[graap-wg] Comment on section 9, first paragraph,

[Heiko Ludwig]

Good point, Chris. I added a clarifying sentence to the draft explaining 
that diverging state information is to be dealt with specifially to a 
particular domain, e.g., by replication or dispute handling.

Heiko

-----
Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol.
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 10598
hludwig at us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160,  mob. +1 646 675 8469
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/





Christopher Dabrowski <christopher.dabrowski at nist.gov> 
Sent by: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org
08/03/2005 12:14 PM

To
graap-wg at gridforum.org
cc

Subject
[graap-wg] Comment on section 9, first paragraph,






All,

An additional comment on Section 9, first paragraph #2 
(WORD version of document dated July 13) states:

"2 Call Back. As with the simple client-server scenario, the initiator
invokes the AgreementFactory to create a responder-side Agreement. As
additional input to the createAgreement call, the initiator passes the 
address
of an initiator-side Agreement representing the offer he is making. As a
result, both parties have an Agreement representing the same accepted
agreement relationship between them, to allow symmetric messaging for
monitoring and management."

Is it clear what is meant by "symmetric messaging for monitoring and 
management"?  (Also appears in #4)

Points of clarification -- does this imply that there are two copies of 
the 
agreement, one for  the client and one for the server?  If so, must 
messages be exchanged to ensure these copies are consistent? 

I raised this earlier and it may have been addressed. 

Sincerely,
Chris Dabrowski



Christopher Dabrowski
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
Phone: +1 301 975-3249
FAX:      +1 301 948-6213
cdabrowski at nist.gov 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20050803/5bded10d/attachment.html