Re: [cryptography] NSA Attacks on VPN, SSL, TLS, SSH, Tor
Cryptome does not pretend to provide illusory security, that is security. It is a vile, rotten, corrupt endeavor, like life. Chuckle. Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security, and not rely upon security promoters, their followers and investors who exploit dependency by fear uncertainty and doubt. Skepticism of security claims and methods is one of the purposes of these lists. Perhaps the main purpose, although it is commonplace for these lists to be used for soliciting befuddled consumers to hop aboard the gravy train. Now and then skeptcism of the security arises but is usually suppressed during times of crisis when incentive is rich to promote poor products and services. Governments, commerce, orgs, experts cooperate to foster crises under guise of opposition. This applies to all forms of security, safety, protection, defense, hygienic pharma. Still, Cryptome endorses the continuing struggle to improve citizen protection, not only as a job, career, industry, but as citizens' obligation to bear responsibility for the commonweal against its inside and outside enemies, if you will, common math against the deadly germs. One way to do that is to not oversell it, tone down the threats, reduce drumbeating, avoid hyperbole for and against, forego advertising, gang-bang hectoring, circle jerk conferencing, TEDing, prize bestowing, to quietly invent, improve, critique, test, apply, re-test often, expect to be deceived by colleagues witting or unwitting, especially by sales, politicians, authoritarians -- the persistent germs. At 02:50 AM 12/30/2014, you wrote:
john likes to be poetic as a wall - dear john please listen to the smart people and have a small bit of humility - it will make you better at your job and we need EVERYONE to step up and be better at their jobs
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:38 AM, grarpamp <<mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com>grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:20 AM, John Young <<mailto:jya@pipeline.com>jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Hash this motherfucker, said math to germ.
JYA, you, as the original publisher of various and valued datasets... the responsibility to calculate, sign, and publish said hashes rests with you alone. Please consult with any trusted parties should you need assistance in such matters. A future of archivers, disseminators, and analysts will thank you.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com>carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <<https://twitter.com/carimachet>https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
John Young <jya@pipeline.com> writes:
At 02:50 AM 12/30/2014, you wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:38 AM, grarpamp <<mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com>grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:20 AM, John Young <<mailto:jya@pipeline.com>jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Hash this motherfucker, said math to germ.
JYA, you, as the original publisher of various and valued datasets... the responsibility to calculate, sign, and publish said hashes rests with you alone.
john likes to be poetic as a wall - dear john please listen to the smart people and have a small bit of humility - it will make you better at your job and we need EVERYONE to step up and be better at their jobs
Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security ...
Advocacy of skepticism is rendered ineffective if that advocacy extends to skepticism of logic and mathematics. -- -- StealthMonger Long, random latency is part of the price of Internet anonymity. Key: mailto:stealthsuite<youknowwhatgoeshere>nym.mixmin.net?subject=send%20stealthmonger-key
you know what nietzsche said about the skeptics - stranglers of life force On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:48 PM, StealthMonger <StealthMonger@nym.mixmin.net
wrote:
John Young <jya@pipeline.com> writes:
At 02:50 AM 12/30/2014, you wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:38 AM, grarpamp <<mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com>grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:20 AM, John Young <<mailto:jya@pipeline.com>jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Hash this motherfucker, said math to germ.
JYA, you, as the original publisher of various and valued datasets... the responsibility to calculate, sign, and publish said hashes rests with you alone.
john likes to be poetic as a wall - dear john please listen to the smart people and have a small bit of humility - it will make you better at your job and we need EVERYONE to step up and be better at their jobs
Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security ...
Advocacy of skepticism is rendered ineffective if that advocacy extends to skepticism of logic and mathematics.
--
-- StealthMonger Long, random latency is part of the price of Internet anonymity.
Key: mailto:stealthsuite<youknowwhatgoeshere> nym.mixmin.net?subject=send%20stealthmonger-key
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
you know what nietzsche said about the skeptics - stranglers of life force
Scepticism is the chastity of the intellect; it is shameful to give it up too soon, or to the first comer. -- George Santayana And now that we have reached the dueling quotes stage, it is time to move on to something productive. --dan
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:17:43PM -0500, dan@geer.org wrote:
And now that we have reached the dueling quotes stage, it is time to move on to something productive.
--dan
Indeed... I am celebrating New Year's Eve, having beer, cheers :) All the best in 2015! -- [0] Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong -- Oscar Wilde [1] (mainly for atheists, just few bits late) Merry Christmas and all the best in 2015! Jesus loves atheists too ;-) -- unknown
Dnia środa, 31 grudnia 2014 19:32:54 Georgi Guninski pisze:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:17:43PM -0500, dan@geer.org wrote:
And now that we have reached the dueling quotes stage, it is time to move on to something productive.
--dan
Indeed... I am celebrating New Year's Eve, having beer, cheers :)
All the best in 2015!
Try not to commit anything to OpenSSL while you're at it. ;) -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147
Cool story bro. Anyone else who downloaded it care to share/compare hashes? If hashes differ, can then check diffs? On 30 December 2014 12:17:16 GMT+00:00, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Cryptome does not pretend to provide illusory security, that is security. It is a vile, rotten, corrupt endeavor, like life. Chuckle.
Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security, and not rely upon security promoters, their followers and investors who exploit dependency by fear uncertainty and doubt.
Skepticism of security claims and methods is one of the purposes of these lists. Perhaps the main purpose, although it is commonplace for these lists to be used for soliciting befuddled consumers to hop aboard the gravy train. Now and then skeptcism of the security arises but is usually suppressed during times of crisis when incentive is rich to promote poor products and services. Governments, commerce, orgs, experts cooperate to foster crises under guise of opposition.
This applies to all forms of security, safety, protection, defense, hygienic pharma.
Still, Cryptome endorses the continuing struggle to improve citizen protection, not only as a job, career, industry, but as citizens' obligation to bear responsibility for the commonweal against its inside and outside enemies, if you will, common math against the deadly germs.
One way to do that is to not oversell it, tone down the threats, reduce drumbeating, avoid hyperbole for and against, forego advertising, gang-bang hectoring, circle jerk conferencing, TEDing, prize bestowing, to quietly invent, improve, critique, test, apply, re-test often, expect to be deceived by colleagues witting or unwitting, especially by sales, politicians, authoritarians -- the persistent germs.
john likes to be poetic as a wall - dear john please listen to the smart people and have a small bit of humility - it will make you better at your job and we need EVERYONE to step up and be better at
At 02:50 AM 12/30/2014, you wrote: their jobs
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:38 AM, grarpamp <<mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com>grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:20 AM, John Young <<mailto:jya@pipeline.com>jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Hash this motherfucker, said math to germ.
JYA, you, as the original publisher of various and valued datasets... the responsibility to calculate, sign, and publish said hashes rests
you alone. Please consult with any trusted parties should you need assistance in such matters. A future of archivers, disseminators, and analysts will thank you.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 <mailto:carimachet@gmail.com>carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <<https://twitter.com/carimachet>https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not
with the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:17 AM, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Cryptome does not pretend to provide illusory security, that is security. It is a vile, rotten, corrupt endeavor, like life. Chuckle. Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security, and not rely [...]
All due respect to Cryptome, and points well made and taken. Yet this isn't really an effective response to the issue at hand. While we should and must be skeptical... until contrary proof exists we should be taking advantage of all means available regarding distribution integrity and even provenance and secret comms if desired. That's hard, it involves some work, and homework. Yet until such proof, it's probably better than going bare assed to the Sun.
Still, Cryptome endorses the continuing struggle to improve citizen ... common math against the deadly germs.
Indeed.
One way to do that is to not oversell it, tone down the threats, reduce
Interestingly true in some regards. Yet in the context herein, it's probably not the place to make a stand. Especially considering the stand itself is in one's very existance all so long. Is it not? Oh were there but more of this kind, be they true or not :)
dan are you the fucker that doxed me on this list? #boring seth oh yes agreed monolith is inaccurate frames but i think the security state - that has the job of protecting the system no matter what the system looks like or does - is pretty homogenous On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:22 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:17 AM, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Cryptome does not pretend to provide illusory security, that is security. It is a vile, rotten, corrupt endeavor, like life. Chuckle. Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security, and not rely [...]
All due respect to Cryptome, and points well made and taken. Yet this isn't really an effective response to the issue at hand. While we should and must be skeptical... until contrary proof exists we should be taking advantage of all means available regarding distribution integrity and even provenance and secret comms if desired. That's hard, it involves some work, and homework. Yet until such proof, it's probably better than going bare assed to the Sun.
Still, Cryptome endorses the continuing struggle to improve citizen ... common math against the deadly germs.
Indeed.
One way to do that is to not oversell it, tone down the threats, reduce
Interestingly true in some regards. Yet in the context herein, it's probably not the place to make a stand. Especially considering the stand itself is in one's very existance all so long. Is it not? Oh were there but more of this kind, be they true or not :)
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
ahhhh also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn so the government appears to be into kiddie porn - that is a big factor i would say in light of the estimation percentage and the fact that molesters in the US are rarely given heavy sentences that is when they prosecute them... On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
dan are you the fucker that doxed me on this list?
#boring
seth oh yes agreed monolith is inaccurate frames but i think the security state - that has the job of protecting the system no matter what the system looks like or does - is pretty homogenous
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:22 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:17 AM, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
Cryptome does not pretend to provide illusory security, that is security. It is a vile, rotten, corrupt endeavor, like life. Chuckle. Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security, and not rely [...]
All due respect to Cryptome, and points well made and taken. Yet this isn't really an effective response to the issue at hand. While we should and must be skeptical... until contrary proof exists we should be taking advantage of all means available regarding distribution integrity and even provenance and secret comms if desired. That's hard, it involves some work, and homework. Yet until such proof, it's probably better than going bare assed to the Sun.
Still, Cryptome endorses the continuing struggle to improve citizen ... common math against the deadly germs.
Indeed.
One way to do that is to not oversell it, tone down the threats, reduce
Interestingly true in some regards. Yet in the context herein, it's probably not the place to make a stand. Especially considering the stand itself is in one's very existance all so long. Is it not? Oh were there but more of this kind, be they true or not :)
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote: porn If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them. Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.) -- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan... On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism. "you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want" Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
the state is left to its own devices to do whatever the fuck it wants because the people are morons is the point ... freedom is over rated ... it like the word candy to children ... i prefer structures of community agreements and i can clearly state as an anarchist, that that kind of structure has nothing to do with the state plus the state has long been extra judicial so... On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism. I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx. On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism. I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx.
No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that reflects my patriarchic childhood.
On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men basically On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism. I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx.
No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that reflects my patriarchic childhood.
On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
It is of course well understood, these days, that paedophilia is exclusively the domain of white men. On 2 January 2015 17:37:33 GMT+00:00, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men basically
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of
On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote: libertarianism.
I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx.
No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that reflects my patriarchic childhood.
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie
sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up
On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote: porn then
you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want
perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote: > also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used > for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for
<demonfighter@gmail.com> them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up.
I
typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
hence the liberatarian protectionism of old fat white men doing anything they fucking want to whoever the fuck they want no matter what ... THEY ARE WHITE MEN SO... its like a syndicate - WHITE MEN UNITE !!!! KILL EVERYONES SOUL!!!! BECAUSE LIBERATARIANISM!!! On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Cathal (Phone) <cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me
wrote:
It is of course well understood, these days, that paedophilia is exclusively the domain of white men.
On 2 January 2015 17:37:33 GMT+00:00, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men basically
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism. I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx.
No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that reflects my patriarchic childhood.
On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <
demonfighter@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> > wrote: >> also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used >> for > child porn > > If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings > correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related > to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly > not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already > know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them. > > Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I > typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search > engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well > enough.) > > -- > Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209 >
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
... On 2 January 2015 17:59:48 GMT+00:00, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
hence the liberatarian protectionism of old fat white men doing anything they fucking want to whoever the fuck they want no matter what ... THEY ARE WHITE MEN SO... its like a syndicate - WHITE MEN UNITE !!!! KILL EVERYONES SOUL!!!! BECAUSE LIBERATARIANISM!!!
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Cathal (Phone) <cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me
wrote:
It is of course well understood, these days, that paedophilia is exclusively the domain of white men.
On 2 January 2015 17:37:33 GMT+00:00, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we
talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men basically
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of
I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx.
No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything
let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that reflects my patriarchic childhood.
On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
> good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting > (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie
> sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up
> you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - > perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
> > On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong < demonfighter@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used >>> for >> child porn >> >> If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings >> correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related >> to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly >> not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already >> know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for
were libertarianism. that porn then them.
>> >> Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I >> typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search >> engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well >> enough.) >> >> -- >> Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209 >> > > >
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimachet@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Dnia piątek, 2 stycznia 2015 18:59:48 Cari Machet pisze:
hence the liberatarian protectionism of old fat white men doing anything they fucking want to whoever the fuck they want no matter what ... THEY ARE WHITE MEN SO... its like a syndicate - WHITE MEN UNITE !!!! KILL EVERYONES SOUL!!!! BECAUSE LIBERATARIANISM!!!
Awww, look, what a cute little racism just here. :3 -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147
On Fri, 02 Jan 2015 08:32:16 +0000 Cathal Garvey <cathalgarvey@cathalgarvey.me> wrote:
Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism. I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched hardware, thx.
So Cathal was even more of a retard than I originally thought. Then again Cathal likes to argue against online markets for drugs in a cypherpunk mailing list, so I shouldn't be surprised.
On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100 Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want - perfect plan...
You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against 'drugs' and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime examples of statism.
"you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want"
Yeah, it's called freedom.
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used for child porn
If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well enough.)
-- Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
participants (12)
-
Cari Machet -
Cathal (Phone) -
Cathal Garvey
-
dan＠geer.org -
Georgi Guninski -
grarpamp -
John Young -
Juan -
Mirimir -
rysiek -
StealthMonger -
Steve Furlong