[Nsi-wg] Encoding & Labeltype

[John MacAuley]

The label type that can be switched is placed in the encoding attribute of the switching service.  For example, in 802.1Q the label type is a VID (or vlan identifier), and of course, the terminology was changed in carrier ethernet so we have STAG and CTAG.  Very lucky for us ;-)

If we use the existing vlan URI we would have something like this:

    <nml:SwitchingService id="urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:vidSwitchingService"
        encoding="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/03/ethernet#vlan"
        labelSwapping="true">
        <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/03/base#hasInboundPort">
            <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:nodeA:port_X:1780:in"/>
            <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:nodeA:port_Y:1781:in"/>
        </nml:Relation>
        <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/03/base#hasOutboundPort">
            <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:nodeA:port_X:1780:out"/>
            <nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:example.net:2012:nodeA:port_Y:1781:out"/>
        </nml:Relation>
    </nml:SwitchingService>

This indicates a switching service that can switch a packet on the 802.1Q VID.

John

On 2013-10-31, at 9:37 AM, Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at nordu.net> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> 
>> This is the decision regarding encoding and labeltype that was made for NML:
>> 
>> https://forge.ogf.org/sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6577 :
>> 
>>> NML has currently a one-to-one relation between the layer encoding (a URI to define the layer of sublayer of a specific Port of Link) and the label type (a URI to define the resource label of a technology).
> 
> Make sense. Thanks for clarifying the difference.
> 
> Right now we don't use the encoding in the NSI topology. Is this something we should consider? I am not entirely sure what the benefits are though.
> 
>> There is not a one-to-one correlation, because encodings (such as Ethernet) still allow traffic without labels at all.
> 
> Shouldn't a switching service have an encoding AND a labelType? An ethernet encoding could have both regular and VLAN and carrier ethernet vlan (with q-in-q / s-tag+c-tag), and might only be capable of changing one of them. How would I know which label types can be swapped?
> 
> 
>    Best regards, Henrik
> 
> Henrik Thostrup Jensen <htj at nordu.net>
> Software Developer, NORDUnet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nsi-wg/attachments/20131031/19d94a73/attachment.html>