[UR-WG] OGF28 Schedule

Tue Mar 23 11:11:44 CDT 2010

Hello John:

      It's a good idea to have a UR 2.0 specification, but I won't recommend a separate storage usage record. In OGF 21, Donal and I came up with a long-term roadmap for UR 2.0 (as attached). How about come up with some storage metrics rather than another usage record template for storage. I will try to squeeze sometime for the UR core schema, which abstract common template for different types of usage records, computing, storage, service, etc. 

      PS: I've moved to university of Southampton (email: xc2 at ecs.soton.ac.uk) and got a project deadline in May. But I will try my best to input something. I also asked for replacement of my chairship. 

                Best Regards!

X. Chen
--------
LSL
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

 +44 238 0591 523

-----Original Message-----
From: ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org on behalf of john.gordon at stfc.ac.uk
Sent: Tue 23/03/2010 15:42
To: andrea.cristofori at cnaf.infn.it; ur-wg at ogf.org
Subject: Re: [UR-WG] OGF28 Schedule

Andrea, at OGF28 someone suggested that we had a choice of either
fitting the storage record into the existing UR or defining a new
standard.  I do not think that this is the case. The existing UR
UsageRecord element has a UsageRecordType type of which JobUsageRecord
is a defined type. I think we need to define a new type
StorageUsageRecord which can contain some of the existing Global
attributes defined for the JobUsageRecord. 

We could also define a FileUsageRecord to cover the case you were
defining Andrea.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Andrea Cristofori
> Sent: 23 March 2010 14:49
> To: ur-wg at ogf.org
> Subject: Re: [UR-WG] OGF28 Schedule
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> While waiting for the minute I'll suggest we can already start to
> discuss one basic topic that came up during the meeting before we move
> to more specific things.
> 
> - Since the beginning I was thinking just to add new properties to the
> existing UR definition. This would allow to choose those that are
> needed
> in each situation and reuse those that are common. In case of new
> versions of the UR definition if we update a property then is not
> needed
> to update all the definition if this is common. Not all of us agreed
> with that and it was proposed to create a different usage record for
> the
> Storage.
> What do you think?
> 
> - What would you prefer to do in case we discuss other property not
> directly connected with storage accounting? Should we include
> everything
> in the discussion now or concentrate only on this topic and try to
> finalize an update before moving to other things?
> 
> Cheers
> Andrea
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/18/2010 05:19 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> > P.S.: here is the link
> >
> > http://www.ogf.org/gf/event_schedule/?id=2029
> >
> >
> >
> > On 03/18/2010 05:15 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I have uploaded the slide I presented in Munich last Monday. As
soon
> as
> >> we check the minute of the discussion I will upload the file, we
can
> >> continue the discussion and decide how to proceed.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Andrea
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 03/10/2010 04:40 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> We have a session scheduled for Monday, March 15 from 4:00 pm to
> 5:30 pm
> >>> Location: HGB-A 016.
> >>>
> >>> Agenda:
> >>> - UR for Storage Accounting discussion
> >>> - AUR discussion
> >>> - AOB
> >>>
> >>> If you want to add or change something on the agenda please let me
> know.
> >>> I'm plannig to prepare some slide to show to the people present
> there
> >>> that can be a starting point for the discussion.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Andrea
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Andrea Cristofori
> INFN-CNAF
> Viale Berti Pichat 6/2
> 40127 Bologna
> Italy
> Tel. : +39-051-6092920
> Skype: andrea-cnaf
> 
> --
>   ur-wg mailing list
>   ur-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.
--
  ur-wg mailing list
  ur-wg at ogf.org
  http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OGF21 - UR-WG Presentation - with changes-1.ppt
Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint
Size: 461312 bytes
Desc: OGF21 - UR-WG Presentation - with changes-1.ppt
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/ur-wg/attachments/20100323/d601ca51/attachment-0001.ppt 