[graap-wg] proposal: stateful async agreement

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Karl Czajkowski wrote:

>On Mar 22, Toshiyuki Nakata loaded a tape reading:
>  
>
>>Hi karl thank you very much for your suggestion.
>>Just to clarify..
>>
>>May I understand that
>>
>>AgreementAcceptance portType is on the Agreement Initiator side and not 
>>on the Agreement Provider side?
>>
>>Best Regards
>>Toshi
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Yes.  It is the return signal path for a symmetric (peer-to-peer)
>variant of the asynchronous exchange. 
>

If I understand correctly, except for the names and the arguments it is 
quite similar to
what Takuya was proposing... (Please refer to the PPT to see if i am 
mistaken or not)

|

> Do you think we need an
>explicit responder-side polling interface too?  I had hoped RP query
>would be enough for the ugly client-server pattern, since we can
>return the (Pending) Agreement EPR immediately.
>

If we are to rely on WS-RP, I think we can rely on the RP query.
I think this matter is still under discussion (No. 15 in my Comment list)

https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1004

Best regards
Toshi

>
>karl
>
>  
>

-- 
We have moved to a new Office!!
Toshiyuki Nakata ?????
Internet System Laboratories NEC 
t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210)
Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Usage of createAgreementAsync(3).ppt
Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint
Size: 25088 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20050322/22964625/attachment.ppt