[ogsa-wg] Re: [ogsa-naming-wg] service/resource identifier on the wire?

[Frank Siebenlist]

Hi Hiro,

Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> ...
> I think the following email thread is what you looking for.

Thanks but no, I know that email well and believe that Tom shows a good 
path forward that addresses the requirements that I articulated.

Probably it is the email thread that Andrew is looking for, though ;-)

It would be good to get some statement of direction whether this is an 
accepted approach for inclusion in the ws-naming spec or how we could 
get to such a decision...

Regards, Frank.


> # To: ogsa-naming-wg at xxxxxxx
> # Subject: [ogsa-naming-wg] WS-Names and WS-Addressing WSDL Binding
> # From: Maguire_Tom at xxxxxxx
> # Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:41:09 -0400
> # Cc: tuecke at xxxxxxxxx
>
>> So this says to me that the <wsa:address> is essentially equivalent 
>> (or at
>> least could be) to an abstract name. 
>
> http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/ogsa-naming-wg/2005/10/msg00000.html 
>
>
> Hope it helps,
> ----
> Hiro Kishimoto
>
> Frank Siebenlist wrote:
>> In the past I've advocated that we need an AbstractName equivalent as 
>> a service/resource identifier on the wire, i.e. present in the soap 
>> message.
>>
>> During the last conference call it was mentioned that at the 
>> ws-naming F2F it was discussed that this was not needed.
>> Could someone explain what the arguments were? What the discussion 
>> was about exactly?
>>
>> (maybe the f2f-minutes would be nice too ... hint, hint ;-) )
>>
>> Thanks, Frank.
>>
>

-- 
Frank Siebenlist               franks at mcs.anl.gov
The Globus Alliance - Argonne National Laboratory