[Nmc-wg] Merge Chaining Examples - LAST CALL

[Roman Lapacz]

I propose to continue the discussion on merge chaining (and examples) on 
NM-WG mailing list (not to leave it for far future). I'll be waiting there 
for your opinions I asked ealier.

Roman



On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Jason Zurawski wrote:

> All;
>
> On the call today everyone was in agreement that merge chaining examples
> do not need to be in the NMC document.  They will continue to be
> described in NM however.  If anyone disagrees, speak up now.
>
> Thanks;
>
> -jason
>
> On 4/14/10 3:07 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>> Hi Roman;
>>
>> I agree.  I will add this to the agenda for tomorrow.
>>
>> -jason
>>
>> On 4/13/10 7:12 AM, Roman Lapacz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jason&  all,
>>>
>>> I'm reading merge chaining examples in the base doc and I'm not sure
>>> that keeping partial metadata elements, which in my opinion are useless
>>> after chaining oparation, is a good approach. I don't believe that they
>>> might be used for any further processing. Keeping them in the examples
>>> presenting merged structures may be confusing for a reader. I would
>>> remove them. What do you think (see examples in the attachements)?
>>>
>>> Roman
> _______________________________________________
> Nmc-wg mailing list
> Nmc-wg at ogf.org
> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
>