[UR-WG] OGF28 Schedule

[Jules Wolfrat]

John, Andrea,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
> Behalf Of john.gordon at stfc.ac.uk
> Sent: 23 March 2010 16:42
> To: andrea.cristofori at cnaf.infn.it; ur-wg at ogf.org
> Subject: Re: [UR-WG] OGF28 Schedule
> 
> Andrea, at OGF28 someone suggested that we had a choice of either
> fitting the storage record into the existing UR or defining a new
> standard.  I do not think that this is the case. The existing UR
> UsageRecord element has a UsageRecordType type of which
> JobUsageRecord
> is a defined type. I think we need to define a new type
> StorageUsageRecord which can contain some of the existing Global
> attributes defined for the JobUsageRecord.
So, apparently the choice already was made, with good arguments!

Regards,

Jules
> 
> We could also define a FileUsageRecord to cover the case you were
> defining Andrea.
> 
> John
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:ur-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On
> Behalf
> Of
> > Andrea Cristofori
> > Sent: 23 March 2010 14:49
> > To: ur-wg at ogf.org
> > Subject: Re: [UR-WG] OGF28 Schedule
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > While waiting for the minute I'll suggest we can already start to
> > discuss one basic topic that came up during the meeting before we
> move
> > to more specific things.
> >
> > - Since the beginning I was thinking just to add new properties
> to the
> > existing UR definition. This would allow to choose those that are
> > needed
> > in each situation and reuse those that are common. In case of new
> > versions of the UR definition if we update a property then is not
> > needed
> > to update all the definition if this is common. Not all of us
> agreed
> > with that and it was proposed to create a different usage record
> for
> > the
> > Storage.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > - What would you prefer to do in case we discuss other property
> not
> > directly connected with storage accounting? Should we include
> > everything
> > in the discussion now or concentrate only on this topic and try
> to
> > finalize an update before moving to other things?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Andrea
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 03/18/2010 05:19 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> > > P.S.: here is the link
> > >
> > > http://www.ogf.org/gf/event_schedule/?id=2029
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 03/18/2010 05:15 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear all,
> > >>
> > >> I have uploaded the slide I presented in Munich last Monday.
> As
> soon
> > as
> > >> we check the minute of the discussion I will upload the file,
> we
> can
> > >> continue the discussion and decide how to proceed.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Andrea
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 03/10/2010 04:40 PM, Andrea Cristofori wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Dear all,
> > >>>
> > >>> We have a session scheduled for Monday, March 15 from 4:00 pm
> to
> > 5:30 pm
> > >>> Location: HGB-A 016.
> > >>>
> > >>> Agenda:
> > >>> - UR for Storage Accounting discussion
> > >>> - AUR discussion
> > >>> - AOB
> > >>>
> > >>> If you want to add or change something on the agenda please
> let me
> > know.
> > >>> I'm plannig to prepare some slide to show to the people
> present
> > there
> > >>> that can be a starting point for the discussion.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers
> > >>> Andrea
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Cristofori
> > INFN-CNAF
> > Viale Berti Pichat 6/2
> > 40127 Bologna
> > Italy
> > Tel. : +39-051-6092920
> > Skype: andrea-cnaf
> >
> > --
> >   ur-wg mailing list
> >   ur-wg at ogf.org
> >   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
> --
>   ur-wg mailing list
>   ur-wg at ogf.org
>   http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/ur-wg