[Nsi-wg] NSI WG call Wed Sep 7, 2011

Atsuko Takefusa atsuko.takefusa at aist.go.jp
Wed Sep 7 21:34:51 CDT 2011


Hi all,

May I confirm the descriptions of NSA and STP?
It is really important to interoperate with the seven different
implementations.

Which is the correct "stpId" description?
#1 urn:ogf:network:stp:Aruba:A1
#2 urn:ogf:network:STP:Aruba:A1
#3 other?

Which is the correct "requester/providerNSA" description?
#1 urn:ogf:network:nsa:Aruba
#2 urn:ogf:network:NSA:Aruba
#3 urn:ogf:network:nsa:Aruba-OpenNSA
#4 other?

In the John's mail, OpenDRAC returned:
<requesterNSA>urn:ogf:network:nsa:ferb.surfnet.nl</requesterNSA>
<providerNSA>urn:ogf:network:nsa:phineas.surfnet.nl</providerNSA>
<sourceSTP>
<stpId>urn:ogf:network:stp:Aruba:Aiden</stpId>
</sourceSTP>
<destSTP>
<stpId>urn:ogf:network:stp:Aruba:Ashley</stpId>
</destSTP>
It will be modified at demo?

Thanks,

Atsuko


2011/9/8 Jerry Sobieski <jerry at nordu.net>:
> Attendees-
> Jerry Sobieski (NORDUnet)
> Tomohiro Kudoh (AIST)
> Henrik Thostrup Jensen (NORDUnet)
> Jeroen van der Ham (UvA)
> Redek Krzywania (PSNC)
> Michal Balcerkiewicz (PSNC)
> John MacAuley (SURFnet)
>
> Demo presentation at Venue
>
> - We have 5 monitors and desks in the demo space at the art museum.  We have
> a 90 minute formal demonstration presentation window Tuesday from 3:45pm to
> 5:15pm.   The rest of the time we expect to have access to the demo room for
> continued testing.
> ***AI:  Jerry:  Confirm with RNP that the room will be available Wed and Thu
> after the window as well as leading up to the demonstration window.
>
> - The implementation teams are asked to continue interop testing and to
> capture log files as they run the Plugfest Challenge tests.  These log files
> can be annotated to show the protocol messaging.   And these annotated logs
> can be presented at the venue in the demo room in addition to the live runs,
> and/or as part of a short PPT from each implementation team.
>
> - We want to make sure we have as many live runs prepared for the demo
> window as is practical.  But we do not expect all the Challenges to be ready
> or to be presented live.  The anotated logs can be used to complement the
> live runs.   We can allocate monitors as appropriate for the tests
> scenarios.
>
> NSA Implementation Status
> I hope I summarized this close enough...
>
> - OpenNSA (NORDUnet - Henrik)
>     - mostly all functional, self interoperable (Chal #1 works)
>     - encountering many interoperability issues within the MTL (WS* related
> issues)
>     - some testing with dynamicKL, but encountered some SOAP issues not sure
> how to resolve.
>     - Need some input from JM.
> - AutoBAHN
>     - FUnctional, have had some issue in an office move(?)
>     - Expect to begin interop testing very soon
>     - Need updated topology
>     - No WS issues experienced with dynKL
> - G-LAMBDA (AIST)
>     - Almost ready for interop test...
>     - some testing with G-LAMBDA KDDI Labs
>     - authentication is an outstanding issue
> - DRAC
>     - John is coding like a mad man.
>
> *** Decided:  For Rio, we will not require session authentication between
> NSAs.  HTTP only.
>         For SC we *will require* conformant authentication, HTTPS.
> *** For Rio, service authorization will be basic user based authorization.
>         The user will be "jrv at internet2.edu".   Case in-sensitive.   This
> string my be authorized by the NSA however they wish, but all requests as
> part of the Plugfest will use this user credential.
> If the user is present, any/all service requests will be authorized.   If
> not present, or any other user is present, service requests will be denied.
>
> Topology
>
> The current topology is the Rio Ring of 7 networks.  Version 1.1c is
> latest.   However, JM has proposed a modified topology to include "partOf"
> relations for STPs to indicate the NSnetwork object they belong to, and
> "managing" relation for NSA object to indicate which NSnetwork object they
> are responsible for.  This version also uses full URN specification to name
> NSnetowork objects and STP objects.
>
> ***AI: Jerry:  JS will review the topo file asap and if no other issue are
> obvious, it will be circulated as topo version 1.1d.
>
>
>
>
> On 9/7/11 10:38 AM, Tomohiro Kudoh wrote:
>
> This is a resending of test message:
>
> Since the OGF NSI-WG mailing list is down, I made a temporary mailing
> list. Addresses on the Jerry's contact list are registered as well as
> Guy and Jeroen.
>
> Tomohiro
>
>



-- 
Atsuko Takefusa, Ph. D.
Information Technology Research Institute, AIST


More information about the nsi-wg mailing list