[scrm-pvt] Management Roadmap for SCRM discussion

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Hi Dave,

Yes, we already have a public web site and public mailing list.
However we won't announce (or keep blank) until next week.

I will let you know next week, please stay tuned.
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Dave Sidor wrote:
> Hiro,
> 
> Now that the SCRM WG is an official GGF WG, I assume it has its own (and
> new) mailing list, web/ftp site, and possibly GGF-related procedures to
> follow. If so, can you point us to the related information?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Dave
> 
> Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> 
>>Thanks Heather for this pointer.
>>
>>Yes, I think it is very relevant to SCRM activity. It is a high level
>>requirement document for System Management Domain. GGF OGSA-WG also
>>make final call for "OGSA roadmap document v1.0" submission for public
>>comment by GGF at large. This roadmap document is for Grid Computing
>>Domain.
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/9ssa9
>>
>>If SCRM-WG co-chairs, Jay Unger and Mark Carlson, agree, I think it is
>>good idea to introduce these two documents at upcoming SCRM-WG session
>>at GGF14.
>>
>>Is there any other relevant documents we should bring in at this
>>session?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>----
>>Hiro Kishimoto
>>
>>Heather Kreger wrote:
>>
>>>Hello all,
>>>
>>>I know that conversations are underway in earnest on the landscape and
>>>taxonomy papers and I am looking forward to being involved in those
>>>discussions going forward.
>>>
>>>IBM has recently published a white paper with HP and CA that expresses
> 
> our
> 
>>>view on the value of using Web services as a management platform to the
>>>industry, the major, foundational architectural roles, where some
> 
> existing
> 
>>>standards and specifications fit into those roles, and some work on our
>>>radar a little further down the road. We've been informally referring to
>>>this paper as the 'Management Roadmap'.
>>>
>>>We think this paper is of similar scope and direction of the landscape
> 
> and
> 
>>>taxonomy papers. We are very interested in the opinions of those on this
>>>working group.  We'd also being very interested in discussing if our
> 
> views
> 
>>>are similar to your own and if this paper could be used to accellerate
> 
> the
> 
>>>development of this group's deliverables.
>>>
>>>Hiro, I'd be happy to have this paper discussed on a call/meeting
> 
> whenever
> 
>>>the agenda permits.
>>>
>>>Here's the post we made to OGSA, WSDM, and DMTF WS-CIM:
>>>CA, HP and IBM would like to make you  aware of a paper that we have
>>>recently published jointly.  This paper,  'Management Using Web
> 
> Services,
> 
>>>A Proposed Architecture and Roadmap' characterizes challenges facing the
>>>IT systems  management community and defines a roadmap and strategy for
>>>the evolution of  management systems to support emerging business
>>>environments. It explains how a  common approach for manageability
> 
> (using
> 
>>>Web services infrastructure) can  simplify the management solutions for
>>>both existing systems and systems based  upon emerging Service-Oriented
>>>Architectures (SOA). It defines a comprehensive  Web services based
>>>systems management architecture that supports, integrates,  and unifies
>>>several popular management models and technologies in a way to  manage
> 
> any
> 
>>>IT resource in a platform and language-neutral manner.
>>>
>>>We believe that CIM, WSDM, WSRF, and WS-Notification are some of the
>>> foundation standards for this Roadmap.
>>>
>>>You can get a copy of the management roadmap at one of this links:
>>>HP: http://devresource.hp.com/drc/resources/muwsarch/index.jsp
>>>IBM:
>>>
> 
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/specification/ws-m
> roadmap/
> 
>>>CA: http://www3.ca.com/technologies/Collateral.asp?CID=70104&ID=3339
>>>
>>>Thank you,
>>>Heather Kreger
>>>STSM, Web Services and Management Architect for SWG Standards
>>>kreger at us.ibm.com
>>>919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572
>>>
> 
>