[ogsa-wg] Re: [ogsa-naming-wg] service/resource identifier on the wire?

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Hi Frank,

I think the following email thread is what you looking for.

# To: ogsa-naming-wg at xxxxxxx
# Subject: [ogsa-naming-wg] WS-Names and WS-Addressing WSDL Binding
# From: Maguire_Tom at xxxxxxx
# Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:41:09 -0400
# Cc: tuecke at xxxxxxxxx

> So this says to me that the <wsa:address> is essentially equivalent (or at
> least could be) to an abstract name. 

http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/ogsa-naming-wg/2005/10/msg00000.html

Hope it helps,
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Frank Siebenlist wrote:
> In the past I've advocated that we need an AbstractName equivalent as a 
> service/resource identifier on the wire, i.e. present in the soap message.
> 
> During the last conference call it was mentioned that at the ws-naming 
> F2F it was discussed that this was not needed.
> Could someone explain what the arguments were? What the discussion was 
> about exactly?
> 
> (maybe the f2f-minutes would be nice too ... hint, hint ;-) )
> 
> Thanks, Frank.
>