[Pgi-wg] PGI Execution Service - Realization via existing specifications
Balazs Konya
balazs.konya at hep.lu.se
Wed May 20 04:00:45 CDT 2009
Dear Etienne,
With your long list of "to-be-profiled" specifications that you collected from
Andrew's proposal you made a very important point:
The "composability" and "profilability" of these specs are not trivial at all.
We saw that an entire OGF WG had to be set up just to synchronize the BES/JSDL
(the HPC-BP group). And that process was slow and painful.
Now we are talking about the extension/re-engineering of BES/JSDL AND the
profiling of the new BES-1.2 JSDL-1.2 specs together with GLUE2 AND trying to
make all these stuff satisfy the complex requirements around data staging.
Plus add the other specs i did not mention here but you put into your list.
The other alternative is to go for a clean spec.
bye,
Balazs Konya
Etienne URBAH wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Concerning the PGI Execution Service :
>
> Thank you very much for your 'GES Realization via Existing
> Specifications.doc' proposal, which targets 'as small a specification as
> possible and attempt to use existing specifications and mechanisms when
> it makes sense.'
>
> In order for your document to be really useful, we all have to carefully
> check if all 'existing specifications and mechanisms' referred by your
> document are :
> - compatible between each other,
> - really implementable,
> - at an affordable cost.
>
> In order to ease this checks, I propose below links for the 'existing
> specifications and mechanisms referred by your document', and I ask you
> to :
> - verify if my links are accurate,
> - provide the accurate links inside the next version of your document.
>
> WS-Addressing :
> http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-ws-addressing-20040810/
>
> WS-Naming : http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.109.pdf
>
> OGSA-WSRF-BSP : http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.138.pdf
> TO BE VERIFIED
>
> JSDL : http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.136.pdf
>
> OGSA-BES : ATTENTION, you are NOT referring to recommendation
> GDF.108, but on 17 April 2009, you sent us DRAFT v32
> 'ogsa-bes-v32.doc', and you are now referring to
> DRAFT v27, which has NO link inside
> http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/listDocuments/projects.ogsa-bes-wg/docman.root.current_drafts
>
> Could we use DRAFT v38, which is Version 3 at
> http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/go/doc15062?nav=1 ?
>
> HPC-BP : http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.114.pdf
>
> HPC-BP FSE : http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.135.pdf
>
> RNS : http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.101.pdf
>
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Best regards.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Etienne URBAH LAL, Univ Paris-Sud, IN2P3/CNRS
> Bat 200 91898 ORSAY France
> Tel: +33 1 64 46 84 87 Skype: etienne.urbah
> Mob: +33 6 22 30 53 27 mailto:urbah at lal.in2p3.fr
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, Andrew Grimshaw wrote:
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> Last week I promised to deliver a document for discussion tomorrow on
>> how to use existing specification (and profiles on those
>> specifications) to realize the requirements in the April 29 draft GES
>> info document. Attached is a word file that sketches out the solution.
>> The document is not intended to be published – it is to organize a
>> discussion and give you insight into my proposed solution to the
>> requirements.
>>
>> I have also carefully read the GES document and have a number of
>> comments on that as well. I will be sending it later today or
>> tomorrow. My comments on the GES are not necessary to understand the
>> “realization” document. I also encourage you to read the ISV primer.
>>
>> Andrew
--
Balázs Kónya
NorduGrid Collaboration
http://www.nordugrid.org
Lund University balazs.konya at hep.lu.se
High Energy Physics phone: +46 46 222 8049
BOX 118, S - 221 00 LUND, Sweden fax: +46 46 222 4015
More information about the Pgi-wg
mailing list