[scrm-pvt] Revised WG charter [was: Revised press release dra ft and charter document draft]

[Wijnen, Bert (Bert)]

In the WG charter I see:

  Focus/Purpose
    Several major Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), 
    including DMTF, GGF, IETF, ITU-T, OASIS, SNIA, TMF, W3C 
    have been carrying on a dialogue for about one year to
    try to improve overall  collaboration on next generation
    standards for web service based management of networked
    and individual resources.

WOuld anyone have a problem to change the first few words from
    Several major Standards...
into
    Several people/individuals from major Standards...
I know that some of you speak "for their organization". 
But I do not, I rather speak as an individual who happens to
also be AD for the IETF OPS and Management area.
I believe such is true for some others as well.

I would also prefer reqording of the last para on page 1:
    While this WG will be organized within GGF this does not
    mean GGF will lead the SCRM work. Rather, GGF will just 
    provide the required infrastructure for SCRM-WG. All
    participating SDOs can equally contribute to and promote
    the SCRM work. The SCRM-WG is regular public WG in GGF
    and anyone with relevant technical skills, interest and
    commitment can participate
I would rather see something aka (again acknowledging that some
of us do not officially repersent our organisations):
    While this WG will be organized within GGF this does not
    mean GGF will lead the SCRM work. Rather, GGF will just 
    provide the required infrastructure for SCRM-WG. All
    participating (people from) SDOs can equally contribute
    to and promote the SCRM work. The SCRM-WG is regular
    public WG in GGF and anyone with relevant technical skills,
    interest and commitment can participate

During teh call, I also suggested (and still believe such would 
be a good idea) to change:
    Deliverable 1/Milestone 1: Draft Landscape Document V1.0,
                               October 2005.
    Deliverable 1/Milestone 2: Landscape Document V1.0 ready for
                               public review, January, 2006.
    Deliverable 1/Milestone 3: Final Landscape Document V1.0, 
                               April, 2006.
into something that more explicitly calls out review in each of
the organizations that are listed. So how about:
    Deliverable 1/Milestone 1: Draft Landscape Document V1.0,
                               October 2005.
                           1a: Review in each organization and
                               collect comments, November 2005
    Deliverable 1/Milestone 2: Landscape Document V1.0 ready for
                               public review, January, 2006.
                           2a: In paralelle review in each org
                               and collect comments or OK
    Deliverable 1/Milestone 3: Final Landscape Document V1.0, 
                               April, 2006.
If there are still comments from 2a, then a step 3a might be needed
to have the final review/ok from each organization.

Similar additional steps for 2nd deliverable would be good.

I am actually surprised that we do the "glossary" after the landscape
document. Seems to me we would do betetr to ensure we use agreed
upon terminology in our landscape document, so maybe we should
speed up the process of the glossary document.

I am very concerned with having "Teleconferences every 2 weeks".
I do not find teleconferences very productive. Why cannot the
majority of the work be done on a mailing list? I personally have
far too many fixed-time weekly or bi-weekly conference calls
already. You do state that the primary communication channel is
documents and mailing list. So I do not see why there is such
a pressure on repetitive conf calls.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-scrm-private at ggf.org [mailto:owner-scrm-private at ggf.org]On
> Behalf Of Hiro Kishimoto
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 18:21
> To: scrm-private at ggf.org
> Subject: [scrm-pvt] Revised press release draft and charter document
> draft
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Thank you very much for joining today's call.
> 
> The attached is a revised press release draft and charter document 
> draft, Jay and I write-up based on the discussions we had today.
> 
> We've agreed to do the following two things by this Thursday 
> (June 9).
> 
> (1) Review these documents and send back suggested changes.
> (2) Provide your supporting quote if possible.
> 
> Thanks again,
> ----
> Hiro Kishimoto
> 
> 
>