[jsdl-wg] Re: Copy/Paste bug in JSDL spec

[Andreas Savva]

Hi Michel

> list for HTTP/1.1)? Or do the WG have to do that themselves? What if
> WG have dissolved, and errata are discovered afterwards? 

On the point of a WG dissolving itself let me add (so that Greg can
correct me if I'm wrong) that my understanding is that those listed on
the front page of a document (authors/editors) are committing to
maintaining it regardless of what happens to the WG.

Thanks.
Andreas

Michel Drescher wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> thanks to Ralf, there is another typo known in the spec.
> 
> Though it is not a serious mistake (it is just in an example, after
> all), I wonder if it is feasible to burden the GGF Editor with all these
> small nits and bits to update the specs.
> 
> To the GGF process experts: Does GGF provide something like a maintained
> errata list for published specs, similar to the IETF (e.g. an errata
> list for HTTP/1.1)? Or do the WG have to do that themselves? What if WG
> have dissolved, and errata are discovered afterwards? Is there a general
> need to define a process for that?
> 
> Cheers,
> Michel
> 
> 
> On 24 Mar 2006, at 11:01, Ratering, Ralf wrote:
> 
>> Hi Michel&Donal,
>>
>> I just noticed a minor copy/paste bug in the
>> JSDL specs.
>>
>> In the examples for the Posix extensions -51)
>> there is:
>>
>> page 50:
>> <jsdl-posix:Input filesystemName="HOME">
>> output.txt
>> </jsdl-posix:Input>
>>
>> page 51:
>> <jsdl-posix:Input filesystemName="HOME">
>> error.txt
>> </jsdl-posix:Input>
>>
>> it should obviously be:
>> <jsdl-posix:Output filesystemName="HOME">
>> output.txt
>> </jsdl-posix:Output>
>>
>> and
>>
>> <jsdl-posix:Error filesystemName="HOME">
>> error.txt
>> </jsdl-posix:Error>
>>
>> Besides that, I like it :-)
>> Ralf
>>
>> Ralf Ratering
>> Intel GmbH
>> Software & Solutions Group
>> Hermuelheimer Strasse 8a
>> 50321 Bruehl
>> Germany
>> Tel: +49 2232 209049
>> Fax: +49 2232 209029
>>
>