[Nmc-wg] Merge Chaining Examples - LAST CALL

[Jason Zurawski]

Hi Roman;

Could you start a thread over there on the issue?

Thanks;

-jason

On 4/16/10 3:04 AM, Roman Lapacz wrote:
>
> I propose to continue the discussion on merge chaining (and examples) on
> NM-WG mailing list (not to leave it for far future). I'll be waiting
> there for your opinions I asked ealier.
>
> Roman
>
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>
>> All;
>>
>> On the call today everyone was in agreement that merge chaining examples
>> do not need to be in the NMC document. They will continue to be
>> described in NM however. If anyone disagrees, speak up now.
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> -jason
>>
>> On 4/14/10 3:07 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>>> Hi Roman;
>>>
>>> I agree. I will add this to the agenda for tomorrow.
>>>
>>> -jason
>>>
>>> On 4/13/10 7:12 AM, Roman Lapacz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jason& all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm reading merge chaining examples in the base doc and I'm not sure
>>>> that keeping partial metadata elements, which in my opinion are useless
>>>> after chaining oparation, is a good approach. I don't believe that they
>>>> might be used for any further processing. Keeping them in the examples
>>>> presenting merged structures may be confusing for a reader. I would
>>>> remove them. What do you think (see examples in the attachements)?
>>>>
>>>> Roman