[occi-wg] OCCI Document Status

[Andre Merzky]

Quoting [Gary Mazz] (Apr 14 2010):
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just as a quick update, Andy and I both have pressing commitments this 
> week. We will meet on updating the document next week.

Hi Gary, 

Thats great to know! :-)

FWIW, I did not want to give the impression that we want to pressure
OCCI to move faster - the pace should be determined by the group,
not GFSG...

Thanks for the update, Andre.


> -gary
> 
> 
> Thijs Metsch wrote:
> >Hi Andre & Group,
> >
> >We'll use the tracker from the google code project for this. I'll submit
> >the comments in there...Basic plan is that Andy and Gary work on most of
> >the comments regarding the XHTML5 doc. Whereas Sam and I will probably deal
> >with the comments regarding the Core document. But as usual everybody
> >willing to help is more then welcome! This process will be started asap :-)
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >-Thijs
> >
> >On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:26:57 +0200, Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> wrote:
> >  
> >>Dear OCCI group, 
> >>
> >>please note that all 4 OCCI documents 
> >>
> >>  - Open Cloud Computing Interface - Core and Models
> >>  - Open Cloud Computing Interface - HTTP Header Rendering
> >>  - Open Cloud Computing Interface - Infrastructure Models
> >>  - Open Cloud Computing Interface - XHTML5 rendering
> >>
> >>have now officially left the public comment period.  The next step
> >>is for the group, and the document authors, to review the comments
> >>received, and to thus redact the documents.  You can also decide
> >>*not* to follow some suggestion made in the comments, of course, but
> >>in that case, please provide a (short) justification, either on this
> >>list, with Cc to the comment author if he is not on the list, or in
> >>the comment trackers(*).  
> >>
> >>There is no specific deadline associated with the groups reaction to
> >>public comment, but it is obviously in the groups best interest to
> >>keep turnaround times short.
> >>
> >>I want to remind you that major changes to the documents may imply
> >>another round of public comments.  The group can either request that
> >>to happen, or GFSG can impose that to happen, depending on document
> >>changes and level of group consensus.  In any case, please ensure
> >>that the finally committed documents represent 'rough consensus'.
> >>
> >>It would be very helpful for the next GFSG and OGF Editor review if
> >>any form of change tracking could be used to highlight the
> >>differences between the originally submitted documents, and the
> >>final versions to be prepared.  I personally think that a simple
> >>diff would be fine, which should be trivial to obtain from your
> >>mercury repository, but any other, more elaborate changelog may also
> >>be helpful.
> >>
> >>FWIW, GFSG assigned me as the Area Director to guide you through the
> >>document process, so, if you have any procedural questions, please
> >>don't hesitate to contact me.
> >>
> >>Best wishes, Andre.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>(*) The trackers have now been moved to the archived comments
> >>    section at http://www.ogf.org/gf/docs/?archived
> >>    
> >
> >  
> 



-- 
Nothing is ever easy.