
by jim bell 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Threatpost: Samsung Screwed Up Encryption on 100M Phones. https://threatpost.com/samsung-shattered-encryption-on-100m-phones/178606/ One cryptography expert said that ‘serious flaws’ in the way Samsung phones encrypt sensitive material, as revealed by academics, are ’embarrassingly bad.’ Samsung shipped an estimated 100 million smartphones with botched encryption, including models ranging from the 2017 Galaxy S8 on up to last year’s Galaxy S21. Researchers at Tel Aviv University found what they called “severe” cryptographic design flaws that could have let attackers siphon the devices’ hardware-based cryptographic keys: keys that unlock the treasure trove of security-critical data that’s found in smartphones. What’s more, cyber attackers could even exploit Samsung’s cryptographic missteps – since addressed in multiple CVEs – to downgrade a device’s security protocols. That would set up a phone to be vulnerable to future attacks: a practice known as IV (initialization vector) reuse attacks. IV reuse attacks screw with the encryption randomization that ensures that even if multiple messages with identical plaintext are encrypted, the generated corresponding ciphertexts will each be distinct.

1 0

John Young - architect of garbage
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

No one disputing JYA published a racist letter calling for the deaths of ' 20 million mud-people ' then? No one disputing he appeared more than once on Alex Jones execrable YouTube abomination? That he's a self-described Marxist? All public knowledge - all out in the open ( OSINT ) No one defending this patent, piece-of-shit architect for Rupert Murdoch? Speak plainly. Speak freely. He was a longtime cypherpunk once.

1 0

Get a grip, Doug
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

" . . . Thank you for this post, prof if not the others (Roark would be a more interesting architect at which to diatribe). ..." I deny any diatribe against JYA - I laid out some pertinent public facts on that perp. That's all. We report - you decide. If Roark is a fictional character by that Zeynep-Ahole-style lunatic, Ayn Rand, then he self-destructs himself. GIGO. All advice is bad - good advice is fatal ( Oscar Wilde ) " . . . Anyway, unrelated matters aside, being unrelated as they are, could you please explain more of this post/domain's provenance? I am much against Putin in this matter (and Luka-needs-to-be-shanked'-o) but ya know I'm completely unfamiliar with pramen.io (looks akin to Ramen noodles, ioerror, etc.) so I was wondering if you could do a professorial monologue thing that at least for the most part sticks to the topic of this URL's provenance, thanks again, flattery, etc. I can ghostwrite for money an essay in the blue book during the finals or whatever, o profound . . ." You sound as loopy as Karl Semich. Get help. Also for other morons on this list - REPOSTS are NOT ENDORSEMENTS! Jesus Fucking Christie

2 1

Anarchists of Belarus statement
by professor rat 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

February 21, 2022 https://pramen.io/en/2022/02/soldier-the-enemy-is-in-minsk-not-kiev/ DEATH to PUTIN ( and Lukashenko! )

2 1

Re: [External Message Added] City of Miami public records request #22-459
by Gunnar Larson 25 Feb '22

25 Feb '22

Dear City of Miami Public Records: Kindly following up with you on this request. Would it be okay to ask for the first 100 documents for research purposes? Thank you, Gunnar -- *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xny.io/> | Bank.org <http://bank.org/>* MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&u…> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovat…> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G(a)xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001 On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:18 PM PublicRecords(a)miamigov.com < support(a)nextrequest.com> wrote: > -- Attach a non-image file and/or reply ABOVE THIS LINE with a message, > and it will be sent to staff on this request. -- > City of Miami Public Records > A message was sent to you regarding record request #22-459: > > Good evening, > > Compared to the initial terms, the only term omitted was STX. In all > likelihood, this will not provide more concise search results. We will > propose new search terms soon. > > Thanks. > > View Request 22-459 <https://miami.nextrequest.com/requests/22-459> > https://miami.nextrequest.com/requests/22-459 > > POWERED BY NEXTREQUEST <https://www.nextrequest.com> > > The All in One Records Requests Platform > > *Questions about your request?* Reply to this email or sign in to contact > staff at City of Miami. > > *Technical support:* See our help page > <https://help.nextrequest.com/knowledge/requester-resources> > > A message was sent to you regarding record request #22-459: The Department of Innovation and Technology has completed the search for the above referenced Public Records Request. The search yielded 13,092 e-mails (which may include duplicate e-mails or non-responsive e-mails to the exact request). Due to the voluminous nature of these e-mails we will need to charge a special service charge for the review and possible redactions of the e-mails prior to release to ensure compliance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, as amended. Currently the rate to fulfill these requests is estimated at three (3) emails per minute. Accordingly, we estimate it will take 72.73 hours, at a rate of $39.36 to complete the review and fulfill the request. Thus, the estimated costs to produce is $2,862.78. Please be advised that *this is an estimate and the cost is subject to change*, as it may take less or more time to complete the review. Accordingly, we request a fifty (50%) percent deposit in the amount of $1,431.39. to begin review of the search results. If you wish to proceed with the request, please mail, or bring the deposit in the form of cash or check to: *City of Miami* *Attn: ACA Thomas Fossler* *444 SW 2nd Avenue, 9th Floor* *Miami, FL 33130* If remitting a check, please make it payable to the City of Miami and place PRR #22-459 on the check in the Memo line for ease of identifying your deposit. If remitting deposit in cash, please bring in an envelope with a closure and place PRR #22-459 on the front of the envelope. Upon receiving the deposit, we will begin reviewing the results yielded from the IT Search. Please note that if the deposit is not remitted within thirty (30) calendar days, the request will be considered withdrawn and closed accordingly.

1 0