[Nmc-wg] Merge Chaining Examples - LAST CALL

[Roman Lapacz]

Hi Jason,

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Jason Zurawski wrote:

> Hi Roman;
>
> Could you start a thread over there on the issue?
>

Sure. I'll do that (give me some time because today I'm at home with my 
little son and access to my laptop is limited :)

Roman

> Thanks;
>
> -jason
>
> On 4/16/10 3:04 AM, Roman Lapacz wrote:
>> 
>> I propose to continue the discussion on merge chaining (and examples) on
>> NM-WG mailing list (not to leave it for far future). I'll be waiting
>> there for your opinions I asked ealier.
>> 
>> Roman
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>> 
>>> All;
>>> 
>>> On the call today everyone was in agreement that merge chaining examples
>>> do not need to be in the NMC document. They will continue to be
>>> described in NM however. If anyone disagrees, speak up now.
>>> 
>>> Thanks;
>>> 
>>> -jason
>>> 
>>> On 4/14/10 3:07 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>>>> Hi Roman;
>>>> 
>>>> I agree. I will add this to the agenda for tomorrow.
>>>> 
>>>> -jason
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/13/10 7:12 AM, Roman Lapacz wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Jason& all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm reading merge chaining examples in the base doc and I'm not sure
>>>>> that keeping partial metadata elements, which in my opinion are useless
>>>>> after chaining oparation, is a good approach. I don't believe that they
>>>>> might be used for any further processing. Keeping them in the examples
>>>>> presenting merged structures may be confusing for a reader. I would
>>>>> remove them. What do you think (see examples in the attachements)?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Roman
>