[ogsa-naming-wg] New Version of WS-Naming
Andreas Savva
andreas.savva at jp.fujitsu.com
Mon Nov 6 00:03:25 CST 2006
I had a really quick look through this version and a couple of comments are:
- WS-Addressing version 2005/03 is referenced. It should be 2005/08
- Since multiple conformance URIs are defined it would be nice (to the
reader) to list all of them in section 2.2, before the statement on
minimal conformance.
> 2) Change all the copyright and IP stuff. I suggest we age Greg to do
> it for us before public comment.
I can do this update if you want.
Andreas
David Snelling wrote:
> [Bicycle crash boiler plate: I will include this boiler plate in my
> mails for a few weeks to apologize for terseness in the rest of the
> mail. I have a broken finger from the crash on Oct 4th, and typing
> is hard and possible only in short spurts. Sorry, Dave.]
>
> Folks,
>
> Sorry for the delay, but due to the above, I can't spend very long at
> the keyboard in any one session.
>
> What I have done:
>
> 1) Taken a copy of the September version of WS Naming and set the
> lock on Gridforge.
>
> 2) Updated dates and version numbers.
>
> 3) Accepted all existing changes.
>
> 4) For tracker 5595 from Andreas:
>
> Item 1: Done.
>
> Item 2: Done.
>
> Item 3: this would make sense if this reverenced profiles were
> external, but since these references are internal to the document, I
> feel this re-structureing is unnecessary. It would certainly be non-
> normative. I have not acted on thi item.
>
> Item 4: This issue has come up before (I thnik in a separate (closed)
> tracker in WS-Naming, but I am off line. In anycase, clinets can be
> expected to discover this through the WSDL of the service supporting
> the resolver or factory portype. Non-normantive text to this effect
> was added.
>
> Due to Item 3, I have left the status as "Pending". The WG will need
> to agree to this negligence on my part.
>
> 5) For tracker 3070 from Frank:
>
> Section 4.2 appears to cater for multiple URIs in the EPR. I find it
> dificult to see why a SOAP message should contain more than one. I
> have not changed this section. This is consistent with the usage of
> the Address field as an identifier, since only one wsa:To field isa
> allowed.
>
> The Metadata section of the EPR already allows multiple instances of
> what ever is needed there, so no schema changes were needed.
>
> The exception was in the fault messages, I enabled the schema with
> the ability to include multiple EPRs of both types.
>
> Closure still to be agreed by the WG.
>
> 6) For tracker 5586:
>
> As agreed below, I did not change the return value from the function.
> I did however, add the possibility of returning and EPI as part of
> the extended error message on a failed resolve. I believe that this
> ie what we agreed.
>
> The new document has been posted. A quick call should confirm it all.
>
> Things left to do:
>
> 1) Schema check - Michel and anyone else who wants to try.
>
> 2) Change all the copyright and IP stuff. I suggest we age Greg to do
> it for us before public comment.
>
--
Andreas Savva
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd
More information about the ogsa-naming-wg
mailing list