[glue-wg] New version of GLUE 2.1 draft

[Andre Merzky]

> Perhaps we should drop them a friendly email...

+1


On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Paul Millar <paul.millar at desy.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 08/09/14 16:07, Paul Millar wrote:
>>
>> The alternative is remove SLA complete and do this outside of GLUE.
>> There are languages for handling SLAs; since GLUE provides persistent
>> IDs for all objects, these SLA languages should be usable with the GLUE
>> ID as the subject.
>
>
> I found the "languages for handling SLAs" I mentioned: it was the GRAAP-WG,
> such as WS-Agreement:
>
>         http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.192.pdf
>
> and "WS-Agreement Negotiation":
>
>         http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.193.pdf
>
> Unfortunately, there seems to be a disconnect between GLUE and GRAAP: I did
> a simple search for "GLUE" and found no mention in GFD.192.
>
> I would have expected some linkage here; for example, GLUE describes a set
> of objects and GRAAP describes the SLAs and how to negotiate them.
>
> Perhaps we should drop them a friendly email...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
> _______________________________________________
> glue-wg mailing list
> glue-wg at ogf.org
> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg



-- 
It was a sad and disappointing day when I discovered that my Universal
Remote Control did not, in fact, control the Universe.  (Not even
remotely.)