[Pgi-wg] OGF PGI : Requirements Wiki - Possible values for the Requirement Status

[Etienne URBAH]

Balazs, Morris, Luigi, Johannes and all,

While populating the Requirement tables of the Requirements Wiki at 
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.pgi-wg/wiki/RequirementsTable 
:

For the Requirement Status, I suggest to modify the list of possible 
values, and now use following list :
-  Proposed   (Not validated as 'in scope' and open for detailed 
discussion yet)
- Rejected   (Not understandable, Out of scope, Contains hidden 
prerequisites, ...)
- Dupl.   (Duplicate, therefore Closed)
- Premature (Detailed specification, Specification of implementation, ...)
- Open   (In scope, and under detailed discussion)
- Agreed YES
- Agreed NO

Do not hesitate to make remarks or suggestions.

Best regards.

-----------------------------------------------------
Etienne URBAH         LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS
                       Bat 200   91898 ORSAY    France
Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87      Skype: etienne.urbah
Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27      mailto:urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
-----------------------------------------------------

On Wed, 17/03/2010 22:51, Etienne URBAH wrote:
> Balazs, Morris, Luigi, Johannes and all,
>
>
> Implementing point 1 of the PGI sessions notes taken Tuesday 16 March
> 2010, I have created a 'Requirements Wiki' containing Requirements
> tables at
> http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.pgi-wg/wiki/RequirementsTable
>
>
> This 'Requirements Wiki' is also referenced inside the main page of the
> PGI Wiki.
>
>
> Compared to the sessions notes :
>
> - I have added an 'Areas' column containing the list of areas to which
> the current requirement apply
>
> - For the 'Status' column, I propose to add a 'Dupl.' value, meaning
> 'Duplicate, therefore Closed'.
>
>
> I have chosen the {Area}{Req}.{SubReq} numbering schema, permitting to
> easily :
> - identify the main relevant area,
> - relate requirements and sub-requirements.
>
>
> I have begun populating the Requirement tables, in particular in
> following areas :
> - Non‐functional
> - Information Service
> - Security (Authentication, Authorization, Delegation)
> - Job Management
> and I am continuing.
>
> When proposing your own requirements, please keep the existing Wiki
> syntax, in order to :
> - keep an homogeneous layout,
> - facilitate editing.
>
>
> Do not hesitate to make remarks or suggestions concerning the global
> layout, decomposition per main area, numbering schema, ...
> If any global modification is agreed, I can easily perform it.
>
>
> I am available for further information and help.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Etienne URBAH LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS
> Bat 200 91898 ORSAY France
> Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87 Skype: etienne.urbah
> Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27 mailto:urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Tue, 16/03/2010 18:30, Johannes Watzl wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> See attached the notes from today's PGI sessions.
>> Please send your comments to the list.
>>
>> Best,
>> Johannes
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5073 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20100318/07ea02c3/attachment.bin