[occi-wg] OCCI Document Status

[Gary Mazz]

Hi,

Just as a quick update, Andy and I both have pressing commitments this 
week. We will meet on updating the document next week.

-gary


Thijs Metsch wrote:
> Hi Andre & Group,
>
> We'll use the tracker from the google code project for this. I'll submit
> the comments in there...Basic plan is that Andy and Gary work on most of
> the comments regarding the XHTML5 doc. Whereas Sam and I will probably deal
> with the comments regarding the Core document. But as usual everybody
> willing to help is more then welcome! This process will be started asap :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Thijs
>
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:26:57 +0200, Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> wrote:
>   
>> Dear OCCI group, 
>>
>> please note that all 4 OCCI documents 
>>
>>   - Open Cloud Computing Interface - Core and Models
>>   - Open Cloud Computing Interface - HTTP Header Rendering
>>   - Open Cloud Computing Interface - Infrastructure Models
>>   - Open Cloud Computing Interface - XHTML5 rendering
>>
>> have now officially left the public comment period.  The next step
>> is for the group, and the document authors, to review the comments
>> received, and to thus redact the documents.  You can also decide
>> *not* to follow some suggestion made in the comments, of course, but
>> in that case, please provide a (short) justification, either on this
>> list, with Cc to the comment author if he is not on the list, or in
>> the comment trackers(*).  
>>
>> There is no specific deadline associated with the groups reaction to
>> public comment, but it is obviously in the groups best interest to
>> keep turnaround times short.
>>
>> I want to remind you that major changes to the documents may imply
>> another round of public comments.  The group can either request that
>> to happen, or GFSG can impose that to happen, depending on document
>> changes and level of group consensus.  In any case, please ensure
>> that the finally committed documents represent 'rough consensus'.
>>
>> It would be very helpful for the next GFSG and OGF Editor review if
>> any form of change tracking could be used to highlight the
>> differences between the originally submitted documents, and the
>> final versions to be prepared.  I personally think that a simple
>> diff would be fine, which should be trivial to obtain from your
>> mercury repository, but any other, more elaborate changelog may also
>> be helpful.
>>
>> FWIW, GFSG assigned me as the Area Director to guide you through the
>> document process, so, if you have any procedural questions, please
>> don't hesitate to contact me.
>>
>> Best wishes, Andre.
>>
>>
>>
>> (*) The trackers have now been moved to the archived comments
>>     section at http://www.ogf.org/gf/docs/?archived
>>     
>
>