[egr-rg] Changes to Include Impact Discussion in Use Case

[Toshiyuki Nakata]

Hi Robert:
Thank you very much.
Miyakawa-san. could you please try to see if you could fill in some of 
the values? If not , that's OK.
Satoshi: Could you add the item Robert added to the original template.?
PS I lso think we need to add a filed for the USE CASE author name and 
affiliation.

Best regards
Toshi

Robert Cohen wrote:

> Dear Nakata-san,
>
> I have added a few places where I think it would be helpful to include 
> comments on how grids will impact this case. I have provided two ways 
> to discuss these impacts: what are the impacts today (perhaps in the 
> planning stage, the impacts are difficult to document or quantify) and 
> what are the impacts in the future/possible impacts in the future 
> (more speculative, but interesting because it provides an opportunity 
> to indicate what the goals of the grid deployment may be).
>
> I hope this is useful.
>
> Bob Cohen
>
> Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert: Thank you very much for your comments.
>> I would be very happy to amend the template to include the impact.
>> Could you please suggest where to best to put it to?
>>
>> Also, I think sometimes it might be difficult to
>> point out the impact at the planning stage.
>> After it has been used for some time, may be...
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Toshi
>>
>>
>> Robert Cohen wrote:
>>
>>> Dear EGR-RG,
>>>
>>> This is a very interesting use case. It would be more useful if 
>>> there was a section that allowed the person posting it to explore 
>>> some of the benefits of using grids in more detail.
>>>
>>> As it now is written, there are changes mentioned that appear to be 
>>> very helpful to the firm. It also appears that some of the benefits 
>>> may not be attained immediately, but are expected at some point in 
>>> the next year or two.
>>>
>>> If there was a section that allowed a person preparing a case to 
>>> discuss the impacts of using grids in more detail and to explore 
>>> what the firm believes will be the longer term benefits of grids 
>>> that would improve this case study (and others). It would also 
>>> provide a place in the case study where the preparer could do more 
>>> to compare the impact on the firm using traditional computer systems 
>>> and grids.
>>>
>>> Is it possible to consider amending or modifying the structure of 
>>> the case studies so that an impact section can be included?
>>>
>>> Bob Cohen
>>>
>>> Shinya Miyakawa wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> I am Shinya Miyakawa, and a member of "business grid project".
>>>> I'm posting one of usecases of business grid middleware developed 
>>>> our project.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Shinya Miyakawa <s-miyakawa at ce.jp.nec.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Satoshi Itoh" 
>>>> <satoshi.itoh at aist.go.jp>
>>>> To: <egr-rg at ggf.org>
>>>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 8:57 AM
>>>> Subject: [egr-rg] Please submit your usecase
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Dear All in EGR-RG,
>>>>>
>>>>> EGR-RG is gathering usecases of the grid to extract the 
>>>>> requirements for
>>>>> enterprise grid. The usecases are not restricted to enterprise use.
>>>>> Please fill out the attached template according to your grid PJ.
>>>>> It will certainly help us to investigate the enterprise grid.
>>>>>
>>>>> EGR-RG wants to analyse the usecases before GGF14 (June 27-30 @ 
>>>>> Chicago),
>>>>> so please fill out the template and submit it to EGR-RG ML by June 
>>>>> 10.
>>>>> The template word file is attached here.
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Satoshi Itoh <satoshi.itoh at aist.go.jp>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
Toshiyuki Nakata ?????
Internet System Laboratories NEC 
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, 
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan 
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210)
Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)