[Risge-rg] ARI - charter, some questions to be answered to OGF

[Michael Schiffers]

Dear all,
regarding Q1: this is a very valid point. I principally have the same 
opinion. From a technical point of view we do not distinguish too much 
from GLUE. Probably it would be wise to converge both groups -- unless 
there are political obstacles.
regarding Q2: no objections

Best, Michael



Am 17.06.2010 15:00, schrieb Marcin Plociennik:
> Dear All,
> there are 2 questions coming from OGF to be answered before the group
> could be accepted,
> I would like to know your oppinion:
>
> 1.
> "We wonder what the overlap of SIM with CIM and GLUE would
>
> be, and how much ARI's SIM can benefit from those information
> models?  Did you, at any point, consider to perform your work within
> the GLUE group?  In general, we would recomment to cooperate closely
> with GLUE, where approriate.  In particular, you might want to
> discuss with GLUE if and how your models would fit into the 'GLUE
> meta model'.  (FWIW: the same likely holds for CIM, but we recognize
> the fact that interaction with DMTF would put quite some additonal
> burden on the group.)
>
> "
>
> 2.
>
> "If it is ok with you, we would like to have your group in the
> Management area
> (http://www.ogf.org/gf/page.php?page=Standards::ManagementArea)"
>
> I think this is fine.
>
>
> best regards
> marcin
>
>    

-- 
Dr. Michael Schiffers
Munich Network Management Team
Institut für Informatik / Dept. of Informatics
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
http://www.nm.ifi.lmu.de/~schiffer