[nm-wg] traceroute transfer/storage specification

[Dan Gunter]

Also, Matt, it might be helpful to look at Martin's overview slides.

http://nmwg.internet2.edu/meetings/ggf14/ggf14-1-swany.ppt

One idea for going forward, then I'll retreat back to my cave. The NM-WG 
version-2 [current] schemata are mostly a framework for separating data 
and metadata. This idea, IMHO, would enhance the IPPM proposal while 
requiring very little change to the proposed schema. This common 
framework would, then, give some minimal level of common ground for 
implementations that want to support both IPPM and NMWG versions of 
traceroute. Since the NMWG schemata already have open-source 
implementations, this would be an advantage for the IPPM effort.

-Dan

Matthew J Zekauskas wrote:

> Some folks are bringing an XML representation of traceroute
> information to the IETF IPPM working group for consideration
> as a working group item.  I'd like to understand how this
> relates to NMWG work; I believe you have some traceroute bits
> in some schema.
>
> Would someone that knows (Or has been following nmwg more closely
> than I have recently) give me a pointer to the nmwg work?
> I'll forward it to the IPPM list.  (Jerome Durand mentioned
> one thing in
> <http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/current/msg00726.html> .)
>
> The proposal in the IETF is
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-niccolini-ippm-storetraceroutes-01.txt> 
>
> if anyone is interested.  I'd be interested in any comments...
>
> --Matt, NM-WG lurker, IPPM co-chair