[glue-wg] Progress on LDAP schema

[Maria Alandes Pradillo]

Hi Florido,

I will try to test this in the upcoming days and get back to you.

Regards,
Maria

> -----Original Message-----
> From: glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org [mailto:glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf
> Of Florido Paganelli
> Sent: 04 June 2014 13:43
> To: glue-wg at ogf.org
> Subject: Re: [glue-wg] Progress on LDAP schema
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> As a follow up from June 3rd's meeting, I corrected the schema with the
> requested changes. All the entities but Entity are of type STRUCTURAL now.
> 
> To ease Paul and Maria's work, I resend the new schema changes and  in
> attachment:
>    GLUE20.schema.20140603
>    distro2.0rc5_diff_2.0rc7.changes
> 
> with a kind request of testing it with their latest software.
> 
> The complete version of the schema in the tarball can also be used Shiraz and JP
> can integrate it into the LDAP realisation document. But mind that I will change
> the version in the final content to put it in the official git-hub (it is now 2.0rc7, I
> plan to change it to 2.0), so we will need an additional iteration.
> 
> The development schema is in my github:
> 
>   http://github.com/floridop/LDAPWIP
> 
> I will send a pull request to the OGF git-hub master repository when we are sure
> this is final, and it will be publicly available on the official OGF repository.
> 
> Cheers,
> Florido
> 
> On 2014-05-08 17:57, Florido Paganelli wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Yesterday I tested the changes mandated by the new version of the LDAP
> > document in a test environment and I didn't see any issue.
> > I didn't see any bad error in slapd logs, and the objects that were
> > affected by changes are published as expected.
> >
> > I attach the latest schema and kindly ask Maria and Paul to test the
> > impact on their products:
> >   GLUE20.schema.20140508
> >
> > A list of diffs between the current distributed version of the schema
> > (2.0rc5) against the new version (2.0rc6) that is included in this email:
> >   distro2.0rc5_diff_2.0rc6.changes
> >
> > I suggest you check them with some nice editor that colors things up
> > so you can easily spot differences.
> >
> > I pushed the source schemas in my git-hub area temporarily, if we're
> > fine with that I will push it to the official repos:
> >
> >    https://github.com/floridop/LDAPWIP
> >
> >
> > I would say that we should put recommendations in the release notes
> > that I added in the README files on git-hub. I didn't do it yet, but
> > the issues I can imagine we should add are the following:
> >
> > 1) ABSTRACT classes to be in sync with XML realisation:
> > Objects like Entity, Resource, Share, Policy have been declared
> > ABSTRACT to be in sync with the XML schema. This means these cannot be
> > instantiated as is; only their specialization can (i.e. Computing-
> > Storage- or others like Benchmark etc.) are objects that can be published.
> >
> > 2) Boolean type changed to DirectoryString This means that if the
> > boolean values that are mandatory in the schema are not defined, the
> > information providers MUST publish them and MUST present the value
> > "undefinedvalue"; GFD.147 Appendix B.17.
> > These are:
> > ExecutionEnvironment.ConnectivityIn
> > ExecutionEnvironment.ConnectivityOut
> >
> >
> > If you spot any problem, let me know.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Florido
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > glue-wg mailing list
> > glue-wg at ogf.org
> > https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
> >
> 
> 
> --
> ==================================================
>  Florido Paganelli
>    ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration
>    System Administrator
>  Lund University
>  Department of Physics
>  Division of Particle Physics
>  BOX118
>  221 00 Lund
>  Office Location: Fysikum, Hus B, Rum B313  Office Tel: 046-2220272
>  Email: florido.paganelli at REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se
>  Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli
> ==================================================