[INFOD-WG] copies of the spec

[Ronny Fehling]

Should we just note in the details of the different documents what they are and point to the next update? 

We could also change the name of the old ones to include the date of last revision.

 

R

 

________________________________

From: infod-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:infod-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of Vijay Dialani
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:38 AM
To: Fisher, SM (Steve)
Cc: infod-wg at ggf.org; infod-wg-bounces at ogf.org
Subject: Re: [INFOD-WG] copies of the spec

 


Hi, 

Gridforge documentation allows fork, but not merge of the document branches. That makes it difficult to merge the amendments while retaining the history of the document. Hence, only one copy of the document exists in current drafts INFOD Base Specification - revised. The back up copy was created to retain the history. I understand that it is confusing, but to overcome short-comings in the tools capability, we will have to create a backup folder, may be as a separate branch from current drafts. 



Regards,
Vijay Dialani




"Fisher, SM (Steve)" <S.M.Fisher at rl.ac.uk> 
Sent by: infod-wg-bounces at ogf.org 

04/16/2007 12:11 AM 

To

<infod-wg at ggf.org> 

cc

 

Subject

[INFOD-WG] copies of the spec

 

 

 




Hi,

I see that once again we are getting multiple copies of the spec. We
should have exactly one in "current drafts" and nothing in "base spec
updates" nor in "backup". When we are happy with it we will move it to
current documents. It should not have the word revised at the end of it.

Please use GridForge to do the versioning!

Steve 
--
 infod-wg mailing list
 infod-wg at ogf.org
 http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/infod-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/infod-wg/attachments/20070416/ba9fa499/attachment.html