[Risge-rg] ARI - charter, some questions to be answered to OGF

[Michael Sutter]

  Dear all,

we agree with the previous replies. We should profit from GLUE wherever 
possible and
discussions with the group are most welcome.

The grouping in the Management area sounds fine.

Cheers
Michael

On 06/17/2010 03:00 PM, Marcin Plociennik wrote:
> Dear All,
> there are 2 questions coming from OGF to be answered before the group
> could be accepted,
> I would like to know your oppinion:
>
> 1.
> "We wonder what the overlap of SIM with CIM and GLUE would
>
> be, and how much ARI's SIM can benefit from those information
> models?  Did you, at any point, consider to perform your work within
> the GLUE group?  In general, we would recomment to cooperate closely
> with GLUE, where approriate.  In particular, you might want to
> discuss with GLUE if and how your models would fit into the 'GLUE
> meta model'.  (FWIW: the same likely holds for CIM, but we recognize
> the fact that interaction with DMTF would put quite some additonal
> burden on the group.)
>
> "
>
> 2.
>
> "If it is ok with you, we would like to have your group in the
> Management area
> (http://www.ogf.org/gf/page.php?page=Standards::ManagementArea)"
>
> I think this is fine.
>
>
> best regards
> marcin
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Michael_Sutter.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 320 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/risge-rg/attachments/20100629/dbbbf8d7/attachment.vcf 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3389 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/risge-rg/attachments/20100629/dbbbf8d7/attachment.bin