[occi-wg] Naming format for occi xsd file

Andre Merzky andre at merzky.net
Mon Apr 5 14:56:15 CDT 2010


Quoting [Andre Merzky] (Apr 05 2010):
> > 
> > Andre@ Would the OGF consider extending the naming policy for schemes to 
> > include schema name spaces ?  Also, would the OGFconsider modifying  the 
> > current  naming rules to  make them a little more human friendly, as in 
> > Costas' proposal ? 
> 
> Yes, I would assume we are pretty flexible here.  Both requests
> sounds reasonable to me at least.

Sorry for replying to self - should have read the thread first. 

I'll leave it to Dave to answer schema questions - he knows much
more about that :-)

Cheers, Andre.



> > BTW, I searched for a OGF policy for naming schemes, I couldn't find 
> > one. If anyone knows of one, I'd appreciate a pointer to it.
> 
> Dave Snelling posted a link to
> http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.84.pdf in this thread - probably
> overlapped.  Is that what you are looking for?
> 
> Cheers, Andre.
> 
> 
> > cheers,
> > gary
> > 
> > Sam Johnston wrote:
> > >Also note that thus far we've been using purl.org so as not to deter
> > >external contributors.
> > >
> > >Sam
> > >
> > >On Monday, April 5, 2010, Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> wrote:
> > >  
> > >>Note that there is http://ogf.org/schemas/, which was created for
> > >>exactly those purposes.
> > >>
> > >>Best, Andre.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Quoting [Constantinos (Costas) Kotsokalis] (Apr 05 2010):
> > >>    
> > >>>Hi Gary,
> > >>>
> > >>>How about:
> > >>>
> > >>>http://ogf.org/occi/[version]/[xsd namespace]/[yyyymmdd-c]
> > >>>
> > >>>where 'c' is an incremental revision counter that wraps each day? For
> > >>>instance:
> > >>>
> > >>>http://ogf.org/occi/1.0/XML/20100405-2
> > >>>
> > >>>The first revision of Apr 06, 2010 would then end with 20100406-1.
> > >>>
> > >>>Cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>>Costas
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>On 5 Apr 2010, at 06:54, Gary Mazz wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>      
> > >>>>Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I'm writing the xsd files for occi as well as the rdfs definition. We
> > >>>>will probably also end up with a number of xsd files, one for
> > >>>>occi/xhtml5 another for xml or at the least, different versions of
> > >>>>one.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>To keep the naming convention consistent,  we need to agree on a
> > >>>>combining the occi name, occi version, xsd name space (XML, RDFa, etc)
> > >>>>and xsd version into a coherent naming rule.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Suggestions are welcome :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>cheers,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>gary
> > >>>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>>occi-wg mailing list
> > >>>>occi-wg at ogf.org
> > >>>>http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> > >>>>        
> > >>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>occi-wg mailing list
> > >>>occi-wg at ogf.org
> > >>>http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> > >>>      
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>Nothing is ever easy.
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>occi-wg mailing list
> > >>occi-wg at ogf.org
> > >>http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> > >>
> > >>    
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >occi-wg mailing list
> > >occi-wg at ogf.org
> > >http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- 
Nothing is ever easy.



More information about the occi-wg mailing list