[Pgi-wg] Sec: Agreement on WS-Naming (ref by strawman)

[Aleksandr Konstantinov]

On Friday 20 March 2009 16:22, you wrote:
> > So I see a demand that we discuss if our services are contacted with
> > WS-Addressing or not.
> >
> In case this thread turns into a referendum on the merits of WS-Addressing,
> I would like to point out that that the Basic Execution Service (BES) spec
> incorporates EPRs into its interface.

But not for communication. EPRs in BES are for identification of activities. 
That could be any opaque string as well. Or any opaque string wrapped in EPR :)

A.K.


> 
> So, if PGI has apsirations to discuss anything that resembles BES, support
> for WS-Addressing would be a Good Idea if for no other other reason that to
> not have to completely re-invent the BES wheel (again).
> 
> -Duane
>