[ogsa-wg] Proposed (DRAFT) Agenda for Basic EM BOF

[Steven Newhouse]

> One more point: I don't think this should be called the OGSA-BEM BOF or 
> WG.

FYI: The OGSA Resource Usage Service that has been a WG since GGF6. I've 
heard no complaints about this name. We've been quiet recently but are 
meeting at this GGF...

> As we've discussed on several occasions, things may be approved as 
> part of OGSA when completed and widely adopted. We can't pre-approve 
> things, or imply that we are pre-approving things, as the name OGSA-BEM 
> does.

Surely, you mean approved as part of a profile? OGSA-WG controlling that 
makes sense. Does the OGSA-WG control other WGs? I thought that was what 
GFSG (or whatever it may soon be called) does...? But maybe that too has 
changed!

Regards,

Steven
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Steven Newhouse                        Tel:+44 (0)2380 598789
Deputy Director, Open Middleware Infrastructure Institute (OMII)
Suite 6005, Faraday Building (B21), Highfield Campus,
Southampton University, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ,  UK