[graap-wg] updated draft

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Hello:

Karl Czajkowski wrote:
> Jim has kindly posted version 12 of the draft, including comments and
> revisions by me. The comments emphasize my concerns about the existing
> presentation and content of some sections.
> 
> The revisions attempt to add the extensibility needed for Jon's
> signature problem (without actually defining any signature-related
> syntax) and the "async" interfaces.  I also removed the Terminate
> operation.  

While I do agree that the lifecycle of a generic service agreement could 
last much longer than the service itself,
I am a bit uncomfortable with Agreement as defined in the WS-Agreement 
would last much longer after the service itself has terminated
because of resource problems (like a malloc without explicit free-ing (I 
am afraid I am used to c-style rather than java style programming..)

Would it be possible to specify terminate/expiration of Agreement after
the service has finished and leave the rest of the SLA / accounting etc 
problems to logging services?

Best Regards
Toshi

 >I am sure there are presentation problems and
 > inconsistencies, but hopefully this is a more concrete basis for
 > further discussion of these proposed changes.
 >
> Please ignore the appendix entirely.  The main sections are intended
> to be normative and the appendix is unknown older content that I did
> not touch.
> 
> 
> karl
> 
> https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/graap-wg/document/WS-AgreementSpecificationDraft.doc/en/12
> 
> 

-- 
Toshiyuki Nakata
t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com
+81-44-431-7653
(NEC Internal 8-22-60210)