[glue-wg] glue2 cloud examples

Warren Smith wsmith at tacc.utexas.edu
Mon May 5 09:29:45 EDT 2014


That would probably work for LDAP or SQL (aside from GLUE 2.0 clients not seeing any information about clouds). It may or may not work for XML with our XML Schema. I don't believe it would work for JSON with JSON schema (the validation would fail).


Warren


________________________________________
From: stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk [stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 8:20 AM
To: Warren Smith; salvatore.pinto at egi.eu; glue-wg at ogf.org
Subject: RE: [glue-wg] glue2 cloud examples

Warren Smith [mailto:wsmith at tacc.utexas.edu] said:
> I wouldn't really call the proposed cloud extensions backward
> compatible either: Will a GLUE 2.0 client be able to understand these
> extensions? No.

By backward-compatible I mean that changes don't break existing code, either publishers or clients. If new objects are introduced the answer is yes - publishers don't have to publish them, and clients won't query for them and hence won't be disturbed.

Stephen

--
Scanned by iCritical.


More information about the glue-wg mailing list