that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men basically

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:

On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
> Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism.
> I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched
> hardware, thx.

No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to
have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of
libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that
let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that
reflects my patriarchic childhood.

> On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100
>> Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting
>>> (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn
>>> sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then
>>> you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want -
>>> perfect plan...
>>
>>     You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against
>>     'drugs'  and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime
>>     examples of statism.
>>
>>
>>     "you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you
>> want"
>>
>>     Yeah, it's called freedom.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used
>>>>> for
>>>> child porn
>>>>
>>>> If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings
>>>> correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related
>>>> to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly
>>>> not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already
>>>> know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I
>>>> typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search
>>>> engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well
>>>> enough.)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>