[occi-wg] Fwd: NIST RAAT's comments and recommendations

Fri Mar 11 12:45:47 CST 2011

I presume a platform's monitoring capabilities are part of "Services
Management"

I imagine it is not intended but one could read the diagram concluding that
only open interfaces are offered to "Cloud Consumers"

Would "Service Developer"  be better placed outside of "Cloud Provider",
given that there are 3rd party service developers? Or is the service
developer in the diagram responsible for the development of the "Cloud
Provider"'s service?

Andy

From: occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:occi-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of
Alan Sill
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 6:07 PM
To: occi-wg at ogf.org
Cc: Alan Sill
Subject: [occi-wg] Fwd: NIST RAAT's comments and recommendations

The NIST Reference Architecture Analysis Team is wrapping up its work as
input for the report to be prepared prior to the upcoming NIST Cloud
Computing Forum and Workshop III.

The attached represents the current output of the analysis team. Can the
OCCI OGF work group members please look this over and offer any insight or
comments that may come to mind, please?

We need this ASAP.

Thanks,

Alan

Begin forwarded message:

From: Babak Jahromi <babakj at microsoft.com>

Date: March 11, 2011 12:00:45 PM CST

To: Hung Nguyen <Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov>, "micheledrgon at dataprobity.com"
<micheledrgon at dataprobity.com>, "garymazzaferro at gmail.com"
<garymazzaferro at gmail.com>, "Stavinoha Ken <kstavino at mail.com" <Stavinoha
Ken <kstavino at mail.com>, Gregg Brown <greggb at microsoft.com>, "John V.
Messina" <john.messina at nist.gov>, Frederic de Vaulx
<f.devaulx at prometheuscomputing.com>, "Sill, Alan" <alan.sill at ttu.edu>, Cary
Landis <clandis at virtualglobal.com>

Cc: "Robert B. Bohn" <robert.bohn at nist.gov>

Subject: RE: RAAT's comments and recommendations

Hung,

My comments are added to the attached files. Overall, it is a great job
done, everyone!

Thanks,

Babak

From: Hung Nguyen [mailto:Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov] 
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 6:18 AM
To: micheledrgon at dataprobity.com; garymazzaferro at gmail.com; Stavinoha Ken
<kstavino at mail.com; Babak Jahromi; Gregg Brown; John V. Messina; Frederic de
Vaulx; Alan Sill; Cary Landis
Cc: Robert B. Bohn
Subject: RE: RAAT's comments and recommendations

Good morning RAAT members,

I hope you are doing great.  I copied you in my reply to Bob's email earlier
this week.  I just want to remind you that this will be our last opportunity
to enhance our comments and recommendations.  Please feel free to add and
make changes to the attached document.

I've asked Bob to give our team until 3/14 to finalize the document.

Thanks,
Hung  

>>> Hung Nguyen 3/9/2011 2:55 PM >>>

Hello Bob,

I hope you are doing great.  Thank you very much for your question.  Based
on the RAAT's diverse in opinions at Monday's meeting, I think the team will
have to tweak version v0.5 report before we submit the finalized version as
v1.0. 

Please give us until Monday 3/14/11 to incorporate all the changes that were
discussed this past Monday.

RAAT members:  Please let Gregg and I know of your final comments before the
report is submitted to Bob as the final deliverable.

Thanks,
Hung

>>> "Bohn, Robert B." <robert.bohn at nist.gov> 3/9/2011 2:29 PM >>>

Hung,

Quick question about the naming convention on your report. I see it ends in
"v0.5". Is this a final version of your deliverable or version 0.5?

Frankly, I would like to call it your team's final copy since we will be
working on the developing questions based off of the recommendations.

-Bob

From: Hung Nguyen [mailto:Hung.Nguyen at nara.gov] 
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 1:15 PM
To: PStingley at blm.gov; micheledrgon at dataprobity.com; marlin.pohlman at emc.com;
Bob Marcus; Eugene Luster; garymazzaferro at gmail.com; Ken Stavinoha; Randy
Baklini; TYoung at icfi.com; Anne Fratzen; Dean Kemp; babakj at microsoft.com;
Gregg Brown; Hung Nguyen; Frederic de Vaulx; Alan Sill; Cary Landis
Cc: Bohn, Robert B.
Subject: RAAT's comments and recommendations

Good afternoon Reference Architecture Analysis Team (RAAT) members,

Based on your analyses and comments, the attached is a MS Word document
containing our draft comments and recommendations.  Gregg Brown will lead
the discussion on Monday, March 7.  Please let Gregg and I know if you have
additional comments or recommendations after Monday's meeting.

On behalf of Bob Bohn, I would like to thank you for your hard work, time,
and effort.  I would like to also recognize Cary Landis for his inputs and
help in QAing the draft document.

Thanks again and have a pleasant weekend.

Sincerely,

Hung Nguyen.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20110311/6b773586/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/attachments/20110311/6b773586/attachment-0001.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Ireland Limited (Branch)
Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland
Registered Number: E902934

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.