[Pgi-wg] PGI Execution Service - Realization viaexistingspecifications

[Morris Riedel]

Hey PGI team,


  we are running in the pro/contra discussions again and again as it looks
like... consuming our valuable time fosterings positions w/o clear
understanding of the bigger picture.


I suggest we clearly collect all statements related to pro/contra new / old
specs inside the following wiki page tables:


http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.pgi-wg/wiki/GES?_mes
sage=1242216401105


Let's try to collect all statements and positions and have an objective
whole view on all of them together by filling out this page.


I hope this also supports the telcon so thanks for adding your views to the
tables.


Your co-chair,
Morris


------------------------------------------------------------
Morris Riedel
SW - Engineer
Distributed Systems and Grid Computing Division
Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC)
Forschungszentrum Juelich
Wilhelm-Johnen-Str. 1
D - 52425 Juelich
Germany

Email: m.riedel at fz-juelich.de
Info: http://www.fz-juelich.de/jsc/JSCPeople/riedel
Phone: +49 2461 61 - 3651
Fax: +49 2461 61 - 6656

Skype: MorrisRiedel

"We work to better ourselves, and the rest of humanity"

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Jülich
Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Düren Nr. HR B 3498
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig'in Bärbel Brumme-Bothe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender), 
Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender)

>------Original Message-----
>-From: pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:pgi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of
>-Andrew Grimshaw
>-Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 1:48 PM
>-To: 'Steven Newhouse'; 'Etienne Urbah'; 'Andrew GRIMSHAW'
>-Cc: pgi-wg at ogf.org; edges-na3 at mail.edges-grid.eu; lodygens at lal.in2p3.fr
>-Subject: Re: [Pgi-wg] PGI Execution Service - Realization
viaexistingspecifications
>-
>-All,
>-The standard is the standard.
>-
>-That said what I was trying to point out was
>-	1) That with minor updates to the BES spec, say to a 1.1 version we
>-could accommodate many of the requirements in the GES document
>-	2) That in fact the authors of the BES anticipated many of these
>-same issues but that they were weeded out.
>-
>-As another note since it was perhaps not clear. I was NOT suggesting that
>-sub-states become part of a new BES 1.1 specification - that "pending"
>-perhaps should, and that we PROFILE the substates.
>-
>-Talk to you all in 130 minutes.
>-
>-A
>-
>-> -----Original Message-----
>-> From: Steven Newhouse [mailto:Steven.Newhouse at cern.ch]
>-> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:08 AM
>-> To: Etienne Urbah; Andrew GRIMSHAW
>-> Cc: pgi-wg at ogf.org; edges-na3 at mail.edges-grid.eu; lodygens at lal.in2p3.fr
>-> Subject: RE: [Pgi-wg] PGI Execution Service - Realization via
>-> existingspecifications
>->
>->
>-> > -  For BES, official recommendation GDF.108 does NOT contain the
>-> > 'Running:Stage-in' and 'Running:Stage-out' states.
>-> >
>-> >     So we have to decide which basis we take for BES :
>-> >
>-> >     - Either OFFICIAL recommendation GDF.108, which I suppose is the
>-> > one for which you mention existing implementations.
>->
>-> This should be the basis for any further work. Andrew circulated earlier
>-> versions just to show you relevant functions that were discussed that
>-> did not make it into the final version.
>->
>-> Steven
>-
>-
>-_______________________________________________
>-Pgi-wg mailing list
>-Pgi-wg at ogf.org
>-http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/pgi-wg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3550 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20090513/9c1963a9/attachment.bin