[Nsi-wg] NSI WG call Wed Sep 7, 2011

[John MacAuley]

For the STP I prefer lowercase.

> #1 urn:ogf:network:stp:Aruba:A1

This is the correct nsa for Aruba.

> #3 urn:ogf:network:nsa:Aruba-OpenNSA

> In the John's mail, OpenDRAC returned:

Sorry this was my mistake as I returned their real names instead of the pretend ones for the demo.  These were hardcoded in a test program.

John.

On 2011-09-07, at 10:34 PM, Atsuko Takefusa wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> May I confirm the descriptions of NSA and STP?
> It is really important to interoperate with the seven different
> implementations.
> 
> Which is the correct "stpId" description?
> #1 urn:ogf:network:stp:Aruba:A1
> #2 urn:ogf:network:STP:Aruba:A1
> #3 other?
> 
> Which is the correct "requester/providerNSA" description?
> #1 urn:ogf:network:nsa:Aruba
> #2 urn:ogf:network:NSA:Aruba
> #3 urn:ogf:network:nsa:Aruba-OpenNSA
> #4 other?
> 
> In the John's mail, OpenDRAC returned:
> <requesterNSA>urn:ogf:network:nsa:ferb.surfnet.nl</requesterNSA>
> <providerNSA>urn:ogf:network:nsa:phineas.surfnet.nl</providerNSA>
> <sourceSTP>
> <stpId>urn:ogf:network:stp:Aruba:Aiden</stpId>
> </sourceSTP>
> <destSTP>
> <stpId>urn:ogf:network:stp:Aruba:Ashley</stpId>
> </destSTP>
> It will be modified at demo?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Atsuko
> 
> 
> 2011/9/8 Jerry Sobieski <jerry at nordu.net>:
>> Attendees-
>> Jerry Sobieski (NORDUnet)
>> Tomohiro Kudoh (AIST)
>> Henrik Thostrup Jensen (NORDUnet)
>> Jeroen van der Ham (UvA)
>> Redek Krzywania (PSNC)
>> Michal Balcerkiewicz (PSNC)
>> John MacAuley (SURFnet)
>> 
>> Demo presentation at Venue
>> 
>> - We have 5 monitors and desks in the demo space at the art museum.  We have
>> a 90 minute formal demonstration presentation window Tuesday from 3:45pm to
>> 5:15pm.   The rest of the time we expect to have access to the demo room for
>> continued testing.
>> ***AI:  Jerry:  Confirm with RNP that the room will be available Wed and Thu
>> after the window as well as leading up to the demonstration window.
>> 
>> - The implementation teams are asked to continue interop testing and to
>> capture log files as they run the Plugfest Challenge tests.  These log files
>> can be annotated to show the protocol messaging.   And these annotated logs
>> can be presented at the venue in the demo room in addition to the live runs,
>> and/or as part of a short PPT from each implementation team.
>> 
>> - We want to make sure we have as many live runs prepared for the demo
>> window as is practical.  But we do not expect all the Challenges to be ready
>> or to be presented live.  The anotated logs can be used to complement the
>> live runs.   We can allocate monitors as appropriate for the tests
>> scenarios.
>> 
>> NSA Implementation Status
>> I hope I summarized this close enough...
>> 
>> - OpenNSA (NORDUnet - Henrik)
>>     - mostly all functional, self interoperable (Chal #1 works)
>>     - encountering many interoperability issues within the MTL (WS* related
>> issues)
>>     - some testing with dynamicKL, but encountered some SOAP issues not sure
>> how to resolve.
>>     - Need some input from JM.
>> - AutoBAHN
>>     - FUnctional, have had some issue in an office move(?)
>>     - Expect to begin interop testing very soon
>>     - Need updated topology
>>     - No WS issues experienced with dynKL
>> - G-LAMBDA (AIST)
>>     - Almost ready for interop test...
>>     - some testing with G-LAMBDA KDDI Labs
>>     - authentication is an outstanding issue
>> - DRAC
>>     - John is coding like a mad man.
>> 
>> *** Decided:  For Rio, we will not require session authentication between
>> NSAs.  HTTP only.
>>         For SC we *will require* conformant authentication, HTTPS.
>> *** For Rio, service authorization will be basic user based authorization.
>>         The user will be "jrv at internet2.edu".   Case in-sensitive.   This
>> string my be authorized by the NSA however they wish, but all requests as
>> part of the Plugfest will use this user credential.
>> If the user is present, any/all service requests will be authorized.   If
>> not present, or any other user is present, service requests will be denied.
>> 
>> Topology
>> 
>> The current topology is the Rio Ring of 7 networks.  Version 1.1c is
>> latest.   However, JM has proposed a modified topology to include "partOf"
>> relations for STPs to indicate the NSnetwork object they belong to, and
>> "managing" relation for NSA object to indicate which NSnetwork object they
>> are responsible for.  This version also uses full URN specification to name
>> NSnetowork objects and STP objects.
>> 
>> ***AI: Jerry:  JS will review the topo file asap and if no other issue are
>> obvious, it will be circulated as topo version 1.1d.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/7/11 10:38 AM, Tomohiro Kudoh wrote:
>> 
>> This is a resending of test message:
>> 
>> Since the OGF NSI-WG mailing list is down, I made a temporary mailing
>> list. Addresses on the Jerry's contact list are registered as well as
>> Guy and Jeroen.
>> 
>> Tomohiro
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Atsuko Takefusa, Ph. D.
> Information Technology Research Institute, AIST
> _______________________________________________
> nsi-wg mailing list
> nsi-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg