[ogsa-rss-bof] Charter BoF report

[Hiro Kishimoto]

Andreas,

It works for me.
----
Hiro Kishimoto

Andreas Savva wrote:
> Donal, Mathias
> 
> Consider adding a statement in Focus/Purpose similar to that in the 
> BES-WG charter:
> 
>> Of particular importance is the interaction with the
>> OGSA-WG. The [RSS-WG] will have a review meeting (possibly on the 
> 
>  > phone) before document publications.
> 
> Then there would be no need to list separately the documents that will 
> be reviewed with OGSA-WG.
> 
> https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-bes-wg/document/OGSA-BES-WG_Charter 
> 
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 
> Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
> 
>> Hi Donal,
>>
>> Let me make myself clear. In the following sentence, "CGS & ESP 
>> recommendation specifications" are intented to mean RSS-WG's
>> two main deliverables.
>>
>> 1.    D1: Specification of CSG interface and protocol
>> 2.    D2: Specification of EPS interface and protocol
>>
>> If you think these terms are not interchangable, we should use
>> "D1 and D2" instead.
>>
>> IMHO, it is very important and should be clearly stated in the charter
>> document that RSS-WG and OGSA-WG will collaborate and have a joint
>> review to develop specifications which are manure, consisitent, fit well
>> in the OGSA EMS architecture.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ----
>> Hiro Kishimoto
>>
>> Donal K. Fellows wrote:
>>
>>> Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
>>>
>>>> Actually this sentence means that OGSA-WG will have joint review only
>>>> on service description but don't on CGS/ESP interface and protocol
>>>> specifications. I think this is wrong.
>>>>
>>>> May I propose one more time;
>>>>
>>>> "we will provide and have a joint review of a service description 
>>>> (as an informational document) and of CGS & ESP recommendation 
>>>> specifications.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I do not think it is necessary to be *that* specific in the charter.
>>> It's not a deliverable, after all. :^)
>>>
>>> Donal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>