[occi-wg] Naming format for occi xsd file
Andre Merzky
andre at merzky.net
Mon Apr 5 14:50:17 CDT 2010
Quoting [Gary Mazz] (Apr 05 2010):
>
> Hi,
>
> Functionally, I do believe we will have schemes for multiple name
> spaces, a new requirement the current OFG convention does not currently
> address.
>
> Andre@ Would the OGF consider extending the naming policy for schemes to
> include schema name spaces ? Also, would the OGFconsider modifying the
> current naming rules to make them a little more human friendly, as in
> Costas' proposal ?
Yes, I would assume we are pretty flexible here. Both requests
sounds reasonable to me at least.
> BTW, I searched for a OGF policy for naming schemes, I couldn't find
> one. If anyone knows of one, I'd appreciate a pointer to it.
Dave Snelling posted a link to
http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.84.pdf in this thread - probably
overlapped. Is that what you are looking for?
Cheers, Andre.
> cheers,
> gary
>
> Sam Johnston wrote:
> >Also note that thus far we've been using purl.org so as not to deter
> >external contributors.
> >
> >Sam
> >
> >On Monday, April 5, 2010, Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> wrote:
> >
> >>Note that there is http://ogf.org/schemas/, which was created for
> >>exactly those purposes.
> >>
> >>Best, Andre.
> >>
> >>
> >>Quoting [Constantinos (Costas) Kotsokalis] (Apr 05 2010):
> >>
> >>>Hi Gary,
> >>>
> >>>How about:
> >>>
> >>>http://ogf.org/occi/[version]/[xsd namespace]/[yyyymmdd-c]
> >>>
> >>>where 'c' is an incremental revision counter that wraps each day? For
> >>>instance:
> >>>
> >>>http://ogf.org/occi/1.0/XML/20100405-2
> >>>
> >>>The first revision of Apr 06, 2010 would then end with 20100406-1.
> >>>
> >>>Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>Costas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 5 Apr 2010, at 06:54, Gary Mazz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm writing the xsd files for occi as well as the rdfs definition. We
> >>>>will probably also end up with a number of xsd files, one for
> >>>>occi/xhtml5 another for xml or at the least, different versions of
> >>>>one.
> >>>>
> >>>>To keep the naming convention consistent, we need to agree on a
> >>>>combining the occi name, occi version, xsd name space (XML, RDFa, etc)
> >>>>and xsd version into a coherent naming rule.
> >>>>
> >>>>Suggestions are welcome :)
> >>>>
> >>>>cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>>gary
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>occi-wg mailing list
> >>>>occi-wg at ogf.org
> >>>>http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> >>>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>occi-wg mailing list
> >>>occi-wg at ogf.org
> >>>http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> >>>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Nothing is ever easy.
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>occi-wg mailing list
> >>occi-wg at ogf.org
> >>http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> >>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >occi-wg mailing list
> >occi-wg at ogf.org
> >http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
> >
> >
>
--
Nothing is ever easy.
More information about the occi-wg
mailing list