Fwd: Re: [graap-wg] Comment on section 9, first paragraph,

[Christopher Dabrowski]

OK, thanks for addressing this, Heiko.
Sincerely,
Chris

At 05:23 PM 8/3/2005, you wrote:

>>X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>>To: Christopher Dabrowski <christopher.dabrowski at nist.gov>
>>Cc: graap-wg at gridforum.org, owner-graap-wg at ggf.org
>>Subject: Re: [graap-wg] Comment on section 9, first paragraph,
>>X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.1IBM2 August 03, 2004
>>From: Heiko Ludwig <hludwig at us.ibm.com>
>>Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:08:56 -0400
>>X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Build 
>>V70_M6_06302005 Beta 4|June
>>  30, 2005) at 08/03/2005 15:08:57,
>>         Serialize complete at 08/03/2005 15:08:57
>>X-NIST-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
>>X-MailScanner:
>>X-MailScanner-From: hludwig at us.ibm.com
>>
>>
>>Good point, Chris. I added a clarifying sentence to the draft explaining 
>>that diverging state information is to be dealt with specifially to a 
>>particular domain, e.g., by replication or dispute handling.
>>
>>Heiko
>>
>>-----
>>Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol.
>>IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 10598
>>hludwig at us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160,  mob. +1 646 675 8469
>>http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Christopher Dabrowski <christopher.dabrowski at nist.gov>
>>Sent by: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org
>>
>>08/03/2005 12:14 PM
>>To
>>graap-wg at gridforum.org
>>cc
>>Subject
>>[graap-wg] Comment on section 9, first paragraph,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>All,
>>
>>An additional comment on Section 9, first paragraph #2
>>(WORD version of document dated July 13) states:
>>
>>"2 Call Back. As with the simple client-server scenario, the initiator
>>invokes the AgreementFactory to create a responder-side Agreement. As
>>additional input to the createAgreement call, the initiator passes the 
>>address
>>of an initiator-side Agreement representing the offer he is making. As a
>>result, both parties have an Agreement representing the same accepted
>>agreement relationship between them, to allow symmetric messaging for
>>monitoring and management."
>>
>>Is it clear what is meant by "symmetric messaging for monitoring and
>>management"?  (Also appears in #4)
>>
>>Points of clarification -- does this imply that there are two copies of the
>>agreement, one for  the client and one for the server?  If so, must
>>messages be exchanged to ensure these copies are consistent?
>>
>>I raised this earlier and it may have been addressed.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Chris Dabrowski
>>
>>
>>
>>Christopher Dabrowski
>>National Institute of Standards and Technology
>>100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
>>Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
>>Phone: +1 301 975-3249
>>FAX:      +1 301 948-6213
>>cdabrowski at nist.gov
>
>
>Christopher Dabrowski
>National Institute of Standards and Technology
>100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
>Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
>Phone: +1 301 975-3249
>FAX:      +1 301 948-6213
>cdabrowski at nist.gov

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20050804/babffa82/attachment.html