On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100
Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:

> good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting
> (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn
> sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then
> you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want -
> perfect plan...

        You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against
        'drugs'  and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime
        examples of statism.


        "you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you
want"

        Yeah, it's called freedom.

>
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used
> > > for
> > child porn
> >
> > If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings
> > correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related
> > to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly
> > not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already
> > know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
> >
> > Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I
> > typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search
> > engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well
> > enough.)
> >
> > --
> > Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
> >
>
>
>