[ogsa-rss-bof] Charter BoF report

[Andreas Savva]

Donal, Mathias

Consider adding a statement in Focus/Purpose similar to that in the 
BES-WG charter:

> Of particular importance is the interaction with the
> OGSA-WG. The [RSS-WG] will have a review meeting (possibly on the 
 > phone) before document publications.

Then there would be no need to list separately the documents that will 
be reviewed with OGSA-WG.

https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-bes-wg/document/OGSA-BES-WG_Charter

Andreas


Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> Hi Donal,
> 
> Let me make myself clear. In the following sentence, "CGS & ESP 
> recommendation specifications" are intented to mean RSS-WG's
> two main deliverables.
> 
> 1.    D1: Specification of CSG interface and protocol
> 2.    D2: Specification of EPS interface and protocol
> 
> If you think these terms are not interchangable, we should use
> "D1 and D2" instead.
> 
> IMHO, it is very important and should be clearly stated in the charter
> document that RSS-WG and OGSA-WG will collaborate and have a joint
> review to develop specifications which are manure, consisitent, fit well
> in the OGSA EMS architecture.
> 
> Thanks,
> ----
> Hiro Kishimoto
> 
> Donal K. Fellows wrote:
> 
>> Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
>>
>>> Actually this sentence means that OGSA-WG will have joint review only
>>> on service description but don't on CGS/ESP interface and protocol
>>> specifications. I think this is wrong.
>>>
>>> May I propose one more time;
>>>
>>> "we will provide and have a joint review of a service description (as 
>>> an informational document) and of CGS & ESP recommendation 
>>> specifications.
>>
>>
>>
>> I do not think it is necessary to be *that* specific in the charter.
>> It's not a deliverable, after all. :^)
>>
>> Donal.
>>
>>
>>
> 

-- 
Andreas Savva
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd