[gin-data] SRM interop plan

[Alex Sim]

I see now what you're saying...   
At least DPM, dCache and DRM are sharing the same type of httpg, I think.
Let's see how it goes when we test. We'll put a column of result for this.
Thanks
--Alex


| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-gin-data at ggf.org [mailto:owner-gin-data at ggf.org] 
| On Behalf Of Aleksandr Konstantinov
| Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:45 PM
| To: asim at lbl.gov
| Cc: Erwin.Laure at cern.ch; gin-data at ggf.org
| Subject: Re: [gin-data] SRM interop plan
| 
| 
|  Which httpg? I know at least 3 implementations of GSI 
| communication channel which are not fully mutually 
| compatible. In ARC I even had to implement 2 httpg's to make 
| it compatible with different clients.
| 
| 
| A.K.
| 
| 
| On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:37:47 -0700
| "Alex Sim" <asim at lbl.gov> wrote:
| 
| > Current SRMs implement "httpg". This is a part of the test 
| when we submit
| > requests.
| > Httpg is not being used for transfer protocols.
| > --Alex
| > 
| > 
| > | -----Original Message-----
| > | From: owner-gin-data at ggf.org [mailto:owner-gin-data at ggf.org] 
| > | On Behalf Of Aleksandr Konstantinov
| > | Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 2:51 PM
| > | To: Erwin Laure
| > | Cc: gin-data at ggf.org
| > | Subject: Re: [gin-data] SRM interop plan
| > | 
| > | Hello,
| > | 
| > | I would like to suggest one more item to be tested before any 
| > | SRM interfaces:
| > | 
| > | Compatibility of transport protocol implementation used by 
| > | SRM servers.
| > | 
| > | I'm talking about infamous "HTTP over GSI" which was never 
| > | properly defined AFAIK.
| > | 
| > | 
| > | A.K.
| > | 
| > | 
| > | 
| > | On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:55:20 +0200
| > | Erwin Laure <Erwin.Laure at cern.ch> wrote:
| > | 
| > | > A more detailed SRM interoperability plan worked out by 
| > | Alex Sim has 
| > | > been added to gridforge.
| > 
| > 
| 
| 
| --