[occi-wg] Fwd: NIST RAAT's comments and recommendations

[Gary Mazz]

Hi,

I just wanted to clarify this document is not a recommended replacement 
for the current Reference Architecture. It is a set of recommendations 
based on a mixture of commercial and RAs from standards bodies that are 
used as talking points. There still needs to be a vetting process to see 
which aspects of the recommendations will be considered to influence the 
current NIST RA.

cheers,
gary

On 3/11/2011 11:06 AM, Alan Sill wrote:
> The NIST Reference Architecture Analysis Team is wrapping up its work 
> as input for the report to be prepared prior to the upcoming NIST 
> Cloud Computing Forum and Workshop III.
>
> The attached represents the current output of the analysis team. Can 
> the OCCI OGF work group members please look this over and offer any 
> insight or comments that may come to mind, please?
>
> We need this ASAP.
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From: *Babak Jahromi <babakj at microsoft.com 
>> <mailto:babakj at microsoft.com>>
>> *Date: *March 11, 2011 12:00:45 PM CST
>> *To: *Hung Nguyen <Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov 
>> <mailto:Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov>>, "micheledrgon at dataprobity.com 
>> <mailto:micheledrgon at dataprobity.com>" <micheledrgon at dataprobity.com 
>> <mailto:micheledrgon at dataprobity.com>>, "garymazzaferro at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:garymazzaferro at gmail.com>" <garymazzaferro at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:garymazzaferro at gmail.com>>, "Stavinoha Ken <kstavino at mail.com 
>> <mailto:kstavino at mail.com>" <Stavinoha Ken <kstavino at mail.com 
>> <mailto:kstavino at mail.com>>, Gregg Brown <greggb at microsoft.com 
>> <mailto:greggb at microsoft.com>>, "John V. Messina" 
>> <john.messina at nist.gov <mailto:john.messina at nist.gov>>, Frederic de 
>> Vaulx <f.devaulx at prometheuscomputing.com 
>> <mailto:f.devaulx at prometheuscomputing.com>>, "Sill, Alan" 
>> <alan.sill at ttu.edu <mailto:alan.sill at ttu.edu>>, Cary Landis 
>> <clandis at virtualglobal.com <mailto:clandis at virtualglobal.com>>
>> *Cc: *"Robert B. Bohn" <robert.bohn at nist.gov 
>> <mailto:robert.bohn at nist.gov>>
>> *Subject: **RE: RAAT's comments and recommendations*
>>
>> Hung,
>>
>> My comments are added to the attached files. Overall, it is a great 
>> job done, everyone!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Babak
>>
>> *From:*Hung Nguyen [mailto:Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov]
>> *Sent:*Friday, March 11, 2011 6:18 AM
>> *To:*micheledrgon at dataprobity.com 
>> <mailto:micheledrgon at dataprobity.com>;garymazzaferro at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:garymazzaferro at gmail.com>; Stavinoha Ken <kstavino at mail.com 
>> <mailto:kstavino at mail.com>; Babak Jahromi; Gregg Brown; John V. 
>> Messina; Frederic de Vaulx; Alan Sill; Cary Landis
>> *Cc:*Robert B. Bohn
>> *Subject:*RE: RAAT's comments and recommendations
>>
>> Good morning RAAT members,
>> I hope you are doing great.  I copied you in my reply to Bob's email 
>> earlier this week.  I just want to remind you that this will be our 
>> last opportunity to enhance our comments and recommendations.  
>> Please feel free to add and make changes to the attached document.
>> I've asked Bob to give our team until 3/14 to finalize the document.
>> Thanks,
>> Hung
>>
>> >>> Hung Nguyen 3/9/2011 2:55 PM >>>
>> Hello Bob,
>> I hope you are doing great.  Thank you very much for your question.  
>> Based on the RAAT's diverse in opinions at Monday's meeting, I 
>> think the team will have to tweak version v0.5 report before we 
>> submit the finalized version as v1.0.
>> Please give us until Monday 3/14/11 to incorporate all the changes 
>> that were discussed this past Monday.
>> *RAAT members:  Please let Gregg and I know of your final comments 
>> before the report is submitted to Bob as the final deliverable.*
>> Thanks,
>> Hung
>>
>> >>> "Bohn, Robert B." <robert.bohn at nist.gov 
>> <mailto:robert.bohn at nist.gov>> 3/9/2011 2:29 PM >>>
>>
>> Hung,
>>
>> Quick question about the naming convention on your report. I see it 
>> ends in “v0.5”. Is this a final version of your deliverable or 
>> version 0.5?
>>
>> Frankly, I would like to call it your team’s final copy since we will 
>> be working on the developing questions based off of the recommendations.
>>
>> -Bob
>> *From:*Hung Nguyen [mailto:Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov]
>> *Sent:*Friday, March 04, 2011 1:15 PM
>> *To:*PStingley at blm.gov 
>> <mailto:PStingley at blm.gov>;micheledrgon at dataprobity.com 
>> <mailto:micheledrgon at dataprobity.com>;marlin.pohlman at emc.com 
>> <mailto:marlin.pohlman at emc.com>; Bob Marcus; Eugene 
>> Luster;garymazzaferro at gmail.com <mailto:garymazzaferro at gmail.com>; 
>> Ken Stavinoha; Randy Baklini;TYoung at icfi.com 
>> <mailto:TYoung at icfi.com>; Anne Fratzen; Dean 
>> Kemp;babakj at microsoft.com <mailto:babakj at microsoft.com>; Gregg Brown; 
>> Hung Nguyen; Frederic de Vaulx; Alan Sill; Cary Landis
>> *Cc:*Bohn, Robert B.
>> *Subject:*RAAT's comments and recommendations
>>
>> Good afternoon Reference Architecture Analysis Team (RAAT) members,
>> Based on your analyses and comments, the attached is a MS Word 
>> document containing our draft comments and recommendations.  Gregg 
>> Brown will lead the discussion on Monday, March 7.  Please let Gregg 
>> and I know if you have additional comments or recommendations after 
>> Monday's meeting.
>> On behalf of Bob Bohn, I would like to thank you for your hard work, 
>> time, and effort.  I would like to also recognize Cary Landis for his 
>> inputs and help in QAing the draft document.
>> Thanks again and have a pleasant weekend.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Hung Nguyen.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> occi-wg mailing list
> occi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20110311/2ba8c946/attachment-0001.html