[glue-wg] glue2 cloud examples

[stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk]

Warren Smith [mailto:wsmith at tacc.utexas.edu] said:
> I wouldn't really call the proposed cloud extensions backward
> compatible either: Will a GLUE 2.0 client be able to understand these
> extensions? No.

By backward-compatible I mean that changes don't break existing code, either publishers or clients. If new objects are introduced the answer is yes - publishers don't have to publish them, and clients won't query for them and hence won't be disturbed.

Stephen

-- 
Scanned by iCritical.