[gin-data] SRM interop plan

[Aleksandr Konstantinov]

 Which httpg? I know at least 3 implementations of GSI communication channel
which are not fully mutually compatible. In ARC I even had to implement 2 
httpg's to make it compatible with different clients.


A.K.


On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:37:47 -0700
"Alex Sim" <asim at lbl.gov> wrote:

> Current SRMs implement "httpg". This is a part of the test when we submit
> requests.
> Httpg is not being used for transfer protocols.
> --Alex
> 
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: owner-gin-data at ggf.org [mailto:owner-gin-data at ggf.org] 
> | On Behalf Of Aleksandr Konstantinov
> | Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 2:51 PM
> | To: Erwin Laure
> | Cc: gin-data at ggf.org
> | Subject: Re: [gin-data] SRM interop plan
> | 
> | Hello,
> | 
> | I would like to suggest one more item to be tested before any 
> | SRM interfaces:
> | 
> | Compatibility of transport protocol implementation used by 
> | SRM servers.
> | 
> | I'm talking about infamous "HTTP over GSI" which was never 
> | properly defined AFAIK.
> | 
> | 
> | A.K.
> | 
> | 
> | 
> | On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:55:20 +0200
> | Erwin Laure <Erwin.Laure at cern.ch> wrote:
> | 
> | > A more detailed SRM interoperability plan worked out by 
> | Alex Sim has 
> | > been added to gridforge.
> 
> 


--