[Pgi-wg] No PGI TelCon today

[Oxana Smirnova]

Hi,

[snip]
> I am interested that not a single person from UNICORE, gLITE or ARC are able
> to attend? If this is the case then OGF should raise this matter with their
> leadership to find out why etc.

Of course co-chairs are not the only representatives of ARC, gLite and 
UNICORE in PGI-WG. Absence of any of them does not (should not) mean 
absence of the respective m/w representative.

I personally would propose to keep the schedule, and if a chair-person 
is not available, they should appoint a deputy, on a case by case basis, 
to lead the call and take notes of decisions and actions.

As of PGI importance for the 3 middlewares listed above - it's no 
exaggeration to say that the PGI-WG outcome is of vital importance for 
them, and quite obviously this is why they initiated this acivity. I am 
confident they could have converged on a common set of specifications 
even without OGF umbrella. The very fact that this initiative was 
brought into OGF shows its openness.

Cheers,
Oxana

P.S. is it common for OGF leadership to monitor WG activities _that_ 
closely, or is it just a coincidence that PGI has so many high-ranking 
OGF people inside?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: oxana_smirnova.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 293 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20090730/503cf023/attachment.vcf 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2357 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/pgi-wg/attachments/20090730/503cf023/attachment.bin