[occi-wg] OCCI-Monitoring paper

Fri Sep 21 07:25:32 EDT 2012

Are there any plans for the OCCI group to meet in Chicago?  I think
not, but wanted to make sure as we are running out of session slots.
So *if* you intent to meet, please let me know ASAP.

Best, Andre.

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Jamie Marshall <ijm667 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Augusto,
>
> Jean Pierre Laisné and myself have carefully read your paper and would be
> very pleased to co-author this work with you.
> There certainly are a lot of issues involved. Some of which are fine and
> others really need lengthy discussion and even perhaps demonstration.
> I will be busy for the next few days but sometime next week it would nice if
> we could hook up skype to discuss things together.
>
> Sincerely
> Jamie Marshall
> CTO CompatibleOne
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: augusto at di.unipi.it
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:02:40 +0200
> To: michael.behrens at r2ad.com
> CC: occi-wg at ogf.org
> Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI-Monitoring paper
>
>
> Michael,
>
> The paper starts from the SLA+Monitoring draft: therefore it incorporates
> many ideas more or less explicit in that document. Indeed, it is meant to
> take as much as possible from the draft.
>
> Next OGF is in a couple of weeks: I cannot be in Chicago by that time. And
> in any case it should firstly go through some discussion in the group,
> otherwise it is just "my" paper. But I'd be certainly happy to present it at
> OGF37 or during similar events. However, if anybody goes to OGF36 in
> Chicago, I'd be glad if the paper were referenced or presented.
>
> And co-authoring is also welcome: if anybody wants to help me in the task,
> s/he is welcome. I think that it is also possible to aim at an academic
> publication, for those that are interested to.
>
> Augusto
>
> 2012/9/21 Michael Behrens <michael.behrens at r2ad.com>
>
> I find this (after a quick read) to be very interesting. I like the
> OCCI-Filter resource concept.  I believe some earlier threads discussed the
> need for such behavior (I believe Gary may have mentioned something about
> that before).
>
> Although this is part of the overall SLA work, I agree that make it modular
> helps...and in fact enables this to stand alone to address other use-cases.
> Well done.
> Would this be presented in the future - perhaps at the next OGF?
>
> Augusto Ciuffoletti wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> enclosed you find the 7 pages paper about OCCI-Monitoring.
>
> While working at the OCCI-SLA/Monitoring draft, I realized that the whole
> issue was too much for a single document. The reason to modularize it is the
> same as for modularizing software: in a word, monolithic is bad.
>
> So I tried to describe monitoring in OCCI terms: there is a section that
> explains how this model interacts with the SLA, and with infrastructure
> resources, and the interface between them is sufficiently small to claim
> that the modularization was successful.
>
> My suggestion for managing the collaboration on this paper (whose source is
> in LaTeX, but that I send you as a pdf) is by email and annotations: there
> are many free tools that enable to annotate a pdf. I suggest "xournal" or
> "okular", that are supported by many platforms. You can annotate and send me
> the file that contains the annotations (.xoj for xournal). If you send your
> annotations to the list others --- using the appropriate tool --- can see
> your annotations. There are LaTeX collaboration platforms, but I think they
> are not useful at this stage.
>
> Augusto
>
> 2012/9/18 Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto at di.unipi.it>
>
> Before the end of this week I'll submit to the maillist a paper about
> SLA/monitoring. I considered that the whole SLA+monitoring was too much for
> a single document, and I concentrated on the monitoring part: the connection
> with SLA is explicit, but the paper covers a generic monitoring
> infrastructure, not specific for SLA. So the paper is not syntactically
> derived from the old one, but it is aligned with it and should hopefully
> give a sound basis for discussion.
>
> Further, I tried to adhere to the revision of the "core" document that
> circulated in the maillist.
>
> Bye
>
> Augusto
>
> 2012/9/18 Metsch, ThijsX <thijsx.metsch at intel.com>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> There will be no call today as many of us are double and or tripple booked
> today.
>
>
>
> Next week we’ll pick up the calls again too hopefully finalize the JSON and
> SLA/Monitoring discussions.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -Thijs
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Ireland Limited (Branch)
> Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland
> Registered Number: E902934
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
>
>
>
> --
> Augusto Ciuffoletti
> Dipartimento di Informatica
> Università di Pisa
> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Augusto Ciuffoletti
> Dipartimento di Informatica
> Università di Pisa
> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Augusto Ciuffoletti
> Dipartimento di Informatica
> Università di Pisa
> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>
> _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>

-- 
Nothing is really difficult...